• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Did Jesus Christ actually die?

dybmh

דניאל יוסף בן מאיר הירש
Jesus was speaking in parables and metaphors. Vampirism is forbidden in both the Old Testament and the New Testament.
If that's true then it weakens the rest of the claims made in the NT. At best Jesus would be a metaphorical messiah, a metaphorical savior, a metaphorical king. Not a literal messiah, a literal savior, a literal king.

Perhaps the entire story is metaphorical then, and the miracles weren't real either.

See how that works?

You said "prophecies they didn't believe were rejected out of pride and religious traditions."

Pride? No. It's based on what is said in the NT. If you claim that it's metaphorical, then that makes a weak basis for claims that Jesus is the literal Jewish messiah.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Matthew 2:1-12
Why would he have been in Bethlehem? The author of Matthew wrote that because he knew the prophesy, not because Jesus was born there. For example one cannot navigate by stars that way. They do not hang over a particular town much less a particular building. Sit up one night and follow what the stars do at night. Nor is there any record of Herod's murder of the innocents. A story filled with holes is not good evidence.
 

Skywalker

Well-Known Member
If that's true then it weakens the rest of the claims made in the NT. At best Jesus would be a metaphorical messiah, a metaphorical savior, a metaphorical king. Not a literal messiah, a literal savior, a literal king.

Perhaps the entire story is metaphorical then, and the miracles weren't real either.

See how that works?

You said "prophecies they didn't believe were rejected out of pride and religious traditions."

Pride? No. It's based on what is said in the NT. If you claim that it's metaphorical, then that makes a weak basis for claims that Jesus is the literal Jewish messiah.

In the context Jesus was talking about either communion or him being the vine. Jesus also called himself the bread of life. He wasn't talking about cannibalism.
 

Skywalker

Well-Known Member
Why would he have been in Bethlehem? The author of Matthew wrote that because he knew the prophesy, not because Jesus was born there. For example one cannot navigate by stars that way. They do not hang over a particular town much less a particular building. Sit up one night and follow what the stars do at night. Nor is there any record of Herod's murder of the innocents. A story filled with holes is not good evidence.

It's not unlikely that Jesus's parents moved from Nazareth to Bethlehem.
 

Skywalker

Well-Known Member
Why would he have been in Bethlehem? The author of Matthew wrote that because he knew the prophesy, not because Jesus was born there. For example one cannot navigate by stars that way. They do not hang over a particular town much less a particular building. Sit up one night and follow what the stars do at night. Nor is there any record of Herod's murder of the innocents. A story filled with holes is not good evidence.

The details about navigating the stars has nothing to do with the Old Testament prophecies matching Jesus or not. The Old Testament has miracles like the talking donkey. The stars were meant to be a miracle and a sign and they don't contradict Old Testament prophecies.
 

Skywalker

Well-Known Member
Why would he have been in Bethlehem? The author of Matthew wrote that because he knew the prophesy, not because Jesus was born there. For example one cannot navigate by stars that way. They do not hang over a particular town much less a particular building. Sit up one night and follow what the stars do at night. Nor is there any record of Herod's murder of the innocents. A story filled with holes is not good evidence.

Saying that he knew the prophecy is cryptic like the Nostradamus prophecies.
 

Skywalker

Well-Known Member
The point is:

Rejecting Jesus is not about pride. It's about what is said in the NT.

The Jews interpreted the prophecies based on their expectations of the Messiah being a political Savior and that was not the mission of Jesus. It was to save us and to teach us how to live.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Saying that he knew the prophecy is cryptic like the Nostradamus prophecies.

Did I say that? Actually the author of Matthew goth the "prophecy" that he relied on wrong in at least two different ways. First off it was not a prophecy. Read it in context. It is talking about an event that was occurring at that time. Second it does not claim that the mother would be a virgin. It only said "young woman". The source that the author of Matthew used was the Septuagint. A work in Greek and the word "almah" was mistranslated.
 

dybmh

דניאל יוסף בן מאיר הירש
The Jews interpreted the prophecies based on their expectations of the Messiah being a political Savior and that was not the mission of Jesus. It was to save us and to teach us how to live.

So, does this mean you no longer think it was pride?
 

Skywalker

Well-Known Member
Did I say that? Actually the author of Matthew goth the "prophecy" that he relied on wrong in at least two different ways. First off it was not a prophecy. Read it in context. It is talking about an event that was occurring at that time. Second it does not claim that the mother would be a virgin. It only said "young woman". The source that the author of Matthew used was the Septuagint. A work in Greek and the word "almah" was mistranslated.

A maiden is a young woman who was assumed to be a virgin in those time periods.
 
Top