• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Bahaism and proofs against it.

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Salam

The Quran when argues for Mohammad (s), sometimes does from the viewpoint "say he was a forger", that still God would establish a rope from him, connect humanity through his words of light, and appoint them chosen kings.

It also argues that say Mohammad (s) was a liar, still, you should allow people freedom to decide whether he is a true Prophet or not, and not oppress people, but face the Quran which is claimed to be from God or his messages aside from that (The Sunnah) with reason.

It also because Mohammad (s) would be an oppressor to himself and towards God if he was a forger, says, this claim (that he is forger requires proof) or even more so, that his claims to proofs and the scripture ought to be given a chance regardless and they ought to be handled, rather then personally attack the Messenger as a person.

This is because the chance of someone being a Messenger from God is not something trivial. Even if we are sure x person is not appointed by God, others might believe, and so instead having emotional battle, intellectual proofs is what is required.

That said, I believe the Quran although very clear in that there is no divine scripture to be revealed to humanity (end of Nubuwa), we must be cautious and present proofs regarding Bahaism to being a false religion if we are going to assert it.

It's not good enough if we personally know, but we must present proofs.

Although there is many ways of tacking this issue, to me, a clear way is that if Quran is confirmed then a true understanding of it must be presented.

A lot of focus has in this case, been on the seal of Prophets verse, and Baha'allah interpretation of it. But I will focus on something that has a whole other arsenal in the Quran for it.

I will focus on the day of rising/judgment or the last day per Quran. There is in fact two days of God left per Quran, the Mahdi rising is one, and the end of the world and resurrection of people of the grave is another.

Days of God includes days like when Moses was sent with clear miracles, and a universal day where miracles will be open in public again, is coming. This is one of the days of God or the hour or awaited moment in the Quran. The consequences if humans oppress believers and reject the clear signs of God in form of miracles are such that not a city will remain but be destroyed before the day of judgment or punished severely.

Now another important day of God is the actual day of judgment that all humans will be risen to face. I will argue that the interpretation by the asserted Prophet of Bahais that the day of judgment pertains to him and all of the talk is metaphoric prophecies about him, doesn't stand to reason when we investigate the verses about the day of judgment.

This is my assertion that I should prove to Bahais. Although it should be clear to everyone, I understand, to Bahais, it's not necessarily clear to them, and so I will try to contextualize the day of judgment in the following ways:

1] With respect to the chapter itself
2] With respect to other verses about the day of judgment
3] With respect to the clearest display of signs of God and accountability, and why faith is not accepted on that day, and it's too late to repent and be good.
4] With a dialogue about language and obtuse nature of humans with respect to scripture in not applying rules of language to God's words

After I believe my work is done in this thread, I will bring another proof against it which is the concept of the family of the reminder and the sacred number of Twelve with respect to successors of each initializing Leader from God with respect to his family in another thread.

And finally, after those two are done, I will have a dialogue about seal of Prophets verse in another thread, which is still a proof in itself.

I believe in presenting these three proofs in three threads, starting with this one about last day, I would have done justice to Bahais as far my disbelief in their Prophet goes and done as Quran says "bring your proof if you are truthful".

With peace and blessings.
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
According to Quran, clear miracles displayed by Moses (a) for example, still were denied as sorcery and magic.

However, Quran pertaining to the day of judgment talks about it's display of God's power to the extent, no one will deny it.

Among the verses that suggest this, is the 2nd verse of the Chapter Al-Waqiah


لَيْسَ لِوَقْعَتِهَا كَاذِبَةٌ

"No one will deny it's coming to pass"

In fact, while in the past miracles were dismissed as works of a sorcerer, it will be said rhetorically on the day of judgment:

وَقِيلَ مَنْ ۜ رَاقٍ

"who is the enchanter/caster?"

اسْتَجِيبُوا لِرَبِّكُمْ مِنْ قَبْلِ أَنْ يَأْتِيَ يَوْمٌ لَا مَرَدَّ لَهُ مِنَ اللَّهِ ۚ مَا لَكُمْ مِنْ مَلْجَإٍ يَوْمَئِذٍ وَمَا لَكُمْ مِنْ نَكِيرٍ

"respond to your Lord before there comes to you a day when there is no averting from God - there is no refuge on that day and there is no way for you to be ignorant(on that day)"

While there is time to take refuge when a Messenger comes in the rope of God, this day, it's saying, it's too late and disbelievers will have no way to take refuge in God and asylum in God's rope and there is no room to even disbelieve this day as well which goes with the verse from Chapter Al-Waqiah.
 
