Opinions - supporting my position that we can look at the same thing and come to different conclusions"There once was a young man named Fisk
Whose fencing was exceedingly brisk
So fast was is action, that Fitzgerald contraction, reduced his rapier to a disk."
Misleading. Often one side is poorly or completely unsupported. The truth is rarely found at the mid-point between the extremes
The non-occurrence of a worldwide flood is pretty cut and dry. There is no evidence whatsoever for such a flood, and such an event would have left massive evidence.
There would be mounds of evidence, and many familiar scientific disciplines would be turned on their heads.
Last edited: