Evidence of NOAH's FLOOD

[Subduction Zone]

The shells are not on the top of Mount Everest and other mountains; they are inside the rocks that form the mountains. The fossil shells were not deposited on top of pre-existing mountains during a great flood; the mountains were formed by tectonic compression and uplift of fossil-bearing sedimentary rocks that were originally deposited on the floor of the sea.

Yep. The creationist model only predicts a thin layer of fossils. Instead in places we see thousands of feet of them..

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Yep. The creationist model only predicts a thin layer of fossils. Instead in places we see thousands of feet of them..

Actually it predicts layers which altogether are 1000s of feet thick and in total up to several miles,

 

[Monty]

The water is easy to explain. Before the flood, the mountains were much lower. So, then it would not have taken as much water to cover the highest mountains at that time. Not sure if Everest was the highest mountain at that time. After the end f the flood, God raised the mountains and lowered the ocean depths so that the water level returned to today's levels.

Why is there shells at the top of Mount Everest and on top of most mountains?

The shells on the top of Mt Everest are evidence of the collision of the Indo-Australian plate with the Eurasian plate resulting in the formation of Mt Everest about 50 million years ago. And the plate is still moving northwards at the rate of ~70mm/year, which is why the Himalayan range is still rising at the rate 0f ~5mm/year.

So what is your evidence that Mt Everest was not about 8848 metres above sea level when Noah rounded up and herded millions of animals onto his tardis-boat less than 4000 years ago?

And what happened to the dinosaurs and megafauna after they left Noah's tardis boat?

Have you ever had a face to discussion with a god about your hypothesis like Abraham and his god did when they shared a meal together (Gen 18)?

Or is your hypothesis just an imaginary fantasy with not a skerrick of evidence to support it?

 

[YoursTrue]

But what did Noah feed the 14 Tyrannosaurus rexes and the 14 Brachiosaurus and the 14 Seismosaurus and the 14 mammoths and the 14 Andrewsarchus and the millions of other animals on his boat? And was his boat a floating tardis?

A little research into that does not mean that 14 of each came onto the ark.

 

[YoursTrue]

The shells on the top of Mt Everest are evidence of the collision of the Indo-Australian plate with the Eurasian plate resulting in the formation of Mt Everest about 50 million years ago. And the plate is still moving northwards at the rate of ~70mm/year, which is why the Himalayan range is still rising at the rate 0f ~5mm/year.

So what is your evidence that Mt Everest was not about 8848 metres above sea level when Noah rounded up and herded millions of animals onto his tardis-boat less than 4000 years ago?

And what happened to the dinosaurs and megafauna after they left Noah's tardis boat?

Have you ever had a face to discussion with a god about your hypothesis like Abraham and his god did when they shared a meal together (Gen 18)?

Or is your hypothesis just an imaginary fantasy with not a skerrick of evidence to support it?

Well at least there are shells on the top of Mt Everest...

 

[YoursTrue]

The shells are not on the top of Mount Everest and other mountains; they are inside the rocks that form the mountains. The fossil shells were not deposited on top of pre-existing mountains during a great flood; the mountains were formed by tectonic compression and uplift of fossil-bearing sedimentary rocks that were originally deposited on the floor of the sea.

The shells are not on top of Mt Everest? I thought someone here said they were...oh that was Monty.

 

[YoursTrue]

The shells on the top of Mt Everest are evidence of the collision of the Indo-Australian plate with the Eurasian plate resulting in the formation of Mt Everest about 50 million years ago. And the plate is still moving northwards at the rate of ~70mm/year, which is why the Himalayan range is still rising at the rate 0f ~5mm/year.

So what is your evidence that Mt Everest was not about 8848 metres above sea level when Noah rounded up and herded millions of animals onto his tardis-boat less than 4000 years ago?

And what happened to the dinosaurs and megafauna after they left Noah's tardis boat?

Have you ever had a face to discussion with a god about your hypothesis like Abraham and his god did when they shared a meal together (Gen 18)?

Or is your hypothesis just an imaginary fantasy with not a skerrick of evidence to support it?

There are so called enclosed waters in the depths of the earth.

 

[Monty]

A little research into that does not mean that 14 of each came onto the ark.

The bible, however, says that Noah herded 14 of each animal species onto his boat, except for his pigs and he only herded one sow and one boar onto his boat, presumably because of their high reproductive rate.

But what happened to the dinosaurs and the 14 mammoths etc after Noah let them off his boat?

 

[Monty]

There are so called enclosed waters in the depths of the earth.

But what happened to the extra 4.5 billion cubic kilometres of water which covered Mt Everest after the ocean level magically rose at the rate of nine metres per hour for 40 days, given that there is about 1.3 billion cubic kilometres of water on Earth

 

[Monty]

Well at least there are shells on the top of Mt Everest...

That, however, is no evidence for a wordwide flood which covered Mt Everest by 15 cubits less than 4000 years ago.

 

[Monty]

The shells are not on top of Mt Everest? I thought someone here said they were...oh that was Monty.

IOW they're inside the rocks on Mt Everest.

 

[Hockeycowboy]

In at least some cases they fell into crevice's and got covered.

Reference, please.

Because that’s not an explanation that allows for quick preservation, nor does it come close to explaining their numbers found within the Permafrost.

Take care, metis

 

[Subduction Zone]

Actually it predicts layers which altogether are 1000s of feet thick and in total up to several miles,

How does it do that? How does it predict the chalk cliffs?

If you want to make that claim you need a testable model. Tell us what your model is. Tell us what predictions it makes. And give us a reasonable test that could possibly refute it based upon the predictions that your model makes. If you do all of that then you have an explanation. If you cannot do all of that then you are just waving your hands and spouting nonsense.

 

[Monty]

Reference, please.

Because that’s not an explanation that allows for quick preservation, nor does it come close to explaining their numbers found within the Permafrost.

Take care, metis

How many dinosaur remains have been found in the permafrost?

 

[SavedByTheLord]

How does it do that? How does it predict the chalk cliffs?

If you want to make that claim you need a testable model. Tell us what your model is. Tell us what predictions it makes. And give us a reasonable test that could possibly refute it based upon the predictions that your model makes. If you do all of that then you have an explanation. If you cannot do all of that then you are just waving your hands and spouting nonsense.

They are just limestone.

 

[Subduction Zone]

They are just limestone.

Wrong again. You see scientists have these really really cool inventions called "microscopes". Have you ever heard of those?

 

[YoursTrue]

IOW they're inside the rocks on Mt Everest.

Oh...the rocks floated with the shells upward..(?) Or on top of the mountain maybe when it rose? Do you know?

 

[YoursTrue]

Wrong again. You see scientists have these really really cool inventions called "microscopes". Have you ever heard of those?

Microscopes are cool. Lava/magma flows over other things (sediment perhaps) and maybe carried with it more than just what was inside the volcano, you think, as it flowed over the ground into a body of water maybe?

 

[Little Dragon]

Yep. The creationist model only predicts a thin layer of fossils. Instead in places we see thousands of feet of them..

The creationist model could predict purple unicorns that poo rainbows. It's predictive power is akin to my ability to fly unaided.

 

[YoursTrue]

That, however, is no evidence for a wordwide flood which covered Mt Everest by 15 cubits less than 4000 years ago.

didn't say it was. but it's evidence for something. something more than shells being on top in the rocks on Mt. Everest maybe.