Last edited:

InvestigateTruth

Well-Known Member
Salam

The Quran when argues for Mohammad (s), sometimes does from the viewpoint "say he was a forger", that still God would establish a rope from him, connect humanity through his words of light, and appoint them chosen kings.

It also argues that say Mohammad (s) was a liar, still, you should allow people freedom to decide whether he is a true Prophet or not, and not oppress people, but face the Quran which is claimed to be from God or his messages aside from that (The Sunnah) with reason.

It also because Mohammad (s) would be an oppressor to himself and towards God if he was a forger, says, this claim (that he is forger requires proof) or even more so, that his claims to proofs and the scripture ought to be given a chance regardless and they ought to be handled, rather then personally attack the Messenger as a person.

This is because the chance of someone being a Messenger from God is not something trivial. Even if we are sure x person is not appointed by God, others might believe, and so instead having emotional battle, intellectual proofs is what is required.

That said, I believe the Quran although very clear in that there is no divine scripture to be revealed to humanity (end of Nubuwa), we must be cautious and present proofs regarding Bahaism to being a false religion if we are going to assert it.

It's not good enough if we personally know, but we must present proofs.

Although there is many ways of tacking this issue, to me, a clear way is that if Quran is confirmed then a true understanding of it must be presented.

A lot of focus has in this case, been on the seal of Prophets verse, and Baha'allah interpretation of it. But I will focus on something that has a whole other arsenal in the Quran for it.

I will focus on the day of rising/judgment or the last day per Quran. There is in fact two days of God left per Quran, the Mahdi rising is one, and the end of the world and resurrection of people of the grave is another.

Days of God includes days like when Moses was sent with clear miracles, and a universal day where miracles will be open in public again, is coming. This is one of the days of God or the hour or awaited moment in the Quran. The consequences if humans oppress believers and reject the clear signs of God in form of miracles are such that not a city will remain but be destroyed before the day of judgment or punished severely.

Now another important day of God is the actual day of judgment that all humans will be risen to face. I will argue that the interpretation by the asserted Prophet of Bahais that the day of judgment pertains to him and all of the talk is metaphoric prophecies about him, doesn't stand to reason when we investigate the verses about the day of judgment.

This is my assertion that I should prove to Bahais. Although it should be clear to everyone, I understand, to Bahais, it's not necessarily clear to them, and so I will try to contextualize the day of judgment in the following ways:

1] With respect to the chapter itself
2] With respect to other verses about the day of judgment
3] With respect to the clearest display of signs of God and accountability, and why faith is not accepted on that day, and it's too late to repent and be good.
4] With a dialogue about language and obtuse nature of humans with respect to scripture in not applying rules of language to God's words

After I believe my work is done in this thread, I will bring another proof against it which is the concept of the family of the reminder and the sacred number of Twelve with respect to successors of each initializing Leader from God with respect to his family in another thread.

And finally, after those two are done, I will have a dialogue about seal of Prophets verse in another thread, which is still a proof in itself.

I believe in presenting these three proofs in three threads, starting with this one about last day, I would have done justice to Bahais as far my disbelief in their Prophet goes and done as Quran says "bring your proof if you are truthful".

With peace and blessings.
Hello,

It all boils down to how the Quran is understood.

But, I only post a few things here so, it is clear how Bahais understand Day of Resurrection or Judgement Day.

There is actually a work done on this by some Bahais and I will post a part of it, as a response to your point of view

Here are a couple of verses that tells us, after the resurrection Day comes, people are still unaware:


"Warn them of the day of sighing, when the decree shall be accomplished, while they are sunk In heedlessness, and while they believe not." (Quran, Maryam-19:39)

"But on the day of Resurrection some of you shall deny the others, and some of you shall curse the others." (Quran, Ankabut-29:25)

Let us now ask ourselves this question: If the overwhelming description of the changes in the physical world to take place on the Day of Judgment is to be interpreted literally, would it be reasonable to expect that the unbelievers would still be "unaware" of it, would not know its occurrence, and particularly. after the "decree would be accomplished" for them to be still sunk in "heedlessness" and not to believe, and above all for men to "deny" and "curse" one another? Wouldn't the physical signs and portents be so drastic that there could be no room for unbelief, heedlessness and cursing to continue?

