dybmh
דניאל יוסף בן מאיר הירש
The text leaves a lot unsaid.We have what the texts say: he lied, others were punished.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The text leaves a lot unsaid.We have what the texts say: he lied, others were punished.
Ah ... the ugly head of a False Dichotomy, a standard Christian Evangelist construct.JUST HORRIBLE!
NO... NO.... NO...
We should teach them about being a drag queen:
View attachment 29902
Some Parents Outraged After Drag Queen Speaks At School Career Day
And ABORTIONS WITHOUT PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT - or sex ed by our friendly neighborhood abortion mill PLANNED PARENTHOOD:
Planned Parenthood-Friendly Sex-Ed Mandate Passes Massachusetts Senate | NewBostonPost
New Jersey
New Mexico
- No parental involvement required.
New York
- No parental involvement required.
- No parental involvement required.
OF COURSE, taught by people who are not psychologist - it is just you and your doctor!????????.
Yes... AND INDOCTRINATE 2ND GRADERS ABOUT HOMOSEXUALITY.
California Brings Gay History Into The Classroom
But Heaven forbid we talk about Pregnancy support choices (secular and religious)
It's the Common Core that is messing me upYou do have a reading problem, don't you.
.
Ah, but then, of course, that is incestuous.She was his half-sister.
Just wanted equal time from the standard atheist construct.Ah ... the ugly head of a False Dichotomy, a standard Christian Evangelist construct.
You are over inflating your importance in the grand scheme of things. Obliterating Christianity and a slew of other religions would be a pleasant side effect for our well being and planet but it hardly qualifies as a "goal." Besides, the "wall" was established by our nation's founders, not by anyone living today. You have a right to believe any claptrap you so desire, but when you lie about it you give up the right to complain when you are outed as a liar.Why ? Because their goal is the obliteration of Christianity, and using the bogus legal argument of a ¨wall΅ between church and state, they think they can accomplish their goal.
Ya know... I would have to research that more fully. But the topic of today's thread is "misrepresenting oneself and duping others so as to illegally push an agenda? "Ah, but then, of course, that is incestuous.
Still, by telling only a half-truth, he was apparently a willing party to the marriage of his (half-incestuous) wife to another man, and it was only God, not Abraham, that did anything to prevent her being touched bigamously.
Truly, I'm feeling morally uplifted.
Equal time is not a right, it must be earned with logical argument rather than False Dichotomies.Just wanted equal time from the standard atheist construct.
Having fun, Ken?JUST HORRIBLE!
NO... NO.... NO...
We should teach them about being a drag queen:
View attachment 29902
Some Parents Outraged After Drag Queen Speaks At School Career Day
And ABORTIONS WITHOUT PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT - or sex ed by our friendly neighborhood abortion mill PLANNED PARENTHOOD:
Planned Parenthood-Friendly Sex-Ed Mandate Passes Massachusetts Senate | NewBostonPost
New Jersey
New Mexico
- No parental involvement required.
New York
- No parental involvement required.
- No parental involvement required.
OF COURSE, taught by people who are not psychologist - it is just you and your doctor!????????.
Yes... AND INDOCTRINATE 2ND GRADERS ABOUT HOMOSEXUALITY.
California Brings Gay History Into The Classroom
But Heaven forbid we talk about Pregnancy support choices (secular and religious)
+1 . Common Core is a disaster in my area ( especially in Physics )It's the Common Core that is messing me up
Equal time is not a right, it must be earned with logical argument rather than False Dichotomies.
ut let me ask a question: why would you teach 2nd graders about family life in a heterosexual context, and not in any other context? Is it because no other context exists? Oh, wait, Elton John and his husband David Furnish have two children, Elijah and Zachary. Should they be made to feel excluded from family life in their own classrooms? (I mention them, because they're famous...there are lots more...)
No, it appears that you did not think. The OP did not give you the right, that is far beyond his poor power to add or detract, he gave you an opportunity, one that you wasted by spewing a Logical Fallacy.I think the OP gave me the right.
I pointed out twice that they were wrong and their misrepresentation was wrong.You are over inflating your importance in the grand scheme of things. Obliterating Christianity and a slew of other religions would be a pleasant side effect for our well being and planet but it hardly qualifies as a "goal." Besides, the "wall" was established by our nation's founders, not by anyone living today. You have a right to believe any claptrap you so desire, but when you lie about it you give up the right to complain when you are outed as a liar.
I pointed out twice that they were wrong and their misrepresentation was wrong.
I suggest you read the establishment clause in the first amendment. It says the government may not establish a religion, that is, determine one as the chosen religion of the nation, and support it.
This was in response to Britain´s established state church.
There is no mention of a wall between church and state, and this legal concept never arose till the 1960ś.
The establishment clause was never meant to defacto say that the state must be hostile to religion, or to totally exclude religion.
It was meant to say just what it says, the state cannot establish an official state religion and support it.
We have never had an official state religion, even when admitted Christians taught in the schools, and Christian student clubs used school facilities for their meetings, or a coach said a prayer before a game,
wiki said:"Separation of church and state" is paraphrased from Thomas Jefferson and used by others in expressing an understanding of the intent and function of the Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which reads: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."
The phrase "separation between church & state" is generally traced to a January 1, 1802, letter by Thomas Jefferson, addressed to the Danbury Baptist Association in Connecticut, and published in a Massachusetts newspaper.
Jefferson wrote, "Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties."
To say nothing of non-Christians.
Q. Is it really Christian to misrepresent oneself and dupe others so as to illegally push an agenda?
.
.
Then you would leave them unprepared to understand a complex world, only because some of the complexities in it make you uncomfortable. Maybe I'm wrong, but I think children are more capable of understanding difficult topics, when delivered properly. You and I grew up mostly ignorant, because there were so many things nobody could talk about (and in my case, without derision and condemnation). That includes, by the way, not only my homosexuality, but also the fact that I was the ******* (sorry, that was edited...not allowed to use the real word for "illegitimate") son of parents long gone. Do you know what I was taught about that (until I went to a Quaker school?) … guilt. Do you know how it made me feel? No, you don't, nor can you ever.I wouldn't... I would teach them, reading, writing with grammar, arithmetic, art, and physical education.
Wrong, no different from teaching creationism in science class.According to Kentucky state law, the Bible can be taught in an elective course at a public school. Hence, a Christian in Kentucky shouldn't have to be deceptive in any way there in order to publicly teach sex education from a biblical perspective . Right?
According to Kentucky state law, the Bible can be taught in an elective course at a public school. Hence, a Christian in Kentucky shouldn't have to be deceptive in any way there in order to publicly teach sex education from a biblical perspective . Right?