Doesn't that technicality miss the pointUkraine isn't first world.
that lowly personal firearms can be useful?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Doesn't that technicality miss the pointUkraine isn't first world.
Thanks to those who supplied arms, training, and those who assisted in hobbling the invasion.Ukraine isn't first world.
Also, I'm not sure how civilians with shotguns and hunting rifles could've helped repel an actual military (even one as ****ty as Russia's) who have tanks, mortars, etc.
Doesn't that technicality miss the point
that lowly personal firearms can be useful?
Good.I'm not anti-gun per se.
Thanks to those who supplied arms, training, and those who assisted in hobbling the invasion.
While I agree with your assessment, I'm sure it still helps with the resistance efforts.
I believe that a gun of any type should require licensing, including thorough training and testing. Also, a civilian doesn't need a bullet hose for hunting, self defense, or sport. The 2nd Amendment doesn't necessarily mean any and all arms. For example, if restricting high capacity rifles violates the 2nd Amendment, then wouldn't the ban on rocket propelled grenades already be in violation of it? Where should the line be drawn? A nuclear warhead is an arm, which is obviously a very extreme example, but even the staunchest 2A supporter wouldn't bemoan it's unavailability on the civilian market. 2A would still be intact even if muskets were the only type of gun available.Good.
A constitutional originalist (like this groundskeeper)I believe that a gun of any type should require licensing, including thorough training and testing. Also, a civilian doesn't need a bullet hose for hunting, self defense, or sport. The 2nd Amendment doesn't necessarily mean any and all arms. For example, if restricting high capacity rifles violates the 2nd Amendment, then wouldn't the ban on rocket propelled grenades already be in violation of it? Where should the line be drawn? A nuclear warhead is an arm, which is obviously a very extreme example, but even the staunchest 2A supporter wouldn't bemoan it's unavailability on the civilian market. 2A would still be intact even if muskets were the only type of gun available.
I think an untrained civilian resistance armed only with civilian market guns should be a last resort, otherwise civilians would be better off avoiding contract with hostiles and let the military handle it. Don't want to draw fire and have your home and family shelled.
Makes one wonder what you're so afraid of then and why you seem so obsessed with her.That's New York for you.
Corruption has many facets, not at least of which creates internal strife.
Ousted Democratic campaign chairman slams AOC for attack on state party leadership
At least Republicans gained some in-roads admist the entrenchment. Thank you AOC.
She's incredibly insignificant and ineffective anyways. None of her bills ever passed making this a harmless inconvenience at best. Her district can fester and rot for all I care. They actually deserve each other.
We've seen tons of dudes slaughter children with a gun in their hand.I never saw a gun go out and slaughter children. Must be a new, robotic AI gun?
Cars are heavily regulated. The use of cars is heavily regulated.Cars still comes with an acceptable death count nonetheless.
What is the acceptable death count for guns to where they can become unvillified as cars are?
Neither guns nor cars are as well regulatedCars are heavily regulated. The use of cars is heavily regulated.
Agreed.Neither guns nor cars are as well regulated
as they should be (IMO). The number of
deaths per year in USA is close.
I know it's a rather short post to frubal.Agreed.
Force every driver in the nation to keep log books, HOS compliance, and random safety inspections throughout the nation. It works for trucks. It will work for cars.Neither guns nor cars are as well regulated
as they should be (IMO). The number of
deaths per year in USA is close.
Possibly.Force every driver in the nation to keep log books, HOS compliance, and random safety inspections throughout the nation. It works for trucks. It will work for cars.
It is because she is rather hot for a politician and he probably has conflicting desires.Makes one wonder what you're so afraid of then and why you seem so obsessed with her.
Actually i was joking but I wouldn't put it past today's authoritarians to eventually push something like that.Possibly.
But I can see useful intermediate measures,
eg, more stringent requirements for drivers
of high performance cars & anyone towing
a trailer.
It is because she is rather hot for a politician and he probably has conflicting desires.
Actually i was joking but I wouldn't put it past today's authoritarians to eventually push something like that.
They did it with trucks after all.