Some Notes on Bahá'í Proofs Based on the Qur'an





Another verse I wanted to point out is, 7:53


"Are [the unbelievers] but waiting for the final meaning of that [Day of Judgment] to unfold? [But] on the Day when its final meaning is unfolded, those who aforetime had been oblivious thereof will say: "Our Sustainer's apostles have indeed told us the truth! Have we, then, any intercessors who could intercede in our behalf? Or could we be brought back [to life] so that we might act otherwise than we were wont to act?" Indeed, they will have squandered their own selves, and all their false imagery will have forsaken them"



If you look at the Arabic word in this verse which is translated as "Final Meaning", or "Final Fulfillment", you will see, it is "Taweel".

In the Quran, there are many examples when the word Taweel is used. For example in the Chapter of Joseph.
This word always indicate, a symbolic fulfilment! So, when the verse 7:53, says, the Taweel of Day of Resurrection comes, this can only mean, the prophecies of Day of Ressurection have a symbolic interpretation. Similar to how Taweel in Chapter of Joseph, means Symbolic Fulfillment of prophecies. What does 11 stars, moon and sun prostration to Joseph mean?
 

Dawnofhope

Non-Proselytizing Baha'i
Staff member
Premium Member
All the best with disproving the Bahá’u’lláh is a Prophet. As I understand it, Islamic eschatology is largely based on Hadiths and materials beyond the Quran. So at the outset, what the day of judgement looks like along with the resurrection is difficult to discern from the Quran alone.
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Here are a couple of verses that tells us, after the resurrection Day comes, people are still unaware:


"Warn them of the day of sighing, when the decree shall be accomplished, while they are sunk In heedlessness, and while they believe not." (Quran, Maryam-19:39)



Let us now ask ourselves this question: If the overwhelming description of the changes in the physical world to take place on the Day of Judgment is to be interpreted literally, would it be reasonable to expect that the unbelievers would still be "unaware" of it, would not know its occurrence, and particularly. after the "decree would be accomplished" for them to be still sunk in "heedlessness" and not to believe, and above all for men to "deny" and "curse" one another? Wouldn't the physical signs and portents be so drastic that there could be no room for unbelief, heedlessness and cursing to continue?

Salam

The verse 19:39 why can't while mean warn them while they are sunk in heedlessness and while they believe not? That it's telling Mohammad (s) to warn them about this day while they are heedless and don't believe. I'm curious because we had this conversation before and I brought the same point to that verse.

As for cursing, it's because the arrogant misguided the weak, and the weak will curse those they followed, and there are many verses about this, which is actually a further proof of the day of judgment. I will be posting these verses, to show a dialogue weak will have with the arrogant who lead them astray, and that has yet to take place.
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
All the best with disproving the Bahá’u’lláh is a Prophet. As I understand it, Islamic eschatology is largely based on Hadiths and materials beyond the Quran. So at the outset, what the day of judgement looks like along with the resurrection is difficult to discern from the Quran alone.

Salam

Hadiths compliment the Quran, but at the same time according to hadiths, everything is in Quran, and so it's about how hadiths and Quran go together. There are many hadiths about day of judgment though you are right, and they don't align with Bahai views either.
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
In the Quran, there are many examples when the word Taweel is used. For example in the Chapter of Joseph.
This word always indicate, a symbolic fulfilment! So, when the verse 7:53, says, the Taweel of Day of Resurrection comes, this can only mean, the prophecies of Day of Ressurection have a symbolic interpretation. Similar to how Taweel in Chapter of Joseph, means Symbolic Fulfillment of prophecies. What does 11 stars, moon and sun prostration to Joseph mean?

Words in Arabic have multiple meaning. However, I'm trying to understand, either way, how does this support the Bahai case?
 

InvestigateTruth

Well-Known Member
Salam

The verse 19:39 why can't while mean warn them while they are sunk in heedlessness and while they believe not? That it's telling Mohammad (s) to warn them about this day while they are heedless and don't believe. I'm curious because we had this conversation before and I brought the same point to that verse.
Seems to me, the verse is talking about, when it already happened, they are unaware. It is the tense of the verse.
The verse does not say, you don't believe it will happen. It says, when it will happen, you are unaware.


