ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
Again, this isn't a school debate. You're rambling.Then it's up to the Negative Team to demonstrate how it's "rambling."
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Again, this isn't a school debate. You're rambling.Then it's up to the Negative Team to demonstrate how it's "rambling."
I speak Russian, so I would be ok with the Soviet Union.Mister Non-Specific
here's my list of ten Capitalist countries I am happy to live in - in order of preference
Australia (mine)
New Zealand
USA
England
Canada
France
Germany
Sweden
Denmark
Norway
and ten Communist countries you must prefer
former Soviet Union
East Germany
Bulgaria
Poland
China
Vietnam
Cambodia
Cuba
North Korea
Laos
Which country would you prefer to live in?
I speak Russian, so I would be ok with the Soviet Union.
Vietnam and Laos were ravaged by America, so probably not.
The DPRK is being sanction for no conceivable reason by most of the world, so not that one.
Poland and Bulgaria would be fine.
Same with China.
Still, nothing can beat Cuba and its long and storied revolutionary history.
Nothing, that is, except early 1900's Russia.
So either early 1900's Russia or Cuba.
Again, this isn't a school debate. You're rambling.
Aye, they did. They weren't communist countries, so they would've been excluded from the list.I believe America "ravaged" Japan too, and Germany.
*cough cough* McCarthyism *cough cough*Love to see Russia, but I aint living in any Communist
country where you queue for shoddy goods, have people
spying on you, and keep your mouth firmly shut.
Aye, they did. They weren't communist countries, so they would've been excluded from the list.
*cough cough* McCarthyism *cough cough*
Since you deliberately ignore almost all of my challenges, questions and arguments and only seem to respond to the odd sentence, it's pretty obvious who out of the two of us isn't debating in good faith and isn't debating reasonably.Team A on the Religiousforums - "You are rambling"
Team B on the Religiousforums - "No, you are rambling"
Same thing. Lack of specificity, ad hominems, shouting
down the opposition and all other due process of stating
a point and logical fallacies are forms of weakness.
One set of foundation premises of Liberalism is connected to revisionist history.
I think you have confused "liberalism" with "conservatism."One set of foundation premises of Liberalism is connected to revisionist history.