Never mind that these holy books contradict one another.
Real religious books by Divine Authors don't contradict each other; people do.
I'm not looking for explanations on how to live. I determined that myself through the application of rational ethics.
From our dialogue so far your posts show you to be uncourteous, brash, and assumptive, whilst projecting your ego.
Because you don't take into account the ethical standard we could be down near Hell, you speak like a legal prosecutor; which in Hebrew is called Hasatan - The Accuser.
To put it in a simple format, Heaven is a place above us of unconditional loving beings, Hell is a place of unconditionally taking beings, we're somewhere between them realms in Middle Earth.
Therefore we have to look for where we are illogical, not look to challenge like a
being possessed with a need for revenge, it doesn't show insight to not find wisdom.
The Bible Says Hell is a Place Located Under the Earth
Chapter 16 – Bhagavad Gita
I have zero reason to believe what you are saying. Neither do you, but of the two of us, only I need one better than the mere will to believe - faith.
OK this is where it normally starts getting mental, when someone's ego starts projecting, and speaking for someone.
As a child I was told specific prophetic fulfilment from all the world's religions, at 5-6 years old that Yeshua didn't go around saying "
I Am", and the world had been deceived by this is self evident (
John,
Paul, and
Simon).
At 15 the Source of reality told me to read the religions, and I'd see the mysteries of the world, and it explained global eschatology; where this can be shown to be the same as it stated, in many religious texts globally.
At 21 I fulfilled Revelation 10, and was told how Yeshua came as a Snare by his Testimony (Isaiah 28:11-22), and that its closure all the demons will be removed (Isaiah 28).
I didn't read the Bible until 24, and then realized the things told to me in advanced detail as a child were correct; thus it isn't faith, it is knowledge, with confirmation via evidence.
No they don't. Consider Christianity. It teaches believers to despise unbelievers. Look at you running through this thread with your hair on fire calling others fools and stupid. Is that what you mean by being a better person?
OK, just stop, read the OP, understand the title of the OP.
Christianity is the Great Deception, it is a misrepresentation of Yeshua's teachings in the Synoptic Gospels, to turn it into a cult following the idol j+sēs - יסס in
John,
Paul, and
Simon.
This was prophesied in the Tanakh, and in Jude, James, Revelation, Quran, they all confirm the corruption took place; yet people don't read all the texts in the IQ morality test, else they'd know this.
The question of the OP is should we show Christians at a university level study of the religious texts online, that they've followed contradictions, as they're not wise enough to see, and could we use the internet, like Religious Forums to justify the debates?
Which god has advised man to trust reason and evidence over dogma, one of the great intellectual advances in the history of mankind?
There is just one Source to reality, all religions speak of it in different ways.
Imagine a jigsaw with each picture being a religious culture, and ideologies; they each speak about the same Source of reality, there isn't multiple realities.
The idea you think like this is very religious, do you get that? Like to perceive there is different Gods, different religious dogma over another, are religious ideals.
Sorry, but what you call wisdom, I call foolishness.
Proverbs 9:8 Don’t reprove a scoffer, lest he hate you. Reprove a wise person, and he will love you.
Isaiah 28:22 Now therefore don’t be scoffers, lest your bonds be made strong; for I have heard a decree of destruction from the Master, the Lord of Hosts on the whole earth.
The periodic table is mathematically divided by the different atomic structures, we can create new elements, and compounds by maths.
A Matrix is a mathematical grid for values to exist within, the periodic table, and therefore everything we look at in our reality is all a mathematical grid by definition.
And, of course, as usual, you missed the point: thousands of religions and god made up, one periodic table revealed by empiricism.
Sorry for not acknowledging your point, that you think this is a science vs religion debate...
I get you think that, and would like you to be more educated, to understand I use science, and maths to explain the reality; as well as religions, philosophy and anything else, that can be shown to create a logical idea of our reality.
Missing out data that we don't understand, is illogical.
Of course you do. All god-centered religion is faith-based.
Again ego is when we start speaking for someone.
Maybe you've missed I had a Near Death Experience at 21, and thus have met the Source of reality, and fulfilled Revelation 10 three years before reading the Bible at 24.
I do not have faith I've been to the Grand Canyon, I remember it, and can describe what I saw in graphic detail.
Nobody knows what you're talking about except that you thing you're a messiah, that we're close to hell, and that you think others should study religious texts.
Educated people understand, don't worry.
You care very much about converting others to your way of thinking. I don't. Feel free to dip a chicken talon in goat's blood, hammer it to a post, and dance around it all night shaking a stick while howling at the moon if that is what centers you and gives your life meaning, a moral grounding, and a framework for understanding the universe.
It means we can accept immoral behaviour, if we do not care to study if it is immoral; if people can believe what they want, this shows we allow child molestation for example, if it is in their religious texts.
If we're down near Hell, we can show this world is corrupt everywhere; the bigger something is, the more corruption there is.
To not assess if things are immoral, is a basic requirement for being moral.
I do not evangelize a single religion, I've read many texts, and accept all wisdom universally, I've no boundaries or labels.
Yet we need to recognize religions are there to teach us moral social boundaries in the past, and without a social cohesion, like any form of global social legal collapse, people become animals again.
Take into account the Torah means the Law, and in our modern society we follow a Legalistic system of society, that then governs social constraints; something always has to maintain order.
That's for church - you, know, "Jesus loves me this I know, 'cause the Bible tells me so." Repeat. Repeat again. That's propaganda. That's your world.
It is very clear you've been forcibly indoctrinated by Christianity, and I feel honestly sorry for you, I was as well, and know how it feels; yet to go opposite, and choose stupidity, when the text shows they are clearly hypocritical by definition of the examination papers, is not the logical way to proceed.
Which of your claims do you think you have convinced anybody of?
Why would I convince anyone, that is proselytizing, and that isn't allowed on here.
I'm trying to see if people can reason logically before the end of humanity as prophesied, and then after we understand why crazy people rejected logic in the Age to Come.
In my opinion.