exchemist
Veteran Member
Er, well, you get more data points, obviously. So the data set self-evidently does change with time. And the models get better as they are refined.So you think data changes over time?
So a person that bangs on about 15 yr old data presented by an unqualified, long-dead person, which may have been cherry-picked to serve an agenda, is not going to get anyone terribly motivated to dig into it.
And as there is, from your feeble list of supposedly ostracised scientists, zero evidence of any conspiracy to frighten climatologists into accepting a party line, I think we can take what they have to say seriously.