Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Mind reader, you.Give me an example of the distinction between reason and logic as you understand those concepts, @paarsurrey
Reason is common sense and wisdom endowed to humans by G-d naturally to decipher meaning in the things with one's experiences with the available sources of knowledge.Give me an example of the distinction between reason and logic as you understand those concepts, @paarsurrey
Generally the individual decides on the truth of an experience for themselves. Neither reason nor logic are infallible. Using either can result in completely wrong answers.
Science actually requires verification. Actual proof of reason or logic. Science is also fallible but you are more likely to get closer to the actuality of a thing.
If one is so sure about one's experience, that though one cannot show it to others for verifying the same but one has not doubt in it whatsoever.I don't know what you mean be by truthful experiences. An experience is an experience and is subject to personal interpretation.
If one is so sure about one's experience, that though one cannot show it to others for verifying the same but one has not doubt in it whatsoever.
Regards
Please repair it as one understands.Not sure I understand your post......the sentence is rather tortured.
I don't doubt that people have 'experiences" of various sorts. The question is how do you verify their interpretation of what the experience was, or was caused by? Without being able to do that, the statement "I had an experience in which god talked to me" has no more credibility than the statement "I had an experience in which I saw a pink unicorn"
Can we say that the reason is used and must be used in the phenomena where experiments are not possible and one has to rely simply on the experiences?
Regards
Logic* is a recent tool of philosophy, it was not there with the humans for thousands of years. Right, please?Anyone can give a reason but a reason has to have logic or it is not a valid reason.
Logic* is a recent tool of philosophy, it was not there with the humans for thousands of years. Right, please?
Regards
___________
* "The history of logic deals with the study of the development of the science of valid inference (logic). Formal logics developed in ancient times in India, China, and Greece. Greek methods, particularly Aristotelian logic (or term logic) as found in the Organon, found wide application and acceptance in Western science and mathematics for millennia.[1] The Stoics, especially Chrysippus, began the development of predicate logic.
Christian and Islamic philosophers such as Boethius (died 524) and William of Ockham (died 1347) further developed Aristotle's logic in the Middle Ages, reaching a high point in the mid-fourteenth century, with Jean Buridan. The period between the fourteenth century and the beginning of the nineteenth century saw largely decline and neglect, and at least one historian of logic regards this time as barren.[2]Empirical methods ruled the day, as evidenced by Sir Francis Bacon's Novum Organon of 1620."
History of logic - Wikipedia
Then I have no idea of how to recognize reason as distinct from logic.Reason is common sense and wisdom endowed to humans by G-d naturally to decipher meaning in the things with one's experiences with the available sources of knowledge.
Logic is to get meanings as per the standards/systems fixed by the humans, and it is not as old as the reason is with the humans since inception.
I may be wrong. Right, please?
Regards
eh what? reasoning skills are logic to me. god in my opinion skews the ability for reasoning. Makes people jump weave their way to avoid reason. with information that has no ground based on reality.Reason is common sense and wisdom endowed to humans by G-d naturally to decipher meaning in the things with one's experiences with the available sources of knowledge.
Logic is to get meanings as per the standards/systems fixed by the humans, and it is not as old as the reason is with the humans since inception.
I may be wrong. Right, please?
Regards
Reason is the basic characteristic of humans endowed to them by G-d, logic is one of the tools with which we solve problems in certain fields.Then I have no idea of how to recognize reason as distinct from logic.
Reason is the basic characteristic of humans endowed to them by G-d, logic is one of the tools with which we solve problems in certain fields.
Reason of itself is blind and cannot lead humans anywhere without a conjugal partner, and there are many of them. Right, please?
I could be wrong, then please correct me.
Regards
"I could be wrong, then please correct me."Prove it. Don't worry I'll wait