Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
A nuclear warhead is an arm, but no Second Amendment advocate is complaining about civilians not having legal access to them. It's obviously an extreme example, but it does illustrate that a line is drawn somewhere. So where?
Where is going to depend upon the time that one lives in. The mass shootings are bad enough, but they are nothing compared to the everyday homicides with guns. Both could be solved if some of the legal loopholes no longer existed.. Let's keep things largely as they are. Support the Second Amendment and all that. If a person is not a felon as long as one is not facing mental or criminal issues owning a gun should not be a problem. What we need to do is to cut down on guns that end up in criminal hands. Granted, we will not be able to eliminate all of them. But the we can't eliminate all of them attitude only guarantees a glut of guns on the market. Stolen firearms are often sold rather cheaply since the person that stole almost never wants it and if he has a record it is just another charge. If guns were harder to steal the number of stolen guns would go down. Think of how many cars would be stolen if anyone could hop in a car and drive off. It is not that bad with guns, but you do not need a key to start a gun.
So proposition one, no buying guns unless the owner has a safe place to store it. One cannot force him to use it but one cannot use a gun safe that does not exist.
Proposition two, for hand guns especially one needs to be properly screened before one can own one. Once again tp satisfy our Second Amendment supporters is that only mental illness or a criminal history or on going case (if one just got charged with domestic violence gun ownership would be banned at least temporarily) would stop someone from buying a gun. Second felons of non-violent crimes would need a legal pathway to re-earn the right to own a weapon. If one was in a nonviolent crime and could show that one had reformed gun ownership should be possible again.
Proposition three, no person to person sales. It will raise the price but all sales would have to go through a dealership to make sure that these laws were followed.
That would minimize cases like the one that @F1fan mentioned. Anything else? Any objections? Places like this can be sources or at least aids to new legislation.