If someone came to you and told you that God exists and you should follow
some instructions in order to be safe in the afterlife, and if it happened that you
asked him for a proof for God's existence and he showed you one such as
healing a blind man and letting him to see.
Will you believe that God exists if you know that the miracle was real or you'll still disbelieve?
Now, I say this as a theist, but the two don't follow. Making someone see does not compare with proving we will be safe in the afterlife, especially when God brags that we should fear Him because unlike others, He can kill souls. His inability to avoid bragging reveals He can off you at any time and His promise of eternal safety is a lie.
We're told not to go after people who try to change the law and tell us to worship others gods, miracle or no.
Yeah. I don't see FearGod suddenly worshiping Ra or whatever because the Egyptian priests also did miracles.
miracles, are no proof on their own, just a display of power.
Even Jesus chides others for focusing on miracles instead of just living.
The creator of the universe.
Older texts reveal it can't be El or Yahweh because They stem from the universe sorta. El is like Cronus, having been born when Earth mated with the Sky. Yahweh is either Son or Son in Law of El, meaning He, too, was born.
Will you believe in God if all are loving and all are good?
God in the bible says He hates. Does that invalidate His claim, then?
My reply was "Why I have to believe if I know it was fake"
How I should say it in English as to be more clear?
"Why would I believe it if I knew it was fake?"
If God can't be seen but he showed you his power, you still won't believe, right
How to differentiate an unseen force from gravity or the wind?
Do you see the electromagnetic waves?
Never played with magnets and iron filings?
Besides, other animals can see them. What is magic to you is simply nature to them.
No, it is not enough to show this miracle. But, if I investigate about this person, and found that he is a righteous and upright person, has wisdom above regular human, and has great teachings for betterment, and is also willing to sacrifice his own life for humanity, then I believe him. But if someone just shows miracles, and is not righteous and does not have good teachings, then I don't believe him.
Tricks are tricks, though. It doesn't matter who's doing it.
blind man? Nope, that is boring. but having an amputee growing a new arm might impress me.
The only thing I'd be interested in is how it was done, since I know other creatures can regenerate. It would just seem to me like someone did some genetic tinkering.
Is classifying humans vs. not classifying them, just a different face of the same god?
I guess hypocrisy isn't excluded from god concepts.
Yahweh's like a politician: tells you what you want to hear to be elected and then does whatever He wants after the inauguration.
Then explain what was before the big bang?
Likely a dying universe. History can be cyclical.
My assumption that he's healed by no method
There has to be a method, otherwise it wouldn't be done.
Let's say I witness a true miracle and Yahweh claims credit. The next day I witness another true miracle and Vishnu claims credit. Should I not accept Them both?
That's the material world. God isn't.
That's what religious leaders told people when asked to define God.