It's interesting that you only list religions as paths to whatever your goal is.
I got my answers outside of religion, and got most of them decades ago. I don't think of myself as searching, nor following anything except my own conscience and my understanding of how the world works. My worldview is essentially unchanged in almost 40 years. Its metaphysics is still naturalistic, the moral values come from the application of reason to conscience, and the epistemology comes from the application of reason to evidence.
Notice that none of it comes from any religion or even other people. I may get ideas reading the thoughts of others rather than inventing them myself, but it doesn't matter where the ideas come from. They have to meet the same personal criteria to be accepted.
The mental map that I used to navigate life was sufficient to lead me to a life that I am happy with, which is why I say that I am not searching for anything except more of the same.
Isn't that the real definition of wisdom - knowing what to want to attain satisfaction? Knowing what brings lasting satisfaction and what doesn't? Intelligence is the ability to get what you want, but wisdom is knowing what to want to achieve equanimity. Should you go for wealth and fame, or love and beauty? Which will make you happier? Which will leave you content and which will leave you wanting and regretful?
Incidentally, when I say I got my answers, what I mean is that I got answers to what could be answered, like how to treat people and what kind of a life I wanted to live, recognized that the rest could not be answered such as about gods and afterlives, and am satisfied with that.
I've asked you in the past to ask yourself if you really are on a path of any kind, what you hope to achieve, and what you have learned about yourself and the world. The reason is because I suspect that there is no path, goal, or learning, just the playing of a part. If not, don't you want to recognize that?
The reason I even suggest this is because in my many years interacting with people who use that language - spiritual journey, spiritual truth - none can describe it at all. None can tell me where they've come from or gone to intellectually or intuitively, and none can give me an insight that isn't trivial. If you are actually accomplishing something, you ought to know what in concrete terms. If you do, great, keep up the good work. I'd love to hear what it was. If not, wouldn't you want to recognize that?
I think of my decade or so in Christianity, where we thought we were being transformed - filled with the Holy Spirit, born again, a new man in Christ. We studied the Bible assiduously in search of divine truths. Eventually, I noticed, that I had learned nothing of value. There was no growth there. There was no journey.
Growth didn't resume until I left that mode of thinking and believing. Had I not, I might still be stagnating in the same place, looking to a holy book for answers that just weren't there for me. I see these people on TV preaching occasionally, exhorting their audiences to go deeper into their faith and religion, to know Jesus more fully, followed by a story about how Elijah or Abraham had great faith and were rewarded by the Lord, as if there were wisdom or useful instruction there. Rinse, lather, and repeat year after year, and you can see what I mean about people who see themselves as on a journey of discovery who are doing no such thing as was I for those years.
That's why I ask you to consider what you have accomplished looking for answers the way you do. If something, as I said, by all means carry on. If nothing that actually gives you useful guidance or comfort, then shouldn't you recognize that? What do you know now of value that you didn't know five years ago that you learned through what you call spiritual practices?