As for cursing, it's because the arrogant misguided the weak, and the weak will curse those they followed, and there are many verses about this, which is actually a further proof of the day of judgment. I will be posting these verses, to show a dialogue weak will have with the arrogant who lead them astray, and that has yet to take place.
I had looked at Ahadith. "Some of you cursing each other" is an allusion to the Muslim sects. This prophecies are related to after Mahdi. After Mahdi comes the Muslim sects will show hatred toward each other. In Baha'i view, so did it happen. You see how Shia and Sunni and various sects have been in war and hatred. This prophecies were explained by Shia as and Muhammad.
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
The verse does not say, you don't believe it will happen. It says, when it will happen, you are unaware.

Assertion without evidence, so again, why can't the "wa hum" (while) tense refer to the Messenger warning them about the day of judgment while they are in this state?

There is no reason to read it in a way that contradicts all the verses about the day of judgment being a day where there is no room for denial, it's the more rational way to read it, and the way Muslims read it.

The while tense can refer warn them while they are in this heedless state. There is no reason to assume it doesn't mean this either, and the many verses about the day of judgment confirms this as the true interpretation.
 

InvestigateTruth

Well-Known Member
Words in Arabic have multiple meaning. However, I'm trying to understand, either way, how does this support the Bahai case?
Yes, but, we need to see, how Quran uses a word. That is how the Quran defines the meaning of the word.

The question is, according to Quran, will the Day of Judgment and resurrection happen literally and exactly physically, or, these descriptions are symbols with an inner meaning.


As I mentioned, according to Quran, when God or Prophets, prophesy about future events, they describe then with symbols.
For example, when Joseph had a dream of the stars, moon and sun prostrate to Joseph, these stars are symbols of Brothers, the sun is symbol of father.

Likewise, remember a dream a man had in Surrah of Joseph. Seven fat cows followed seven skinny cows.

Thus when the prophecy was fulfilled, O cows ever appeared literally. But, instead 7 years of prosperity and seven years of poverty appeared.


Quran, calls this symbolic fulfilment "Taweel".

Likewise, the Prophecies of Day of Resurrection are to be fulfilled according to their Taweel. That is, for example, when it says, Dead shall Rise to a new life, no such a thing would literally appear. But, as the Imams have said, it means the sinners and unbelievers who are like dead, will be revived by Mahdi. That is they will be guided by Mahdi, and that is Resurrection.

As regards to Taweel when we look at many other verses in Quran, such as darkness of Sun and Moon, earthquakes, etc,... all of these have hidden symbolic meaning. This is why, in Bahai view, no overwhelming signs happen literally. This is why, in Bahai view, it happened, but most people are unaware.
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Okay, I understand your viewpoint. I will try to also contextualize the verses about dead and resurrecting dead, as I believe it's impossible if you contextualize them with the dialogue he was having with disbelievers about it, to be non-literal.

Language allows room for metaphors for sure, but if you mix everything up, then God can't state literal things, which doesn't make sense either.

We have to put everything in it's proper place.
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
There are these verses about dead and resurrection, which gives some contextualization, and I will be posting more:

وَإِنْ تَعْجَبْ فَعَجَبٌ قَوْلُهُمْ أَإِذَا كُنَّا تُرَابًا أَإِنَّا لَفِي خَلْقٍ جَدِيدٍ ۗ أُولَٰئِكَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا بِرَبِّهِمْ ۖ وَأُولَٰئِكَ الْأَغْلَالُ فِي أَعْنَاقِهِمْ ۖ وَأُولَٰئِكَ أَصْحَابُ النَّارِ ۖ هُمْ فِيهَا خَالِدُونَ
And if you would wonder, then wondrous is their saying: What! when we are dust, shall we then certainly be in a new creation? These are they who disbelieve in their Lord, and these have chains on their necks, and they are the inmates of the fire; in it they shall abide.


أَيَعِدُكُمْ أَنَّكُمْ إِذَا مِتُّمْ وَكُنْتُمْ تُرَابًا وَعِظَامًا أَنَّكُمْ مُخْرَجُونَ

Does he promise you that when you have died and become bones and dust you will indeed be brought forth?



