exchemist
Veteran Member
The Church of Christ of Latter Day Quantum Woomeisters?
(Affiliated with Deepak Chopra's Mission to the Nitwits.)
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Universe Code
- Thread starter Samantha Rinne
- Start date
(Affiliated with Deepak Chopra's Mission to the Nitwits.)
ecco
Veteran Member
No. You don't want to learn anything that may dispute your religious beliefs. If you did you would have begun that process on your own. That's what people do when they want to learn something. They get books or attend classes.
You, like many theists, make silly assertions like: "All equations reject self-creation or evolution". You cannot back them up because they are nothing more than your nonsensical male bovine feces.
ecco
Veteran Member
I had to carefully look at who posted that. It looked so real.
exchemist
Veteran Member
Truth is sometimes stranger than fiction, eh?
j1i
Smiling is charity without giving money
Dear brother
One of the reasons to enter here is to participate in order to spread ideas and gain ideas
I'm really interested in knowing the way others and i enjoy read others' responses
Such theories, such as what have scientific claims as well, in return there in the situation of confrontation scientific claims against it
Without the inclination to believe religiously contrary to them
The skeptic is dealing with others, such as dealing with a teenager who is in the front of the confrontation with parents always in disregard of advice because they are difficult to convince the teenager the result of recklessness and recklessness of adolescents
We talked about the existence of a God from the first source and Adam and with the passage of time people began to change in the change in worship to God and take another source thinking that it is God
The most whole world speaks of the existence of God but the difference in the reality of who is it
There is no way to convince but pray for you
Is it possible to come to me scientific proof that you are the son of your father and your mother
We are very sophisticated in carrying out DNA forging. It is not easy to rely on forensic evidence for DNA
Is it possible to bring me scientific evidence that you are the son of your father and mother?
You are shaking hands with the right hand without scientific evidence
Why don't you shake hands with others without touching
Do you believe in something without evidence?
Do you stupidly believe that hand shaking is a more reliable way without proof?
You will respond with all coolness justifications that lack my dialogue and show that I did nothing
Your friend puts likes to encourage you and show you the appearance of excellence
Note that this work is noble
I want you to think about why you shake hands with the right and how you will bring me proof that you are the son of your father and mother, without the DNA that I can change and your duty to accept me as a member of your family
i'm your brother by dna
and you have no evidence that i'm not from your family
should accept me
I will seize the millions that I will inherit in the future
If you are not rich, I will look for another family that I pretend to be part of by fraud
See how you are looking for evidence tools that are not always the most powerful source and may be trick or false
Etritonakin
Well-Known Member
Huh?
Yes I do -and I'm definitely not doing that. I also don't know the first thing about Trump -or politics. According to biblical guidelines, we are to obey human law and authority -be good citizens, etc. We are not to work against -or toward the overhtrow of -human authority. Actually, Christ was killed for "sedition" -but the accusation was false. He will rule later -but he did not challenge Roman authority. "The kingdoms of this world" will become "the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever." -but by none of our doing.
Last edited:
Etritonakin
Well-Known Member
Nope! It's just that it is going to be awesome! Not only will all the evils of this present time be worth what is ahead, but they will eventually be nullified and no longer called to mind. THAT IS AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Anyway -you can't help believe what you presently believe until you can't help but believe otherwise.
ecco
Veteran Member
Dear brother
One of the reasons to enter here is to participate in order to spread ideas and gain ideas
I'm really interested in knowing the way others and i enjoy read others' responses
Such theories, such as what have scientific claims as well, in return there in the situation of confrontation scientific claims against it
Without the inclination to believe religiously contrary to them
The skeptic is dealing with others, such as dealing with a teenager who is in the front of the confrontation with parents always in disregard of advice because they are difficult to convince the teenager the result of recklessness and recklessness of adolescents
We talked about the existence of a God from the first source and Adam and with the passage of time people began to change in the change in worship to God and take another source thinking that it is God
The most whole world speaks of the existence of God but the difference in the reality of who is it
There is no way to convince but pray for you
Is it possible to come to me scientific proof that you are the son of your father and your mother
We are very sophisticated in carrying out DNA forging. It is not easy to rely on forensic evidence for DNA
Is it possible to bring me scientific evidence that you are the son of your father and mother?
