Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Come on girl! You do realize how silly this sounds right? Who would baptize the thief? He would have remained on the cross until death. Christ did not say ...."Hold on let me get some water and then you'll be saved !" He simply said,......"today you will be with me in paradise." Which to most people means heaven. It shows that your belief alone and not the water is what saves you. And I might add by the way that you have not come up with a definition of paradise meaning anything other than heaven.AQUA: Do you actually know the theif wasn't baptised? You're making quite the assumption by saying that an unbaptised man went to "heaven".
Why? How many people who are in prison now do you think have been baptised? Christ ate with the tax collectors, because they were more humble. Why is it so hard to think that somebody who got baptised later committed a sin? I know I have sinned since I got baptised!Buttercup said:Come on girl! You do realize how silly this sounds right? Who would baptize the thief?
Oh, I think I understand what you're saying. I'm saying he got baptised before he was on the cross.He would have remained on the cross until death.
But how could it have been heaven? Three days later he had yet to ascend to his father in heaven. Christ did not go to heaven. Neither did the theif. He went to preach to the spirits in prison, as Paul says, and he had not yet been to heaven, as christ himself says.Christ did not say ...."Hold on let me get some water and then you'll be saved !" He simply said,......"today you will be with me in paradise." Which to most people means heaven.
That's probably because dictionaries aren't very good sources for doctrinal questions.It shows that your belief alone and not the water is what saves you. And I might add by the way that you have not come up with a definition of paradise meaning anything other than heaven.
How do you read that? It's like saying, "I am not here to teach you math, but to teach you spanish." That in no way means math is not important. But there's a certain division of labour between people. Paul was exceptionally good at preaching, so why should he do the baptising, too, when there are others to do it as well?1Corinthians 1:17
For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel....not with words of human wisdom lest the cross of Christ be emptied of its power.
It is the gospel of Christ and belief in and devotion to Christ that saves you. Not water. You basicallly are trying to empy Christ of HIS POWER by saying that mere water is part of the salvation process. Belief in Christ alone saves. The water does not.
Neither. They are not saved or not not saved. True salvation does not come until the final judgement. The FINAL judgement. That's right. There's more than one judgement. I still want to know what you make of that.Now, I would still like to see some scripture talking about this 'spirit prison' that you claim people go to who accept Christ as Savior but have not been baptized. So, are you saying they ARE or ARE NOT saved? There is something else they have to do simply because they were not immersed in water on earth?
Well, for the sake of simplicity, pretty much. There's no physical difference. It's all in the eye of the beholder.And....you say that people go to the spirit world after death. Is that the same thing to you as spirit prison?
Okay. Have a fun time wherever you are.I will be out of town for the rest of the day. We'll keep it going though right?
Aqua, I have to say that you are losing with this example of the thief on the cross. None of your rebuttals regarding this scripture I quote have shown me evidence of him being baptized. If you read the scripture previous to Luke 23: 42 you will understand that Jesus and the criminal do not get to know each other until they are hanging on the cross side by side. The thief could not have been baptised before that day.Oh, I think I understand what you're saying. I'm saying he got baptised before he was on the cross.
Yes, I did read it. And I choose to not take it out of context. Baptism is a good thing. I have never said it wasn't. But, it is not ESSENTIAL for salvation. Why would Paul say:Did you read the previous verses? Paul baptised a guy in the name of Christ.
I'm sorry, but this is flat out wrong Christian doctrine. Salvation comes the MOMENT you believe Christ to be Lord and Saviour. The final judgement is for the entire world to determine our earthly works and for those non believers to receive their sentence so to speak. We will have already made our decision for Christ or against him WHILE WE WERE ALIVE. You cannot be saved after you die. It's here on earth or nowhere! You are wrong here. I am very adamant about that. You CANNOT be saved after you die.True salvation does not come until the final judgement. The FINAL judgement. That's right. There's more than one judgement. I still want to know what you make of that.
In Christ's parable of Lazarus and the rich man, it was Lazarus who found himself in the special place (the Bosom of Abraham). To say that a dead person was in that place was the same as saying that he was righteous, because only the righteous went to Paradise to wait with Abraham.
