with love comes understanding. love isn't delimited to a religion and will never be grasped by the worldly and logically wise.
Why not?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
with love comes understanding. love isn't delimited to a religion and will never be grasped by the worldly and logically wise.
Why not?
Are you implying that rationality somehow opposes subjectiveness?love is largely subjective.
no. i'm suggesting that Love is an emotion that doesn't operate from the rational aspect as much as it results from the irrational. like the bias towards a person, for some it's a negative/positive, for another it's possibly the opposite.. being irrational isn't always a problem. like symbolism, and things we find amusing.Are you implying that rationality somehow opposes subjectiveness?
I think that is a very mistaken assumption, personally.
Sorry, there is just no way for me to support such a grave misconception as yours.no. i'm suggesting that Love is an emotion that doesn't operate from the rational aspect as much as it results from the irrational. like the bias towards a person, for some it's a negative/positive, for another it's possibly the opposite.. being irrational isn't always a problem. like symbolism, and things we find amusing.
some things aren't meant to be understood from the objective, but from insight.
NeitherIf a person fails as a religious observant, does the person fail, or did the religion?
If a person fails as a religious observant, does the person fail, or did the religion?
If a person fails as a religious observant, does the person fail, or did the religion?