Karma means "consequence". Why do you call it an order?karma is an order
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Karma means "consequence". Why do you call it an order?karma is an order
Tibetan Buddhism is somewhat theistic but all of these are impermanent. Chan Buddhism more philosophicalFrom what it is you currently know and understand about Buddhism; Is it a theistic or non-theistic practice?
Does Buddhism have deities and other spirits, or is it purely a philisophical position?
From what it is you currently know and understand about Buddhism; Is it a theistic or non-theistic practice?
Does Buddhism have deities and other spirits, or is it purely a philisophical position?
Karma means "consequence". Why do you call it an order?
From what it is you currently know and understand about Buddhism; Is it a theistic or non-theistic practice?
Does Buddhism have deities and other spirits, or is it purely a philisophical position?
Yet another aspect of anatta/emptiness.<...>
"Buddhism includes a wide array of divine beings that are venerated in various ritual and popular contexts. Initially they included mainly Indian figures such as devas, asuras and yakshas, but later came to include other Asian spirits and local gods (like the Burmese nats). They range from enlightened Buddhas to regional spirits adopted by Buddhists or practiced on the margins of the religion. Notably, Buddhism lacks a supreme creator deity."
<...>
Yet another aspect of anatta/emptiness.
Voted no. Buddhism is not theistic in itself but a way of life
I have met Buddhists who don't believe in gods and Buddhists who do have personal gods. Whichever way their life path takes them
Swine.Yeah, I could have, and should have put a "both" option. But I really was interested in what appears to be the secularization of Buddhism in the West. Like using "Mindfulness" in a mental health setting, something the Buddha spoke at length on.
So I left it a dichotomy to see which way people thought to lean.
Swine.
Fair enough. Anyway I saw your game and didn't vote!Cultured Swine
That's not what I meant. Think about it in a pantheistic context.I don't think the lack of a Supreme Creator in Buddhism is an example that denotes Anatta.
The universe doesn't need a Creator for it to be Non-empty.
Swine.
Didn't Buddha die from eating "pig delights?"Cultured Swine
From what it is you currently know and understand about Buddhism; Is it a theistic or non-theistic practice?
Does Buddhism have deities and other spirits, or is it purely a philisophical position?
Whatever harm an enemy may do to an enemy, or a hater to a hater, an ill-directed mind inflicts on oneself a greater harm. (Verse 42)
Neither mother, father, nor any other relative can do one greater good than one’s own well-directed mind. (Verse 43)
A disciplined mind brings happiness. (Verse 35)
The non-doing of any evil,the performance of what’s skillful,the cleansing of one’s own mind:This is the Buddhas’ teaching. (Verse 183)
Be a lamp unto yourself, be a refuge to yourself. ~ Mahaparinibbana Sutta
... For a faithful disciple who is intent on fathoming the Teacher's Dispensation, it is natural that he conduct himself thus: 'Willingly, let only my skin, sinews, and bones remain, and let the flesh and blood dry up on my body, but my energy shall not be relaxed so long as I have not attained what can be attained by virile strength [purisa-tthāmena], virile energy [purisa-viriyena], and virile persistence [purisa-parakkamena]....". ~ Kīṭāgiri Sutta (MN 70)
We are both safe from the "pig's delights" then.Fair enough. Anyway I saw your game and didn't vote!
I did read of that possibility.Didn't Buddha die from eating "pig delights?"
I'm sure many do. *grin*I disagree and so does a large segment of Buddhist practitioners in east Asia.