I'm not saying he did get baptised. i'm just saying it's a little hasty of you to say that he didn't get baptised. After all, you haven't shown any scripture showing me that he has.Buttercup said:Aqua, I have to say that you are losing with this example of the thief on the cross. None of your rebuttals regarding this scripture I quote have shown me evidence of him being baptized.
Why is that? Is Jesus the only one who baptises people? IN fact, I can't think of one instance of Jesus baptising anybody. However, in Matthew 3:5 it says "Then went out to him [John the Baptist] Jerusalem, and all Judaea, and all the region round about Jordan." Who's to say the theif wasn't one of those people who was baptised by John?If you read the scripture previous to Luke 23: 42 you will understand that Jesus and the criminal do not get to know each other until they are hanging on the cross side by side. The thief could not have been baptised before that day.
The theif wasn't saved! Paradise is not heaven!!! Remember the passage I keep quoting to you, about how after Jesus's resurection (that is, after the theif had been with Jesus in paradise) that Jesus says that he has not yet ascended to his father? You continue to ignore that passage. That passage is proof that paradise is not the same thing as heaven, and that therefore the theif was not "saved" because he didn't go to heaven.Here's the scene.....There are two criminals along with Jesus being crucified that day. One believes him to be God (vs. 40), the other does not and rebukes Christ. The thief says, "Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom." Jesus answered him, "I tell you the truth, today you will be with me in paradise." There is no time to baptize the thief, nor would anyone knowing Jesus be allowed to baptize the thief. AND, Jesus does not say to the thief, "Now you must be baptized for your salvation to go into effect." No, he tells him he will be with him later that day......in paradise. The thief does not need to do one more thing to be saved. He believed in Christ as God and that was enough.
That was what was crucial for Paul to be doing, yes. John, on the other hand, was sent to baptise people and thereby pave the way for Christ. For him, baptism was crucial, not preaching the gospel.Notice the highlighted words....THAT is what's crucial, not baptism. It is very clear to me!
Oh? Could you give the scriptural reference that states that at the moment of belief one is now automatically saved?I'm sorry, but this is flat out wrong Christian doctrine. Salvation comes the MOMENT you believe Christ to be Lord and Saviour.
Then why in heaven's name did Christ waste all that time going to preach to the spirits in prison, as Peter mention in 1 Pet 3:19, when there was no hope for them to be saved anyway? Does christ seem like the kind of person who would a) waste his time or b) would be mislead about when salvation takes place?The final judgement is for the entire world to determine our earthly works and for those non believers to receive their sentence so to speak. We will have already made our decision for Christ or against him WHILE WE WERE ALIVE. You cannot be saved after you die. It's here on earth or nowhere! You are wrong here. I am very adamant about that. You CANNOT be saved after you die.
Righteous=Saved.
That's right, but that's not to say that the righteous get saved immediately after they die.This is your quote remember!
Really? Was the theif in heaven when he was on the cross with Christ?When Jesus tells the thief he will be in Paradise that day....what Jesus means is that he will be with HIm. Don't you see that anywhere with Christ is Heaven?
Well, good, maybe this will show you that you're thinking is wrong. I am trying to prove it, but you continue to ignore certain key scriptures (1 Pet 3:19, John 20:17, John 3:6, etc.).And I have never in my life thought of it as a place that you go to be baptised or to continue proving, proving, proving that you love God. The place to prove it is HERE, NOW.
It only perfectly illustrates it if a) you assume rather hastily that the theif was not baptised, b) disregard John 20:17, and c) assume that paradise is the same thing as heaven (which goes along with (b))Buttercup said:I think you are really misreading the thief story. The reason I keep coming back to that example is because I think it illustrates perfectly our point of argument.
I want you to tell me why you think John 20:17 and 3:6 were lies.You say you have to be baptized in order to be saved, I say you don't. To me, the thief on the cross story is a great, simple example of someone believing Christ was God who wasn't baptized while alive but went on to be with him in Paradise. What more do you want?
I think he did. After all, he knew Christ did nothing wrong. It was wrong to say you were the son of god if you weren't, yet the theif knew he was telling the truth. That's knowing something.The criminal did not know Christ before his crucifixion.
We cannot conclude that at all. You're making horribly huge jumps of conclusion.We can conclude from these lines that the man was not baptized before or after his death.
