I know I am - I am right that you cannot support your thesis that Darwin gave us Hitler.
The appendix works on automatic pilot and is the sole organ in the body that is not part of a larger organ system. It is proven impossible that any part of the human nervous or autonomous system touches the appendix, runs through it, or catalyzes its actions... you're correct!
What is 'autonomous system'? As a language expert, why on earth do you pretend that you have special insights into things like anatomy and physiology?
This is hilarious to me because you cannot understand the depths of your ignorance on that one thing (and pretty much all of your evolution/biology claims). And you just won;t admit your demonstrated errors. At least Shmogie did... once.
What needs catalyzing in the appendix? Do you even know what catalysis is?
And you're right again! Hitler wasn't a Darwinist, because he didn't believe in survival of the fittest or that non-white races and Jews were inferior creatures, and he never, ever, ever used Darwinist/evolution terms like "race" or "struggle among races", etc. in his many hundreds of speeches that were written or recorded.
I think you REALLY understand Adolf Hitler and ought to write a book!
Wow... I didn't realize that the term "race" was invented by Darwin - read that in Weikart, did you? And Hitler believed that differential reproduction (i.e., survival of the fittest) justified his Jew hatred, and NOT the writings of his Christian influences like Luther? Huh....
And Hitler used Darwin's "struggle among races" such as races of cabbages, horses, and pigeons - the ONLY races he referred to in his book?
Wow, that Weikart is worse of a scholar than I thought!
Let us all recall, that in his zeal to PROVE that Hitler was influenced by Darwin, BB actually linked to an article that concluded thusly:
One of
YOUR linked articles:
"In order to sustain the thesis that Hitler was a Darwinian one would have to ignore all the explicit statements of Hitler rejecting any theory like Darwin’s and draw fanciful implications from vague words, errant phrases, and ambiguous sentences,neglecting altogether more straight -forward, contextual interpretations of such utterances. Only the ideologically blinded would still try to sustain the thesis in the face of the contrary, manifest evidence."
Poor BB - you try so hard.... and fail...