Sorry, No. That's not true at all.
A lot that has been said in the Bible has been reproduced, continue to be reproduced, and is reproducible.
also, just because an explosion is reproducible, that does not mean that an explosion was responsible for... say, as an example, the universe.
The moon being where it is located, and the size it is, etc., is not proven to be so, because one can reproduce a deflection from a collision that one sets up with all the circumstances one wants to exist.
In other words, making assumptions does not prove anything scientifically.
Anyone can do that. "Let's see... This looks like that, and that looks like this, so that must have come from this."
"Yeah. You are right. See how that has two of these, and that has one. It's because the two became one."
Then the community agrees. All in favor say aye.
The oddballs get eyeballed... and treated... special.
Then you call it science. It's not.
I guess we have a lot of fools, but nobody will admit they are.
Then we have the discoveries that time and again confirm the Genesis account, but what happens... They get shoved into the other corner, where the community says with a smile, "That's ours.
". Or they are just ignored.
God’s Laws on Hygiene Were Ahead of Their Time
Does Science Agree With the Bible?
The cry of allegory just is one huge failure, when one knows what the Bible contains.