What the hell????
You must have a passion for this word
Not this one particularly, but as a former state spelling champion and a published author, I do have a passion for words and language in general, so it does bother me to see them used incorrectly, and I am enough of a philanthropist to want to share my knowledge with those like yourself so obviously in need of it.
Apparently not TOO scared, since I see you produced another manifest of errors for me to address today.
Youd probably go through another rant instead conversing like a normal person word.
Sorry to disappoint you on the ranting--that's not my style--but I will take the time to walk you out of the minefield of errors that you have made your home in this thread.
RF isnt an excuse to be rude.
Well, if you see anyone being rude, be sure to report them to the site moderators. They should be able to resolve the issue.
And when you wonder, I will be there to help you turn your curiosity into knowledge.
TONE IT DOWN AND THEN TALK
Not a chance. So long as you persist in your error(s), I will persist in correcting you.
Nope. Miracle, like god and blessings, are defined by culture and origin of language. Toemayto, tomatoe
ERROR!
Nope, those words, and many others, are defined by a dictionary of the words used in OUR culture and language. Their meaning is not up for debate, nor are they a matter of personal preference.
Don't need to yell. I get it.
If you get it, then what's all this, then?
Thank you for the insult.
ERROR!
Referencing your demonstrated disregard for, if not ignorance of, the definition of the word "miracle" is not an insult, it is an objective description of the circumstances of our conversation. For comparison, consider the following:
“Thou clay-brained guts, thou knotty-pated fool, thou whoreson obscene greasy tallow-catch!”
Now THAT'S an insult--crafted by one of the masters, William Shakespeare (Henry IV Part 1, Act 2, Scene 4). Compare and contrast to discover the difference between my descriptions of your errors and actual insults.
You're welcome.
Seems to be a problem for you. Got to understand language and culture before you attack my facts.
Got to have facts before I can attack them. So far all I can do is correct your errors.
Then why are you attacking me and what I say?
You got to go deeper.
ERROR!
I am not attacking you. I am correcting what you say because it is in error.
We can go deeper if you like, but first I have to help you understand the meaning of the word miracle. Until you get that under your belt, I'm afraid any attempt at a deeper understanding would be doomed to failure.
So you know everything about life?
Nope. Fortunately, that is irrelevant to our discussion.
I know what I experience doesn't have natural causes. I also believe anything I do is a miracle because life has no natural cause. It has no cause.
ERROR!
Tell me something you have experienced that you know, for sure, does not have a natural cause. Life--nature--by definition--is natural--so anything that has to do with "living" or "waking up in the morning" is automatically disqualified.
ERROR!
If you say that you do not know the natural laws that govern your life, then it is not an insult to say that you are ignorant of them--it is a description of your not-knowing. For comparison, consider the following:
“Thou leathern-jerkin, crystal-button, knot-pated, agatering, puke-stocking, caddis-garter, smooth-tongue, Spanish pouch!”
Now THAT'S an insult--again, crafted by one of the masters, William Shakespeare (Henry IV Part 1, Act 2, Scene 4). Compare and contrast to discover the difference between my recognition of your ignorance and actual insults.
We disagree doesn't mean you are ignorant nor does it mean I am. Cut it.
ERROR!
It is not our disagreement that make you ignorant. It is your stated ignorance of the natural laws that govern your life that makes you ignorant. I can't "cut it" unless you allow yourself to be informed; that is the only cure for ignorance.
I do.
ERROR!
Repeating your own defense of using the word "miracle" to describe events that can be explained by natural laws (that YOU DON"T KNOW what the explanation is, and therefore it's a miracle) is not an insult, it is reflecting your own words back to you. For comparison, consider the following:
“You starvelling, you eel-skin, you dried neat’s-tongue, you bull’s-pizzle, you stock-fish!”
Now THAT'S an insult--again, crafted by one of the masters, William Shakespeare (Henry IV Part 1, Act 2, Scene 4). Compare and contrast to discover the difference between my reflection of your own avowed ignorance and actual insults.
For emphasis.
At this point, I'm beginning to wonder what lengths ARE necessary to help you understand your error(s). Apparently the emphasis was neither necessary nor sufficient to insure your understanding.
(Whatever it takes, it's going to take more than 12,000 characters, so your lesson continues below...)