You are shaking hands with the right hand without scientific evidence
Why don't you shake hands with others without touching
Do you believe in something without evidence?
Do you stupidly believe that hand shaking is a more reliable way without proof?
You will respond with all coolness justifications that lack my dialogue and show that I did nothing
Your friend puts likes to encourage you and show you the appearance of excellence
Note that this work is noble
I want you to think about why you shake hands with the right and how you will bring me proof that you are the son of your father and mother, without the DNA that I can change and your duty to accept me as a member of your family
i'm your brother by dna
and you have no evidence that i'm not from your family
should accept me
I will seize the millions that I will inherit in the future
If you are not rich, I will look for another family that I pretend to be part of by fraud
See how you are looking for evidence tools that are not always the most powerful source and may be trick or false
Another page of Muslim preaching. It won't go far here. It will go less far when addressed to me.
You, like many theists, make silly assertions like: "All equations reject self-creation or evolution". You cannot back them up because they are nothing more than your nonsensical male bovine feces.
If you can't back up that assertion, I seriously doubt that you can post anything of value.
ecco
Veteran Member
You live in this Country and you "don't know the first thing about Trump -or politics". That's disgraceful.
I guess you are one of those people who just sit back and say "It's all God's will".
Etritonakin
Well-Known Member
So the first thing you accused me of being was not disgraceful? Are you anti-Trump while accusing the Trump-ignorant of sedition?
You are all over the shop -jumping from one assumption about me to another.
How much do you think your personal will affects politics or the presidency? You may choose from available options based on what little information you might be able to get or be given -but I choose to create a better situation by making good decisions (ask what I can do for America) -doing things correctly -not hoping someone I can't possibly know extremely well will make them for me. I definitely hope they make good decisions -because position and opportunity are important -and I understand the concept of voting for someone you think will make better decisions than another -but I literally had better things to do -and literally had no time for something that would not be a good use of my time even if I did have time -due to the fact that getting the facts is quite difficult these days -and one vote may or may not have as much power as one might think. Besides, the temps aren't always the ones actually making the big decisions, anyway.
ecco
Veteran Member
What assumptions? You said...
To which I responded...
Etritonakin
Well-Known Member
guess will suffice
ecco
Veteran Member
Typical. You make nonsense comments and when called out you duck and dodge.
Well, beauty's only skin deep.
BSM1
What? Me worry?
DOH!
Etritonakin
Well-Known Member
If you can't understand that guess and assume are about the same thing -don't think that I want to send any signals out to your admittedly-deaf ears.
Also mostly ignoring you so as to not detract from the OP
P.S.
64
SBT
Last edited:
ecco
Veteran Member
emphasis mine...
When you state: "I also don't know the first thing about Trump -or politics",
I don't have to guess.
When you state: "I also don't know the first thing about Trump -or politics",
I don't have to assume.
You do understand how the English language works, don't you?
When you state: "I also don't know the first thing about Trump -or politics",
I don't have to guess.
When you state: "I also don't know the first thing about Trump -or politics",
I don't have to assume.
You do understand how the English language works, don't you?
Etritonakin
Well-Known Member
Chill, dude.
ecco
Veteran Member
You want me to chill? You essentially call me a liar, then duck and dodge when I call you out and the best you can do is say "Chill, dude".
ecco previously:
When you state: "I also don't know the first thing about Trump -or politics",
I don't have to guess.
When you state: "I also don't know the first thing about Trump -or politics",
I don't have to assume.
I don't have to guess.
When you state: "I also don't know the first thing about Trump -or politics",
I don't have to assume.
Are you now conceding that I wasn't "assuming" or "guessing" when I quoted you saying that you "don't know the first thing about Trump -or politics"?
Maybe you should grow some ethical balls and man up to your mistakes.
Yerda
Veteran Member
Not just Deepak Chopra. You'd be surprised at how many bonkers (on the face of it) ideas were espoused by serious scientists. Heisenberg, Schroedinger, von Neumann, Russell (ok he was a philosopher but a really important one), and Eddington to name a few, proposed ideas that many modern atheists dismiss out of hand as woo. I'm pretty confident that those guys were much smarter and far more engaged with the science that say Dawkins or Sam Harris (not that I dislike either of those two).