So, one disrespects any stranger on the street?
Is that what I said?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So, one disrespects any stranger on the street?
It was I. I made conclusion.Is that what I said?
If the changes are so severe, that the first human is in no way similar to the modern human, then he is not a human.
Yeah but to be fair, that's just wimmin.
Which is why we might have a line drawn to make a distinction, and call the "new" thing something else. Why we make a distinction between chimpanzees and humans, for example. And? What is your point? That changes can become so affective that they preclude the resultant progeny of an ancestor from successfully mating with another result of that same ancestor? If so... then I wholeheartedly agree with you. Yes... such change is possible.If the changes are so severe, that the first human is in no way similar to the modern human, then he is not a human.
I demand more respect! I have proven many things in math and physics!
We don't go lauding the achievements in the realm of math and physics of STRANGERS ON THE STREET now, do we? Give me a break. Your demand for respect only hints that you likely deserve none. Add to that these ridiculous threads you keep starting to put your vast ignorance on display and one gets a very distinct idea that your "accomplishments" in the realm of math and science must be things like obtaining passing grades in primary schooling.So, one disrespects any stranger on the street?
It was I. I made conclusion.
So, one disrespects any stranger on the street?
There are two possibilities:Respect is earned, it is not given freely to anyone who demands it
Love your enemies (Jesus Christ).Nope but equally one does not respect the stranger in the street who may be a thief, a mugger, a rapist, a murderer, a terrorist. Are you honestly saying that you respect such people l
There are two possibilities:
1. In the beginning - respect,
2. In the beginning - disrespect.
I vote for respect.
But what you have prior to respect?Or...
3 wait and see whether the person in question deserves respect
There are two possibilities:
1. In the beginning - respect,
2. In the beginning - disrespect.
There was no literal "first human". It's a gradual transition.
If Bob does not give oxygen to Alice, it is murder. If John does not give respect to Steve, it is disrespect?Second fallacy of the thread: false dilemma.
Love your enemies (Jesus Christ).
Thus, respect any human.
It is the presumption of innocence.
"In the beginning" one may certainly respect the humanity and dignity of another individual in some general sense.There are two possibilities:
1. In the beginning - respect,
2. In the beginning - disrespect.
I vote for respect.
If Bob does not give oxygen to Alice, it is murder. If John does not give respect to Steve, it is disrespect?