Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That because it is paarsurrey's intention to discredit all other scriptures in favour of the Qur'an.Yes, you finally got it. Now ... for the several other threads were about 10 or more Hindus have tried to help you understand, but you have failed will you please review them and try to understand?
That because it is paarsurrey's intention to discredit all other scriptures in favour of the Qur'an.
You can't. Unthinkable. Against Paarsurrey, nah! 'Nasti, nasti, neh na nasti kinchana'!BOOYAH!!! We win!!!![]()
If something has been told to a person, then the person knows. Words can be used in many contexts."Knower" does not mean the one who revealed Veda. Right?
Is it necessary to understand things before copying and pasting?Do you have any idea what any of that copy/paste from Wikipedia means?
Many Hindus take Lord Krishna to be the Supreme God. Who revealed them to rishis? So, for them, the author of Vedas is none other than Lord Krishna, just as @FunnyKindOfMormon says. Hindus do not have the 'Jibreel business'.Some people say the Rishis wrote Veda some say Krishna wrote it. Krishna is not even mentioned in Veda. Is he? Please clarify.
That because it is paarsurrey's intention to discredit all other scriptures in favour of the Qur'an.
One got it wrong.
Did I discredit Veda?
Truth honors Veda and establishes its respect. Please
Regards
One got it wrong.
Did I discredit Veda?
Truth honors Veda and establishes its respect. Please
Regards
Well, you think they're too long when they're not. You think its about wars, not ahimsa, and its not. Just two examples.
Then why discuss it and critique at all? You're a Muslim. If you want to study the Veda for your own interest, that's fine. But if that were true, there would be no point in sharing your criticisms with others.
You're trying to, yeah, by saying that it's been corrupted and the priests have put in loads of stuff and that people should abridge it.
You have no conception of metaphor, or of the possibility of divine truth existing hidden within mundane treatise.
People have said here that there are no poetic expression in the four Veda. It is to be taken literally. Right? Please
Everybody, please
Regards
No, I have not read the 4 Vedas. Hindus ARE NOT attached to their scriptures like Abrahamic are. We don't need to read scripture to know how to perform dharma.Has one read the four Veda (Yajurveda, Rigveda, Samaveda and Atharveda) ? Please
Regards
You are the only person here who is saying that they should be taken literally. Everyone else, about 10 Hindus, are saying much of them is poetic, or beautifully filled with metaphor.People have said here that there are no poetic expression in the four Veda. It is to be taken literally. Right? Please
Everybody, please
Regards
Did Vedas exist before The Bhagavad Gita ?
Friend @Kirran !
The respect of Veda, or any other revealed scripture is to read it often, to get guidance from it in one's life and not to throw its teachings on one's back . Why did G-d reveal Veda, if it was a superficial guidance for the humans and never needed? Please
When Veda believers left Veda, Veda also left them, and it became open for the narrators/scribes/priests to do any corruptions they wanted.
If one leaves one's Jewelry in the open, anybody could pick it up. Right? Please
Regards
Anyway, you're the one going on about corruptions. I don't see that anybody here has agreed with you on that.
Did Vedas exist before The Bhagavad Gita ?
Friend @Kirran !
The respect of Veda, or any other revealed scripture is to read it often, to get guidance from it in one's life and not to throw its teachings on one's back . Why did G-d reveal Veda, if it was a superficial guidance for the humans and never needed? Please
When Veda believers left Veda, Veda also left them, and it became open for the narrators/scribes/priests to do any corruptions they wanted.
If one leaves one's Jewelry in the open, anybody could pick it up. Right? Please
Regards
This is what you often say, but then you go about trying to convince other people that their religion is inferiour. So it is like trying to make yourself tall by claimling other people are all short. So it's contradictory to say one thing, then act differently.
One may like to read post #22 in another sub-forum related to it:
Did I say that? I never said that ever. If yes, then please quote from me.
I always try to elevate the status of all the revealed religions, their scriptures and their founders. Right? Please
Anybody, please
Regards
One may like to read post #22 in another sub-forum related to it:
Did I say that? I never said that ever. If yes, then please quote from me.
I always try to elevate the status of all the revealed religions, their scriptures and their founders. Right? Please
Anybody, please
Regards
Again ... Hinduism is not a revealed religion, its an eternal religion. By default you're therefore not trying to elevate Hinduism. If you were, you would at least listen to what Hindus are telling you.