It's a pretty weak religion that requires an adherent to actually touch, here in the age of electronic communication.The point is that you've been unilaterally declaring that meeting in person is necessary for Christians but statements from other Christians show that isn't as definitive as you'd like to make out.
My mother-in-law is very unhappy about not being able to go to church. She's accustomed to at least three services a week. But she understands the health risks for everyone, and puts up with "Facebook sermons" and talking to her friends on the phone. She's part of a little support group.
They check on each other daily and chat and get other people(like me) to help out with stuff. Simple stuff mostly. Picking up prescriptions and groceries. Trying to find isopropyl alcohol(TP isn't a problem anymore). Getting a trash toter out to the street on collecting day.
The way I see it, responding to other people's needs, especially the frail and "at risk", is far more Christian than getting together to talk about the Bible telling you to do that.
Tom