I suggest you watch the following video from the Qaim as he explains the question you addressed in details:
Sorry, it's this one. You can watch the one I posted in quote also to better understand the concept addressed
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I suggest you watch the following video from the Qaim as he explains the question you addressed in details:
Surah Haqah refutes this. This is a freemasonic old interpretation of Mohammad as a Nabi. This is disbelief in Nubuwa.Sorry, it's this one. You can watch the one I posted in quote also to better understand the concept addressed
NpSorry, it's this one. You can watch the one I posted in quote also to better understand the concept addressed
I have seen all his episodes.
"He is telling that Muhhamad is the Manifestation of God.
"Allah and Muhhamad are one
Allah is Muhhamad
Muhhamad is Allah"
In the other episode that you referenced , he avoids the question, so is Quran created or uncreated?
Then in other episodes he says that Jesus is the angel Gabriel.
His theology does not stand.
He avoids answering fundemental Questions.
Surah Haqah refutes this. This is a freemasonic old interpretation of Mohammad as a Nabi. This is disbelief in Nubuwa.
The proof of prophethood is massive following and fundamental teachings.
What is the problem with my statement?I very much doubt that statement of yours
This is shirk,according to authentic strong Hadiths.Yes he does. Aba Sadiq from him is peace is saying that Muhammad saw is Allah in creation
I know that , but not like you do.No he doesn't avoid the question. He says that Quran was inspiration to Muhammad saw.
For sure , he will be challangedWe have a stance that Quran that you know today is not the complete Quran and that Qaim will come with the complete Quran when he rises
Yes he does. Archangel Gabriel is sixth member of Ahlul Kisa-People of the cloak
Well he is teaching in his episodes , did not to this daz that he is challanged.That's something that you made up
1.What is the problem with my statement?
Because i don't agree and question what he says?
2.This is shirk,according to authentic strong Hadiths.
3.I know that , but not like you do.
4.For sure , he will be challanged
We will see how he stands.
5."The Messenger of Allah (saw) also said, ’The Prophets were presented to me, and Musa (as) was a thin man, it was as if he was from the men of Shanu’ah [a Yemeni tribe]. And I saw ’Isa ibn Maryam (as), and the closest of the people in resemblance to him from those I have seen, is ‘Urwah ibn Mas‘†d (ra). And I saw Ibrahim (as), and the closest of the people in resemblance to him, from those I have seen, is your companion [meaning himself]. And I saw Jibril [as], and the closest of the people in resemblance to him, from those I have seen, is Dihyah (ra)’ (Tirmidhi )
This is one of most authentic Hadith books by Sunni Muslims.
6.Well he is teaching in his episodes , did not to this daz that he is challanged.
No worries , he will be.
Then in other episodes he says that Jesus is the angel Gabriel.
In India, GurmeeRam Rahim Singh or Ram Lal also had massive following. Are they Mahdis? Presently, they are in jail for rape. As for teachings, what is new that they have taught? Have not the societies been following those laws even before their coming?The proof of prophethood is massive following and fundamental teachings.
Are the Mahdis? Presently, they are in jail for rape.
As for teachings, what is new that they have taught? Have not the societies been following those laws even before their coming?
I was talking about two people in India who have large following. Kindly note that where I have written "Are the Mahdis", read that as "Are they Mahdis". This was in reply tp Bharat Jhunjhunwala, who said a large following signifies that the person is a Mahdi. Does he know that in Abrahamic religons, there can only be one Mahdi?This accusation of yours is untrue
Which societies did you have in mind?
I was talking about two people in India who have large following.
I was talking about two people in India who have large following. Kindly note that where I have written "Are the Mahdis", read that as "Are they Mahdis".
This was in reply tp Bharat Jhunjhunwala, who said a large following signifies that the person is a Mahdi. Does he know that in Abrahamic religons, there can only be one Mahdi?
India, China. Even Hammurabi in Babylon (c. 1792 to c. 1750 BCE) had announced nice laws for his time, which are reflected in Abrahamic religions.
That is not correct according to Qur'an, because Allah said that he sent messengers to all people. Furthermore, did those whom you take as messengers, Imams and Mahdis, showed their appointment letter from Allah?None of the Babylonians were ever appointed by God.
That is not correct according to Qur'an, because Allah said that he sent messengers to all people.
Furthermore, did those whom you take as messengers, Imams and Mahdis, showed their appointment letter from Allah?
Does that mean that anyone who does not accepts your imams and mahdis will fall dead?The authentic narration from Al Kafi says that whoever falsely claims that Will, his age will be cut short. That is the proof by itself.
If you know the accusations against the Nabi it comes basically to two:Please feel free to explain how did you come up with that conclusion of yours
Yes, what you say is true. Almost every hadith about the Mahdi is him being one person. Imam Jaffar (a) says not to forsake what is certain for what is doubtful.Does he know that in Abrahamic religons, there can only be one Mahdi?