I deny it. Ha Ha Ha. I am imort...aaaaaaghhh. Plop.Death comes to all.
The 1 truth nobody can deny.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I deny it. Ha Ha Ha. I am imort...aaaaaaghhh. Plop.Death comes to all.
The 1 truth nobody can deny.
The Normandy invasion was a single battle though.We have had some operations that went according to plan. At least overall. Historically, the Normandy invasion may be the best example of that, but yeah, history doesn't offer many examples of wars that were by the book and followed predicted outcomes to the letter.
I think there are other barriers to any presidential aspirations I may harbor, but I will ad pragmatist (or is it realist) to the list.
I deny it. Ha Ha Ha. I am imort...aaaaaaghhh. Plop.
That is what I mean. The best we have are single examples of operations within wars.The Normandy invasion was a single battle though.
I speak of an entire war. Who predicted that WW2
would've proceeded as it did?
At least we won it.
Wars since have gone poorly.
Death comes to all.
The 1 truth nobody can deny.
The problem with wars is that there are so many battles.That is what I mean. The best we have are single examples of operations within wars.
And glad that we did win it too.
They do seem kind of confused about goals, outcomes and exits.
Eternulax The Immortal, dead at the age of 26.The immorts are usually the first to go.
I am not sure I follow you on that last statement.The problem with wars is that there are so many battles.
Decisions to start one shouldn't be based upon imagining
how few & successful they'd be.
It'll all be over by Christmas! They'll welcome as liberators! [/tribal neocon]I cannot find any reason to be optimistic about a war with Iran. Look how much our wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have cost and that was against enemies that were either undermanned with inexperienced soldiers, having limited advanced weapons or subsisting on primitive technologies.
Hawks often tell me about how Iran will be defeated in a singleI am not sure I follow you on that last statement.
My personal position is that we should always be prepared to fight a war, but it is best to win them by avoiding them.
There are people in this country that probably assumed that the Afghani and Iraqi people would celebrate the victory in their traditional Christmas attire too.It'll all be over by Christmas! They'll welcome as liberators! [/tribal neocon]
I was thinking about how the nature of our defense has changed over time. Now it is fought much like video games. But the need for men on the ground is going to be a constant in any confrontation, even now.Hawks often tell me about how Iran will be defeated in a single
battle...a campaign of bombs & missiles with no grunts carrying guns.
They assume that the enemy has no effective air defense & no
countermeasures.
It's important to learn from history.I used to think that way myself. At least about some enemies of the US. But we keep getting into battles with people that are supposed to be easy targets and it just goes on and on and on until we lose the will to continue.
I was thinking about how the nature of our defense has changed over time. Now it is fought much like video games. But the need for men on the ground is going to be a constant in any confrontation, even now.
I used to think that way myself. At least about some enemies of the US. But we keep getting into battles with people that are supposed to be easy targets and it just goes on and on and on until we lose the will to continue.
If only we would. Of course a history of positive wins can lead to bad decisions when applying that to current situations.It's important to learn from history.
It has been pointed out that protracted confrontations do equal increased sales.That is good news for arms manufacturers.
Which is good for the, err their, economy.
It's important to learn from history.
I see that it's totally critical to always use the exactly accurate word to describe someone.Still, an unsourced claim is a tenuous basis for going all "He's insane!".
One might call it meta-insanity.
We happen to agree on this point.Hawks often tell me about how Iran will be defeated in a single
battle...a campaign of bombs & missiles with no grunts carrying guns.
They assume that the enemy has no effective air defense & no
countermeasures.
Examples of politicians learning from history?True dat.
Please provide examples of that happening in recent US history.
(I’m not trying to be mean, I just couldn’t help it. Anyway, can you say something to lift me out of this terminal depression ? I’m counting on you Rev. Make it something reassuring)