Mod: "No-one on this forum takes you seriously anymore."
Me: "My proofs for Riemann Hypothesis, Goldbach's, Twin prime conjectures are 25 days now under consideration of most top math journals, surely, I am stupid."
Quest for truth: “Simon, son of Jonah, you will be called Peter - the Stone. And on this rock, I will build My Church. " (the Bible). As many as two letters of Peter are in the New Testament. And his acts are in the Book of Acts. Peter is the supreme apostle for the Jews. The Paul for the Gentiles. Hence, Peter-Stone is the cornerstone of the Church.
So, since then everything is based on some kind of stone: The founder of Scientific Atheism is the talented scientist Pierre Simon Laplace. The France name Pierre translates as Peter. That is, Simon-Peter. He told the emperor about God "I didn't need this hypothesis." He was the introducer of atheism as the basis worldview into Scientific Community. Science was atheism-free until Peter Simon Laplace was born. He founded scientific atheism. The Modern Science was founded only after 15-th century. Science in prior times was connected with pagan gods (the texts of pagan thinker Aristotle). After 15-th century and before Laplace's birth, it was Christian Science. Peter Simon Laplace was the most influential, most rich, and most talented scientist in the pre-Einstein era, please read his glorious extraordinary brilliant biography. The words and influence of ordinary atheist on Science is near zero. Thus, the voices of some strange people before Laplace's birth have not spoiled the course of Science.
The founder of the modern scientific picture of the world is the German Einstein. From German: "Stein" - Stone. The "ein" is the usual addition in German: "Einstein = Ein Stein".
Because Einstein's ideas are well supported by observations and experiments, Einstein is truly right.
Proof:
In Einstein's theory for a system of size S, holds not the Einstein equation in its textbook form, but the scientific description contains the value of S. In the limit S=0 the Einstein equations emerge. Hence, any future theory, which has as limit Einstein Equations, coincides with Einstein Theory. Hence, the ideas to generalize Einstein equations using non-locality or non-linearity
[Hehl and Mashhoon in Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 064028; Cooperstock and Tieu in astro-ph/0507619]
are not new physics at all.
The Einstein Equations must emerge in the limit S=0, because of Newton's principle: "I was standing on the shoulders of giants": the new theory must not contradict old theory in the area of its applicability. For low energies holds Newton formulas, for high energies - Einstein. There is no third option because all range of energy is well covered by these two theories.
This explains why Scientific Community continues to search for dark matter particles
and plans to do so indefinitely. My idea is the same particles, but they have no weak interaction [as well as any other "direct-contact" interaction (which are strong and electromagnetic ones)]. Or, more generally: "Dark Matter (and Dark Energy) is a substance that has no weak (or any else) interaction with an ordinary substance." That explains how angels and devils can move through closed walls of houses: angels are made of such invisible matter, which has no interactions with ordinary matter.
Unproven God is believed by theists and not believed by atheists.
Self proclaimed genius "
"My proofs for Riemann Hypothesis, Goldbach's, Twin prime conjectures are 25 days now under consideration of most top math journals," a humble way of proving God by saying that you are smarter than the rest of us, similarly is unproven, until those journals accept your genius. It is odd that one person simultaneously proves two unproven math problems that have stumped the greatest geniuses of all time.
"
Peter-Stone is the cornerstone of the Church"
https://www.phrases.org.uk/bulletin_board/35/messages/1155.html
Mae west said "is that a
pickle in your pocket, or are you glad to see me."
"everything is based on some kind of stone"
Apophenia - Wikipedia
Apophenia (/æpoʊˈfiːniə/) is the tendency to
perceive meaningful connections between unrelated things. The term (German: Apophänie) was coined by psychiatrist Klaus Conrad in his 1958 publication on the beginning stages of schizophrenia.
"founder of
Scientific Atheism is the talented scientist Pierre Simon Laplace"
Pierre-Simon Laplace - Wikipedia
Wikipedia (Laplace): "Someone had told Napoleon that the book contained
no mention of the name of God; Napoleon, who was fond of putting embarrassing questions, received it with the remark, 'M. Laplace, they tell me you have written this large book on the system of the universe, and have never even mentioned its Creator.' Laplace, who, though the most supple of politicians, was as stiff as a martyr on every point of his philosophy, drew himself up and answered bluntly,
Je n'avais pas besoin de cette hypothèse-là. (
"I had no need of that hypothesis.")"
Laplace made math calculations and didn't constantly praise God for the outcomes. Did that make Laplace an atheist? Is this a reason to battle all mathematicians and scientists? Should we go back to the good old days of torturing scientists to death (in a very pious way, of course)?
"Science was atheism-free until Laplace was born." What about all those scientists who were tortured to death by the Catholic Church? What about those scientists who were threatened to recant their scientific beliefs or face horrible torture and death? People like Galileo, for example.
Can you picture Galileo telling the king that the telescope will allow him to see distant objects clearer, then tell him to use only one eye, then have the king use the wrong eye (looking through the telescope with the closed eye). King: "Off with his head."
Limit S=0: I think that you are referring to the
Correspondence Principle. That means that the theory of Special Relativity (of Einstein) must agree with Newtonian physics when dealing with objects that travel slowly, though at high speeds, Special Relativity takes over. It also means that the rules of Quantum Mechanics must change to Newtonian mechanics when dealing with very large objects, but when dealing with very small objects the rules of Quantum Mechanics apply.
Let me rephrase (for clarity) the above statement. Special Relativity is for traveling at nearly the speed of light, but the theory must convert to Newtonian physics (that we are comfortable using because we can observe it in our daily lives) when velocity is small. Similarly, Quantum Mechanics (which governs small objects) must break down to Newtonian Mechanics when dealing with larger objects. All this is by the Correspondence Principle.
It was rather shocking to Einstein that
probability dominated the laws of motion in small distances (where Quantum Mechanics dominates). This is why Einstein said "God doesn't play dice with the universe."
Dark matter: I got the impression that dark matter is normal matter that one cannot see. So, it might consist of neutron stars that no longer glow. Or, it might consist of hydrogen gas which cannot be seen unless light shines on it which would allow the gas to absorb certain frequencies of light (absorption spectrum) or unless the gas was heated to radiate certain frequencies of light (emission spectrum). Although there might be some dark matter that we have not yet encountered.
Dark energy, that they speculate is responsible for the expansion of the universe, is said to have reverse gravity (thus accelerating the expansion of the universe).
dark energy | Definition, Discoverers, & Facts
Encyclopedia Britannica (dark energy): "
Dark energy is detected by its effect on the rate at which the universe expands and its effect on the rate at which large-scale structures such as
galaxies and
clusters of galaxies form through gravitational instabilities."
I think that you are saying that dark matter and dark energy is different, and does not interact with normal matter, but, nonetheless, affects the acceleration of the expansion of the universe.
Spooky action (quantum entanglement) is another interesting issue. We know that nothing travels faster than the speed of light in a vacuum, yet, if we change the spin of one entangled particle, the other entangled particle spin will also change, immediately, regardless of distance apart.