إِنْ هِيَ إِلَّا مَوْتَتُنَا الْأُولَىٰ وَمَا نَحْنُ بِمُنْشَرِينَ
فَأْتُوا بِآبَائِنَا إِنْ كُنْتُمْ صَادِقِينَ

‘It will be only our first death, and we shall not be resurrected.
So bring our fathers (back), if you are truthful.
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
There is not a town/city but We will destroy it before the Day of Resurrection, or punish it with a severe punishment. That has been written in the Book.


Before it is said, destruction means metaphorical spiritual yada yada, I will suggest people to read all the verses about destroyed cities in Quran and the warnings about. This is a conditional Prophecy, that cities/towns that disbelieve will be destroyed and not one on earth will be left if they disbelieve, but will be destroyed.

The verse after talks about signs in form of miracles that are a trial for people and so this pertains to the Mahdi who brings signs and miracles, and whatever city rejects him, will be destroyed and God doesn't destroy cities or generations without first sending them a Messenger with clear proofs in forms of miracles. And this happens before the day of rising/resurrection.

And so the two are not same.
 

InvestigateTruth

Well-Known Member
There is not a town/city but We will destroy it before the Day of Resurrection, or punish it with a severe punishment. That has been written in the Book.


Before it is said, destruction means metaphorical spiritual yada yada, I will suggest people to read all the verses about destroyed cities in Quran and the warnings about. This is a conditional Prophecy, that cities/towns that disbelieve will be destroyed and not one on earth will be left if they disbelieve, but will be destroyed.

The verse after talks about signs in form of miracles that are a trial for people and so this pertains to the Mahdi who brings signs and miracles, and whatever city rejects him, will be destroyed and God doesn't destroy cities or generations without first sending them a Messenger with clear proofs in forms of miracles. And this happens before the day of rising/resurrection.

And so the two are not same.

This is my view on this:

So, we have to know what is the Taweel of "destruction of cities".

Do we know its Taweel?

verse 3:7 says no one know its Taweel except God and Those who are well-grounded in knowledge. These are Imams and Messengers.
 

InvestigateTruth

Well-Known Member
There are these verses about dead and resurrection, which gives some contextualization, and I will be posting more:

وَإِنْ تَعْجَبْ فَعَجَبٌ قَوْلُهُمْ أَإِذَا كُنَّا تُرَابًا أَإِنَّا لَفِي خَلْقٍ جَدِيدٍ ۗ أُولَٰئِكَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا بِرَبِّهِمْ ۖ وَأُولَٰئِكَ الْأَغْلَالُ فِي أَعْنَاقِهِمْ ۖ وَأُولَٰئِكَ أَصْحَابُ النَّارِ ۖ هُمْ فِيهَا خَالِدُونَ
And if you would wonder, then wondrous is their saying: What! when we are dust, shall we then certainly be in a new creation? These are they who disbelieve in their Lord, and these have chains on their necks, and they are the inmates of the fire; in it they shall abide.


أَيَعِدُكُمْ أَنَّكُمْ إِذَا مِتُّمْ وَكُنْتُمْ تُرَابًا وَعِظَامًا أَنَّكُمْ مُخْرَجُونَ

Does he promise you that when you have died and become bones and dust you will indeed be brought forth?



إِنْ هِيَ إِلَّا مَوْتَتُنَا الْأُولَىٰ وَمَا نَحْنُ بِمُنْشَرِينَ
فَأْتُوا بِآبَائِنَا إِنْ كُنْتُمْ صَادِقِينَ

‘It will be only our first death, and we shall not be resurrected.
So bring our fathers (back), if you are truthful.
In Bahai view they are all Metaphorical.
The Day of Resurrection is also described as a new creation. It is creation of a new human civilization, both spiritually and literally. So, after the 19th century, when the Bab and Baha'u'llah appeared, we see, it is totally new human era.
Quran and Hadithes mention a first creation and a later creation. The first creation in six days, is 6000 years, each day is a thousand year. It started from Adam, and Ended with manifestation of the Bab, who in Baha'i view is the Qaim of family of Muhammad. Then after that, the new creation started.
The first creation, is like creation of a building. The first brick was Adam, and the Last brick was Muhammad.
The new creation, started with the Bab, and continues for long long time. Once in a while God sends a new messenger as part of this new creation.
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
This is my view on this:

So, we have to know what is the Taweel of "destruction of cities".