I could ask you the same thing. Why won't you see that the thief was not necessarily unbaptised. Why won't you see that the theif did not go to heaven, but rather to some other place. Why won't you give me answers to the questions I've asked in a billion different posts about if we go to heaven right when we die, and if so why is there is a judgement and what was paul speaking of when he spoke of the third heaven.Why won't you see that?
If it were really that important of an example of that, I'm sure they would have been a bit clearer about whether or not he was baptised.This is a very important example of someone going to paradise to be with Christ who wasn't baptized.
I ddidn't think we were debating anything other than the baptismal issue. :areyoucraNow, as for the rest of your most recent post.....I don't want to debate any point other than the baptismal issue because I am learning as we go that we have vast differences in our beliefs of Christian doctrine. We would be in here debating for 20 years!
Go to www.lds.org and up at the top there is a search bar. Type in spirit world. You should get a lot of hits.I think for me to be able to continue I need more information. I am not familiar with this place you go if you haven't been baptized so it's hard for me to refute answers if I know nothing about the subject. Can you tell me where you find the answer to this? I need to know where it states in the bible that you go to spirit prison if not baptized on earth. Where do you get that information and draw that conclusion? I have not read anything that states to the effect of: "If not baptized on earth, you go here." If you could show me an example of that, I can comment on the subject further...otherwise, I don't know what else to say! If you need me to clairfy anything just PM me.
And you're not by saying HE WAS baptized? Are you not jumping to conclusions by saying he was? There is more evidence from these sentences to substantiate my point than yours.Aqualung said:We cannot conclude that at all. You're making horribly huge jumps of conclusion.
No, I am not saying that he was. I'm just saying we cannot conclusively say that he wasn't. Of course, my doctrine doesn't rest on him being baptised. But yours does rest on him not being baptised. I'm just saying it's a little hasty to base your entire doctrine (since you refused to say how your doctrine accounted for the billions of questions I posted) when we don't even know he wasn't baptised.Buttercup said:And you're not by saying HE WAS baptized? Are you not jumping to conclusions by saying he was? There is more evidence from these sentences to substantiate my point than yours.
Well, if you're going to quit, the least you could do is actually answer the questions I've asked you. It would be very disrespectful not to.I can see that we are not going to agree on this subject even if we went on for 20 pages.
I know that, but you have yet to show me why you believe that (except for a doctrine based on a huge conclusion) and why you can believe that in spite of the numerous things I have showed you.I believe, and most of Christsendom believes, that baptism is a good thing and advisable but it is not ESSENTIAL for salvation.
I can totally relate and this is one of my pet peeves about the computer.Aqualung said::banhead3 ARGH!! I just typed up a huge long response and it got lost!!!! :banghead3 Okay, I'll have to answer you later. I'm too mad now. :banghead3
The unanswered questions:Buttercup said:I can totally relate and this is one of my pet peeves about the computer.
And what question have I not answered to your satisfaction?
I have to get some work done. :149: I'll be back!
Okay, I'll tell you why they have to do with the topic at hand.Buttercup said:Wow, I thought we were supposed to stay on topic? I just warned you about that. Almost all the questions you ask above are not about baptism. All that I wanted to talk about in this debate was baptism being necessary for salvation. I have covered that. Unless you want to get into a battle of scriptures.
As I have said....you and I will have many differences in beliefs. This is part of the reason why the LDS and most other Christian churches have conflicts. We don't believe you can be saved after you die....you do.
You brought up that you thought it was stupid to require baptism for salvation because some people will happen to die right before they get baptised. I said people could get baptised after death. You said people couldn't be saved after death. I brought up these quotes and you failed to asnwer.Aqualung said:Why would Christ go to preach to the spirits in prison as mentioned in 1 Pet 3:19 and 1 Pet 4:6 if salvation were not possible after death?
This is very on topic. If baptism is not necessary, why did Christ get baptised? Why would he waste his time with an unnecessary thing?Aqualung said:Why do you think Christ himself would waste his time with an unnecessary expression of his faithfulness? After all, he already knew he would later have to show his faithfulness by enduring crucifixtion. Why this extra "baptism" thing if it weren't necessary?
All these quotes state that baptism is necessary (excpet the peter quote, which states that people can be saved after they die).Aqualung said:What am I to make of Mark 16:16, John 3:5, Acts 2:38, Acts 10:48, and 1 Pet 3:21?
