I am not surprised - and unfortunately stuff like that builds in to the narrative that
@Vinayaka and
@CG Didymus have been stating that there is a sense of insecurity that causes Baha'i's to try and build up their religion more than it really is - in my opinion a kinder gentler attempt at at the Shia Shakya of Islam but still with a sentence in the Kitab-i-Aqdas where it is said it is okay to burn someone for committing arson.
I can tell you - that a lot of the Universal thoughts and ideas espoused are also espoused in Sikhism - which was formalized a mere 150 years prior to 1844 - but where there were 10 prophets that appeared over a 300 year period.
For me -
and me only - when I search for the raison d'être of the Baha'i faith - I really do not find any - and pathetic attempts by the likes of
@InvestigateTruth to equate the teachings / persona of the prophet or the religion with the established ones only adds to my belief about the inherent insecurity of some of the followers and its desperate attempt to show that
"Yes we matter - our religion matters" - see my running debate with
@Trailblazer who has been at a loss to explain her why her beliefs make intuitive sense to anyone not a Baha'i - other posters than myself have managed to catch her contradicting herself or admitting she does not know the answers - be that as it may
You will not find anyone from the dharmic faiths pushing their agenda so vigorously as some of the Baha'i's on here seem to do. Yes we debate and put forth counter points and ask questions - but never try and equate our prophets and beliefs with those of anyone else.