It seems you are presuming that God exists, as one of your premises, to argue that I am wrong. That will not do. You can't just presume that my conclusion is incorrect as part of your argument. You need to show that either my premises are incorrect or that my conclusion doesn't follow from them.
If God does not exist, there is no argument, so we have to presume God exists for the sake of discussion.
You can't just presume that my conclusion is incorrect as part of your argument. You need to show that either my premises are incorrect or that my conclusion doesn't follow from them.
Would you feel like a puppet if someone prevented you from doing evil? If someone prevented you from killing someone else, would you be a mere puppet? I don't see why.
If another person prevented me from killing someone else I would consider it a favor, just like if another person prevented me from driving drunk, he would be doing me a favor.
But God is not a person.
If God prevented everyone who was about to do evil from doing evil that would upset the entire order of creation.
How would that be just and fair to all the other people who have to struggle and choose to do good by virtue of their own free will?
God is not responsible for the free will choices people make and if God took responsibility for our choices that would not be doing us any favors because in that case would never learn anything from the mistakes that we make. The whole purpose of life is to develop our character and learn what we need to learn in preparation for the next life. Taking our choices away is not doing us any favors.
If people do evil deeds they will have to pay for them in this life or in the next life. If good people are affected by their evil deeds, the good people will be recompensed by the courts in this life or by God in the next life.