Do we know its Taweel?

verse 3:7 says no one know its Taweel except God and Those who are well-grounded in knowledge. These are Imams and Messengers.

3:7 says for the whole Quran no one knows it's interpretation except God and those firmly grounded in knowledge, it didn't say, that none of the Quran is understood by anyone else.

Therefore you cannot assert 3:7 to say we don't know what is meant by destruction of cities.

The other thing is that Quran talked about destroyed cities of the past through out and there is nothing ambiguous about it. I will be quoting verses about this, since, it contextualizes the verse.
 

InvestigateTruth

Well-Known Member
3:7 says for the whole Quran no one knows it's interpretation except God and those firmly grounded in knowledge, it didn't say, that none of the Quran is understood by anyone else.

Therefore you cannot assert 3:7 to say we don't know what is meant by destruction of cities.

The other thing is that Quran talked about destroyed cities of the past through out and there is nothing ambiguous about it. I will be quoting verses about this, since, it contextualizes the verse.
I explained this before.
In my view, the key is verse 7:53. This verse is talking about a time, when the prophecies of Day of Resurrection will be fulfilled. Only after it is fulfilled it can be known how it was. The key in this verse, is the Word Taweel, which is the same word in 3:7.
So, according to Quran, whatever in Quran requiring Taweel is not known by ordinary people.
The verses regarding Day of Resurrection need Taweel. They are not like clear or Muhkamaat verses. We know this, from verse 7:53.
So, destruction, needs Taweel. Only God and His messengers and Imams know what it means by destruction.
Is it spiritual or physically destroying people's homes?

How do we know?


The hint is, the Quran say, just before Day of Resurrection all will die. All will be expired in earth and heaven.
This in Bahai view is spiritual and metaphorical.

In Hadithes, it is said The Mahdi, comes in a time, when people are in depth of ignorance.
This is the same spiritually death, or destruction. Then Mahdi comes to resurrect the world. Albeit, He will be rejected, so, then there will be a period of punishment, including wars between Muslim sects.
 
Last edited:

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I explained this before.
In my view, the key is verse 7:53. This verse is talking about a time, when the prophecies of Day of Resurrection will be fulfilled. Only after it is fulfilled it can be known how it was. The key in this verse, is the Word Taweel, which is the same word in 3:7.
So, according to Quran, whatever in Quran requiring Taweel is not known by ordinary people.
The verses regarding Day of Resurrection need Taweel. They are not like clear or Muhkamaat verses. We know this, from verse 7:53.
So, destruction, needs Taweel. Only God and His messengers and Imams know what it means by destruction.
Is it spiritual or physically destroying people's homes?

How do we know?


The hint is, the Quran say, just before Day of Resurrection all will die. All will be expired in earth and heaven.
This in Bahai view is spiritual and metaphorical.

In Hadithes, it is said The Mahdi, comes in a time, when people are in depth of ignorance.
This is the same spiritually death, or destruction. Then Mahdi comes to resurrect the world. Albeit, He will be rejected, so, then there will be a period of punishment, including wars between Muslim sects.

Taweel means interpretation, the Quran and 3:7 advocates to follow what is clear and to remove ambiguities by holding to clear insights and signs. That which is unclear is from Satan, because Quran is a clear book of insights and bright signs, so if you follow unclear from it, Satan will misguide you in confusion as it is a book of insights and clear signs, you shouldn't be following anything unclear from it. The hadiths say the same thing, they say to follow what is clear, and never follow what is unclear, but rather always remove it's darkness and unclearness through it's clear signs.

7:53 has nothing to do with what you are saying and you are bringing a very odd interpretation and far fetch way of seeing it.

As for destruction, my argument, is that Quran talked about destroyed cities, there are TONS of verses about destroyed cities of the past. This gives context to what is meant by the future prophecy, and so we see this occurs before the day of judgment.

I'm not saying you can't play games with the words, yes you can, just as Sunnis don't accept Ali (a) and Ahlulbayt (a) by playing games with God's words as well as that of the Prophet's (s), you are welcome to the same.

But the meaning is clear, this is a prophecy of the Mahdi which is going to occur before the day of judgment as the verse clearly manifests. There is nothing ambiguous about destruction of cities, because the so many verses of the Quran has explained what is meant by that by contextualizing the destroyed cities and generations of the past.
 
Top