This is directly related to the proposition that all you need for salvation is to believe in christ, and that those who do not believe will be cast into hell, and that there is no salvation after death.What happens to all the people who are either born before Christ or are born in places where the name of Christ is unknown? If all non-believers are cast into hell (because there is no salvation after death and because unbelief is the only unpardonable sin), are all those guys just out of luck? Do they just coincidentally have to suffer in hell for all eternity?
This is in argument to your thief story. You stated it was obvious that one does not need baptism because the thief "got saved". I brought up those scriptural references up to show that Jesus did not go to Heaven, and that therefore the thief, who went where Jesus went (today you shall be with me...), was not saved baptism-free.Aqulaung said:When Christ told the thief "Today you will be with me in paradise" how could this have mean heaven as you take it to mean if a) 1 Pet 3:19 states Christ did not go to heaven but rather went to preach to the spirits in prison and b) in John 20:17 he tells somebody that he has not yet ascended to his father (he has not yet gone to heaven)?
This has more to do with your proposition that one cannot be saved after death.Aqualung said:What do you make of 2 Cor 12:2? This seems to show that it is a little more complicated than just heaven and hell.
Same as above.Aqualung said:What is the purpose of the Final judgement? Does God just let "probably clean" people into his kingdom when no unclean thing can enter into the kingdom of heaven? Why two judgements if you're just ending up in the same place anyway?
This is challenging your belief that a non-baptised man "got saved".Aqualung said:How do you know the thief wasn't baptised before he became a thief?
I have produced many biblical quotes that state you need baptism for salvation, and you have yet to propose one that states that you are saved the moment you accept Christ into your life.Aqualung said:What is the scriptural basis for saying that salvation comes at the moment you accept christ into your heart?
No you haven't.Buttercup said:I have answered all these questions dear.
But why? All you have done so far is tell me you do not believe in salvation after death. When I give you evidence that you can be saved after death, you just repeat, "I do not believe in salvation after death." There has to be some reason you believe this, and I want to know why.Buttercup said:I do not believe in salvation after death.
But why? All you have done so far is tell me you do not believe in salvation after death. When I give you evidence that you can be saved after death, you just repeat, "I do not believe baptism is necessary for salvation." There has to be some reason you believe this, and I want to know why.Buttercup said:I do not believe baptism is necessary for salvation.
You have shown 2 scriptures that you say do not back up the fact that baptism is necessary. I have showed you probably cause that you are wrong about both. You have yet to refute those claims with something more than, "You are wrong, I am right, and that's that."Buttercup said:I have shown many scripture quotes backing my claims....
Then DO IT. All doctrinal battles should be based in scripture, not in simple, "I believe it is so, and therefore it is so."Buttercup said:And I have said before I don't want to get into a battle of scripture quotes, but I could produce them!
And why is your interpretation better? I think I've done a pretty good of backing up my interpretation, but you fail to do so.Buttercup said:.....it's all about INTERPRETATION.
Buttercup said:I have to say something here that you may not like....It is an incorrect idea to think that water has anything to do with salvation.[/qutoe]
Yet it remains just that - a mere saying. Back it up. And then when I refute, back up your claims that I'm wrong.
But why is that incorrect? What scripture leads you to believe that? You have yet to produce it, although I have produced a number for my side.Buttercup said:Why do you think people fight the LDS church? There is one reason. It is incorrect to think you can be saved after death.
But why do you say it is correct? Once again, you claim things but show absolutely no support for these beliefs, although I have shown support for my beliefs.Buttercup said:Why do you think people fight the LDS church? There is another reason. Baptising the dead is incorrect thinking as well. You cannot be saved after death.
It is going nowhere because you refuse to support your claims with anything at all. I keep asking for your reasons, and you keep withholding them from me. No wonder it's getting nowhere! You insist on keeping it at a standstill.Buttercup said:I feel like this debate is going around in circles and that I am hitting a brick wall...sorry, no offense. I don't think we'll get anywhere. I mean, look, we're at 4 pages and nothing settled yet!
Is that it? You're leaving without saying one thing at all?! Wow. I thought you would be at least a little bit more able to support your beliefs than this... I'm a little disappointed.Buttercup said:Peace Out....and thank you!