Prometheus85
Active Member
that’s all u got?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Marie Yavanovitch Testimony
- Thread starter Prometheus85
- Start date
that’s all u got?
BSM1
What? Me worry?
Actually it's all I need..
Of course that does not matter because of who said it. His followers don't care what he says or does.
BSM1
What? Me worry?
And how does that make you feel.....
It's always about sammiches with them, eh.
Jollybear
Hey
No its not a bold face lie. Its true, i proved it true. So you have a bold face denial going on. Theres no cure for zombeism.
What the hell are you gibberjabering about here?
Oh hush! No they wer not. They asked there question and she said YES, in direct contradiction to what she said prior! The leghths you lefties go too in order to atleast say something. Youl say anything. But by doing so, you make your dwnial so obvious and that makes you look bad. If it wasnt for our debate being public, id be more pissed off. But, fill up, make yourself look bad.
Yes, she lied, and im going to repost her lie below.
Oh, ok, so you admit hunter, burisma was brought up to her then! Lol. Ok.....you lefties, you never clue in.
Oh my god! Lol, now your saying biden DID corruption! Wow, great admittence coming from someone who kept saying biden did nothing wrong! Lol.
Hows trump corrupt here when you just legitimized trumps call to investigate the bidens by just calling the bidens corrupt!? Lol, only lefties! I swear!
Mayby we could "get it" if youd stop PRETENDING your charge of a right wing source is full of **** merely because you call them right wing and merely because you consider truth based on your feelings. Instead address the arguments, points and documentation the right wing source points out. If you dont do that, then your not credable nor deserving of even respect.
I didnt miss that at all. In fact i quoted to you both her contradictory statements.
Ok, one more time
Yovanovitch said, "although I have met former vice president Joe Biden several times over the course of our many years in government service, neither he nor the previous administration ever raised the issue of either Burisma or Hunter Biden with me."
And
The first time you personally became aware of Burisma was actually when you were being prepared by the Obama State Department for your Senate confirmation hearings, and this was in the form of practice questions and answers," Stefanik told the former ambassador. "This was your deposition. And you testified in this particular practice Q & A with the Obama State Department, it wasn't just generally about Burisma and corruption. It was specifically about Hunter Biden and Burisma. Is that correct?"
Yovanovitch answered, "Yes. It is."
She LIED.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
Um that's because the Republicans were disruptive and kept trying to talk out of turn.
There are rules, ya know.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
As usual, you didn't prove anything.
Sounds like you need to watch those 7 hours again, as pointed out by another poster who refuted your lying claim.
BSM1
What? Me worry?
That's disgusting and alarming?
Sooo...you sayin' you get offended easily?
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
Um no.
Prometheus85
Active Member
someone is either being extremely dishonest or just flat out lying. I’d say both.
Prometheus85
Active Member
Exactly. All he did was copy and paste some BS from some right wing blog. I don’t understand how someone says they watched 7hrs of testimony and say she lied by using to statements that don’t coincide with eachother. One statement was apart of her opening testimony and the other was an answer to a question the republicans bought up several times which was, how she first heard about joe Biden and the company in her briefings before her senate confrimation heelarings. Which means she had no idea about it perviously.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
I know, I don't get it.
I watched the entire thing and concur with your description of how it went down.
Riders
Well-Known Member
There was also another person who testified friday or whenever she did but it was not in open court. They said he had direct evidence, he over heard the conversation with Trump on the phone.I wonder where Republicans are getting the misinformation that people testifying do not have direct evidence.?
BSM1
What? Me worry?
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
Extremely interesting, imo, and very damning of Trump's and his defender's actions. We well know what Trump was trying to do and why, so her testimony only adds more fuel to the fire.
What was truly funny is that the next morning I watched Fox & Friends for a bit, and they were falling all over themselves trying to distort & twist things to defend Trump and make the Dem congresspeople bad. And then one of the newswomen referred to "we conservatives...", which just goes to show how "objective" they are.
Riders
Well-Known Member
Jollybear
Hey
No they wernt disruptive lier! Thats a flagrant lie!
Actually, my last post to him refuted HIM. Its not the other way around.
But hey, i saw you both talking about my post to eachother. Fill up, keep reinforcing eachother into your BS.
Prometheus85
Active Member
No it didn’t. You just copied and pasted some right wing nonsense. Which I find odd. Because you allegedly watched the whole 7hours of her testimony and yet came to the conclusion that she lied based on two statements that were taken outta context but right wing media.
In any case here’s a clip of her being asked about her Being briefed on hunter Biden prior to her senate confrimation hearings.