• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Trump's Purpose

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
To a large extent, yes. This is what Putin & Co have been at least trying to do with the EU, NATO, and us. The weaker we get, the stronger Putin and Russia gets. And, unfortunately, Trump is helping him, although maybe not intentionally.

I'm not sure if that's their intentions. At least looking at the past few decades since the fall of the Soviet Union (and taking into consideration their entire history where they've mostly had to defend against invaders), their actions could be just as easily interpreted as defensive in nature. The West hasn't been exactly innocent in their dealings with the Russians, so if there's hostility between us, then we're just as much to blame as they are.

In some ways, if America and Russia forged closer ties with each other, it might even help both nations. Keep in mind that a large part of our problems with the rest of world have been indirectly caused by animosity between the U.S. and Russia. If not for that, then we would never have gotten involved in places like Vietnam, nor would we have any problems with nations like Iran or North Korea today. Other countries have taken advantage of the enmity between the superpowers, and both America and Russia have been worse off as a result. A friendlier relationship with Russia could actually strengthen America's position in the world.
 

esmith

Veteran Member
I find it quite funny that those that are going hermantile about Russia are the same ones that praised the Obama when he rebuked Romney about his comments about Russia.
They also had no problem when the Obama was real chummy with Russia as he spoke with Medvedve and was caught on an open mike.
They also had no problems with Russian contributions to the Clinton Foundation.
They also had no problem with the Obama not enforcing prohibitions on chemical weapons by Assad
They also had no problem with the Obama canceling U.S. missile defense in Eastern Europe to appease the now evil threatening Russians
They also had no problem with the Obama allowing Russia to sell S-300 air defense systems to Iran
They also had no problem with the Obama inaction on Russia violating the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty

But of course the main reason is that one of their darlings did not win the 2016 election.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I think we really need to start analyzing the uglier parts of TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome), Trumpophobic comments are expected but grand conspiracies are taking it to a new level.
Reminds me of a friend who had ODS.
He was convinced that Obama was a Marxist Muslim plant installed to subvert us.
Too many people lose all sense of proportion when they hate a president.
My friend with ODS.....he's just like the anti-Trumpers, the only difference being tribe.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
He was not the first President to shut down the government; nor was it only presidents that do this. For instance, the Democrats under Obama shut down the government in 2013. Where was the outcry. The rest of your post is pure partisan speculation with absolutely no proof. Can you say 'TDS'?
You misunderstand.
The Republicans shut down government back then.
It's always them because they're the only side
which refuses to give Democrats what they want.
Clear now?
 
Last edited:

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Obama publicly endorsed Macron and urged the French to vote for him. Was it a conspiracy by Obama to cause disruption in France and undermine their democracy?

Jerry Lewis
Are you truly this oblivious to Trump's behavior?
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
He was not the first President to shut down the government; nor was it only presidents that do this. For instance, the Democrats under Obama shut down the government in 2013. Where was the outcry. The rest of your post is pure partisan speculation with absolutely no proof. Can you say 'TDS'?

You can say whatever you want. And you should expect the corresponding effect on your credibility and reputation.
 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
Do you think the Russians want to ruin the U.S. economy? To what purpose?
Putin has always wanted to undermine U.S. style democracy, it helps him maintain his power if he can point to the west and say, “see, their system is no better”. If he can show that the west is incompetent or corrupt he counts that as a success. He has been very successful lately.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
You misunderstand.
The Republicans shut down government back then.
It's always them because they're the only side
which refuses to give Democrats what they want.
Clear now?
At this point I really don't know whether you can understand things or not.

The evidence is very contradictory.
 

viole

Ontological Naturalist
Premium Member
I very bright friend of mine, with a couple of degrees says that Trump was elected to ruin the American economy. Perhaps that's why both the Republicans and the Democrats essentially do nothing?

A couple of degrees (fever) above the normal?

Ciao

- viole
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
He was not the first President to shut down the government; nor was it only presidents that do this. For instance, the Democrats under Obama shut down the government in 2013. Where was the outcry. The rest of your post is pure partisan speculation with absolutely no proof. Can you say 'TDS'?





No real answer, huh? Can you say 'TDS'?
The fact is that you don't like facts about Trump. But here:
Opinion | President Trump’s Lies, the Definitive List

and here: The Many Scandals of Donald Trump: A Cheat Sheet - The Atlantic

and here: Opinion | Trump’s Corruption: The Definitive List

and here: Here are 10 times President Trump's comments have been called racist

and here: Legal affairs of Donald Trump - Wikipedia

Of course, I'm likely to see your next post saying "fake news", which is just a very convenient way for you to avoid facts. Also, there are numerous articles about Trump's immoral words and behavior in the Wall Street Journal, and they are hardly "leftists".
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
A friendlier relationship with Russia could actually strengthen America's position in the world.
Except they are hardly "friendly" when they invade countries, interfere with elections, poison opposing politicians, etc. And should we really trust a former KGB agent that our intelligence agencies tell us that they have evidence of money laundering?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I recommend less neutrality. It is not good for you.
I know that we have fundamentally different approaches.
You have a tribe...you defend it, & attack the other.
(You'd fit in with most Americastanians better than I do.)
But neutrality affords more peace & emotional detachment.
This serves objectivity.
 

Stanyon

WWMRD?
Except they are hardly "friendly" when they invade countries, interfere with elections, poison opposing politicians, etc.

Are you talking about the U.S. because we have done or attempted to do all three.
-Poison Castro?
-We helped put Saddam in power
-We helped put Diem in power
- We supported oppressive regimes in Latin America and the Middle East
-Far-Right Nationalists in the Ukraine?
Etc. Etc. Etc.
But of course it's all in the name of American values.

That being said, we train and arm guerillas to overthrow governments, support dictators, and help foment discord when it is seen to benefit the U.S. It's also a reality that other countries do the same thing to support their own interests.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Are you talking about the U.S. because we have done or attempted to do all three.
-Poison Castro?
-We helped put Saddam in power
-We helped put Diem in power
- We supported oppressive regimes in Latin America and the Middle East
-Far-Right Nationalists in the Ukraine?
Etc. Etc. Etc.
But of course it's all in the name of American values.

That being said, we train and arm guerillas to overthrow governments, support dictators, and help foment discord when it is seen to benefit the U.S. It's also a reality that other countries do the same thing to support their own interests.
I am very aware of our many atrocities along those lines as I taught about it for 36 years, but I am not willing to roll over and play dead for Putin. If that's what you want to do, adios and enjoy your stay in sunny Russia.
 

Stanyon

WWMRD?
I recommend less neutrality.

In the Malleus Maleficarum it is suggested that inquisitors not look into a suspected witches eyes while they were torturing them so as to not be bewitched. An interesting way to reduce the reality of what they were doing to another human being, no room left for mercy or humanity.
 
Top