Which is irrelevant to whether Special Prosecutor Mueller’s investigation will produce more indictments. There will be no more indictments coming from his investigation.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Which is irrelevant to whether Special Prosecutor Mueller’s investigation will produce more indictments. There will be no more indictments coming from his investigation.
Nah. Collusion would be when some people get together and fabricate a malicious and false report about a Candidate and then have their fellow travelers in the media trumpet it just before an election. You know, like the Steele dossier.Wink wink nudge nudge. Say no more, say no more. A wink is as good as a nudge to a blind bat.
But I call BS. Manafort gave that information with the intention to help the Russians interfere with the U.S. election. He knew this information would reach Russian intelligence and he knew they would use it.
That’s collusion to me.
"There will be no more indictments filed by Mueller on this investigation" <> "there will be no more indictments coming from this investigation."Which is irrelevant to whether Special Prosecutor Mueller’s investigation will produce more indictments. There will be no more indictments coming from his investigation.
Nah. Collusion would be when some people get together and fabricate a malicious and false report about a Candidate and then have their fellow travelers in the media trumpet it just before an election. You know, like the Steele dossier.
Of course. Fact check dot org says so, so it must be the gospel truth.No. Obama didn't do those things. That's already been discussed on this thread, and I already cited a few sources that all indicate the claim Obama was doing it is a bunch of bull.
Which is irrelevant to whether Special Prosecutor Mueller’s investigation will produce more indictments. There will be no more indictments coming from his investigation.
How is wishing to see justice being done vindictiveness? And why do so many people have such a hard time understanding that Mueller never could have indicted the President?Outside of vindictiveness, what would be the point?
Seems to me this whole thing is about the Dems refusing to accept the fact that he won the 2016 election. Frankly, I'll laugh my butt off if the wins in 2020, too.
There are ISIS believers still there, no doubt. But they have no territory.Nah. I'm sure they're really still there - just hiding in their burkas. Go to "fact check dot org" for some real proof.
A powerful New York real estate developer and businessman like Donald J. Trump is somebody who did get around; he's probably dealt with some mob bosses. Any business dealings between Trump and Russian mobsters likely happened long ago, probably way past the statue of limitations.
Just heard on NPR that the report is big bunch'o letdown.
So I searched & found.....
The Latest: White House calls report 'complete exoneration'
Hmmm....those aren't the questions which come to my mind.Yep. It will be interesting to see how this plays out politically. Will it corrode trust on the left in government while emboldening Trumps coziness with anti democratic leaders? Etc...
When Hillary becomes President?I wonder how soon this affair will settle down to the point we can rely upon cromulent info.
She'd open new hearings while continuing the old.When Hillary becomes President?