You are making another claim about me without providing any evidence again.[/quoite]
Did I? Reread that. It appears that you did not understand that part of the post. By the way I see that you are back to using a practice that is rude at the very least and in this case dishonest since you made a false claim about me and justified it by quoting out of context.
I challenge you to provide an example of where I broke up a post in order to be dishonest.
LOL!! You just did.
Of course we could not simply come to different conclusions based on the same evidence.
I either
need to be confused or a liar in order to believe something different than you do.
You don't see how ridiculous that position is?
In this case, yes. That is a fact. But "need" is the wrong word to use and it was improper of you to use it, Perhaps once again dishonest. One cannot be both honest and informed when it comes to creationism. That is a fact. When all of the evidence out there only supports one concept then to pretend that one can interpret it in a different manner is either due to ignorance or dishonesty.
I recall asking you time and time again to present this "evidence" that provse the things you claim, but you never did.
You are almost certainly wrong there. What probably happened is that evidence was given and you were once again either dishonest or ignorant in regards to it. When that happens to often I assume that the person is merely ignorant and offer to go over the concept of evidence. You do not seem to understand what is and what is not evidence. We need to discuss that first so that you will recognize evidence when it is presented to you. This is not "my" definition of evidence. It is a concept that is very helpful to learn. Would you like to discuss the nature of evidence?
There is also no evidence that disproves them.
Sorry, that is a shifting of the burden of proof. Again, not an honest way to debate. There is no evidence that disproves that a word was made by a Fantabulous Flatulent Fuchsia Fairy either. So why not believe that?
And I'll remind you again that you have never once presented any evidence that supports your claims.
And I will remind you again that this is false and that you do not appear to understand the nature of evidence. Repeating false claims is not honest.
Yes, that question was pointless.
No, it was not pointless. Just because a point went flying over your head does not make it pointless Your belief is akin to a belief in a FFFF. By the way, that was also a dodge on your part.
I do not believe that God has lied.
You seem to be confused.[/quote]
See, you are confused. You do believe that God lied, you simply do not realize it. Once again this all relies on the ability to understand the concept of evidence. The evidence is so clear and so plentiful that if your myths are true then your God had to plant all sorts of false evidence. The existence of the evidence, which again only supports one side, tells us that the world as we see it is the result of natural processes. By claiming that the myths of the Bible are true you would need your god to plant false evidence meaning that you are claiming that your god lied by doing so. An ignorance of what is and what is not evidence is all that protects you.
The evidence that you are incapable of ever sharing?
Once again it is rather apparent that you do not understand the concept of evidence. If you refuse to learn what and what is not evidence you will only complain about a lack of evidence. Learn the basics first and then you can demand evidence. Until then it is hypocritical to demand it.
God has not kept anything hidden from you.
Everything you need to know in order to become a witness of spiritual things is contained in the scriptures.
It has been your own ineptitude that caused these things to remain hidden to you.
Now that is a false claim. You really need to watch yourself. Christians like you tend to have an "inept" approach to the Bible. Don't blame others for your sins. Your version of god has kept himself hidden from me and countless others like me. We could discuss that too if you like. Do you think that you can learn how to focus on one subject at a time and respond properly?
In the post that I responded to.
I do not hate anyone.
Who are you claiming that I hate?
I am confident.
It is rather clear that you hate homosexuals. You try to justify your hatred with your book of myths, but like it or not that still is hatred on your part. And you may be "confident" but that is merely because you have fooled yourself. A person without hate could see the flaws in the Bible. A book cannot be both a book of hate and a book of love at the same time. If you read it and understood it you would see that it shows the advancement of the Hebrews from an aggressive and immoral belligerent tribal people to the beginnings of a civilized people. Instead you apply an overly simplistic interpretation of it and will probably even deny that it says what it clearly says at times since it goes against your own beliefs. The religious often make that mistake when it comes to their holy books. They think it says what they want it to say rather than what it actually says.