I think staff have an unfair advantage in this exercise, because we see each other acting as a kind of jury for our peers all the time.
That's a very good point.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I think staff have an unfair advantage in this exercise, because we see each other acting as a kind of jury for our peers all the time.
Eek! Would I be better off just pleading guilty as charged?![]()
... or your death sentence be hushed.Of course, if you really are guilty you can count on Trump to pardon you these days.
I don't know if I could name 12, let's see.If you were being tried and had to select a jury of your peers from the members of RF, who would you want on your jury and who would you never accept on your jury?
I feel like I’d want @Sunstone because they seem very honest and strive for intellectual honesty.
I thought, and thought, and thought. Probably no one. Bench trial would be nice, I guess depending on the state.
That's like trusting cops to be judge, jury, & executioner.I think staff have an unfair advantage in this exercise, because we see each other acting as a kind of jury for our peers all the time. And in my biased opinion we have a damn good team who does a very fair job and would all make solid jurors.
I exclude @Revoltingest from the list only because I'd much prefer him to be my lawyer.
A law professor I know explained it thus....I thought, and thought, and thought. Probably no one. Bench trial would be nice, I guess depending on the state.
You might regret it.I feel like I’d want @Sunstone because they seem very honest and strive for intellectual honesty.
@Left Coast because I think they value justice. @Rival seems like a good pick to have on your team @SalixIncendium because I think we share somewhat the same sense of ethics. Sort of hehe
@Debater Slayer because I mean it’s all in the name, right? They’d slay in any debate.
@ChristineM Never hurts to have a friendly skull on your side
I’d have @Revoltingest just to spice things up and watch him throw haggis at everyone
I’m sure I’ve missed some, since I am still recovering from Christmasmy poor head lol
Fall down six times, get up seven.Eek! Would I be better off just pleading guilty as charged?
Yes! I broke the 5th precept against intoxicants! I admit it, I did brush the fruitcake I just baked with booze! Will I do it again? Probably.
That's like trusting cops to be judge, jury, & executioner.
![]()
What is it with staff always requesting erotic discipline!
What is it with staff always requesting erotic discipline!
Well, there are times....
If you were being tried and had to select a jury of your peers from the members of RF, who would you want on your jury and who would you never accept on your jury?
The US Constitution's 6th Amendment doesn't even mention peers.It would be impossible. I am without peers!![]()