Science itself knows that "life comes from pre-existing life".....that is an inescapable fact of nature....its what they see demonstrated time after time in any of their experiments.
The only time it is denied is with reference to abiogenesis. All of a sudden, their provable fact becomes unprovable....but it doesn't alter their stance. They sit there with their fingers in their ears whistling Dixie..
They exchange what they see as our fairy story, for one of their own...even more unbelievable and fanciful than ours.
I disagree. For a Christian this is a different ballgame.
What is the "best scientific evidence" based on when it comes to macro-evolution? When you examine the first premise...that all the rest of their theory is built on, you find nothing concrete.....its all matchsticks. There is no solid evidence to build on in the first place. They hide behind their reinvented word "theory".....as if it doesn't really mean what the dictionary says it means. They don't need to prove a "scientific theory", but that doesn't stop them from presenting it as established fact. The fact is...there are NO FACTS involved in their musings about what happened all those billions of years ago. Its all based on guesses...and a biased interpretation of their "evidence".
We who identify as Christians are told in the Bible that a super intelligent, evil agency is working hard behind the scenes to play on our propensity to "believe" whoever has the better argument and to follow what appears to be "solid evidence" to get us to abandon our faith. But its not until you really examine the facts that you realize that science has built a very impressive edifice on nothing but assumption and conjecture. For a Christian that is 'exchanging the truth for a lie, rendering homage to creation itself, rather than to the one who created it'. (Romans 1:25)
There is a lot at stake here.