socharlie
Active Member
well, they do not accept abortions, contraceptive, gay lifestyle, LGBT, did not care about GW, e.t.c.recently
we wiped out as some estimated 7 million Arabs, just culled them for many fake reasons.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
well, they do not accept abortions, contraceptive, gay lifestyle, LGBT, did not care about GW, e.t.c.recently
we wiped out as some estimated 7 million Arabs, just culled them for many fake reasons.
recently
we wiped out as some estimated 7 million Arabs, just culled them for many fake reasons.
What does that have to do with what I posted?talking about depopulation :
No Children Because of Climate Change? Some People Are Considering It
Not at all. I am very disturbed and sad that it happens. Education and improving living conditions - should be the way.Are you suggesting that killing off innocent people is the best solution for the overpopulation problem?
Do you think that makes it morally acceptable?well, they do not accept abortions, contraceptive, gay lifestyle, LGBT, did not care about GW, e.t.c.
a lot, GW is invented to redistribute wealth and spook people into not having children, it works, in sum it works - population trending down.What does that have to do with what I posted?
People deciding that the right thing to do, under the circumstances, is not to have kids has nothing to do with your vague conspiracy theory. The one about "they" "created" low sperm count in Western peoples.
Breeding is simply not the same as it was a thousand years ago, morally. Things are dramatically different today. Breeding, when you can't provide the essentials of a solid upbringing, isn't a moral choice. It's immoral. I don't really care what you think that God thinks about that.
Tom
murder is not acceptable.Do you think that makes it morally acceptable?
Tom
I did my research of population issue, I am not ignorant of what is going on. As I said, I have no issue with humane depopulation methods , abortions and bombing civilians and outright deceptions is not what I advocate.What does that have to do with what I posted?
People deciding that the right thing to do, under the circumstances, is not to have kids has nothing to do with your vague conspiracy theory. The one about "they" "created" low sperm count in Western peoples.
Breeding is simply not the same as it was a thousand years ago, morally. Things are dramatically different today. Breeding, when you can't provide the essentials of a solid upbringing, isn't a moral choice. It's immoral. I don't really care what you think that God thinks about that.
Tom
No it isn't.a lot, GW is invented to redistribute wealth and spook people into not having children, it works, in sum it works - population trending down.
Then what point was the to your post? The one I quoted?murder is not acceptable.
You don't even know the basics. Population growth has slowed down but it's still growing. And there's no particular reason to think it will stop any time soon.I did my research of population issue, I am not ignorant of what is going on.
World - Birth rate - Historical Data Graphs per YearNo it isn't.
That's simply wrong, and the stats are available to find for yourself. Population is still growing.
Tom
yes, it may take 50-100 years. In some countries it is happening , e.g. Japan, 10 + countries in Europe.You don't even know the basics. Population growth has slowed down but it's still growing. And there's no particular reason to think it will stop any time soon.
Tom
My sisters are very smart... one says there is plenty of land for farming and another says China's population is going into a downward spiral. Africa is spreading population.
I have also heard a very smart man saying its the number one problem.
What do you think? I particularly want to know what evidence you have for your side. Thank you for participating.
Birth rates are not population growth rates.
birth rates are down death rates are down too but far from to be equal to birth rate drop, population grows rate is going down and will turn negative as I Japan. India - Population growth rate - Historical Data Graphs per YearHuman overpopulation is one facet of the broader issue of human impacts on this planet. It's better to think of it using the I=PAT equation, which was developed by environmental ethicists in the 70s. In simple terms, human impact "I" on the biosphere is the multiplicative product of "P" (human population), "A" (affluence, or consumption per unit of population), and "T" (technology, or resource-intensiveness of consumption). Accounting for all three components is required to successfully lower human impacts. All of these factors are well-established drivers of environmental issues, and I'd suggest cruising to your local public library to check out some works on it if you're truly interested.
It's worth remembering that part of the point of these equations is to remember that the planet is not just about humans. Human growth has come at the expense of the rest of the world; we basically operate like an invasive species. Human impacts on this planet have caused mass-scale ecocide and a sixth mass extinction event (see Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction - for a good summary paper on this that was published recently), which is abominable regardless of the ramifications this has for humans. Anyway, I digress.
A few resources on human overpopulation specifically (really, there is a ton of stuff out there - visit your local public library):
- As usual, Wikipedia - Human overpopulation - Wikipedia - does a decent job of a summary article of the entire issue.
- Life on the Brink - Environmentalists Confront Overpopulation (I haven't actually read this book, but since it has schmoggle previews, it's something accessible right now)
- Human Population Growth and Extinction (has the most depressing graph ever, plus other pages beyond this one that explore the issue)
- Ecological Society of America Forum (perspectives of various scientists on the issue of human population and the issues it poses; available in total as a PDF)
There is approximately .75 square miles of living area per person taking just the farmland available and not taking into account that people live on mountains, high rises than allow multiple families living in just one building, desserts etc, etc. etc. if my calculations are correct.My sisters are very smart... one says there is plenty of land for farming and another says China's population is going into a downward spiral. Africa is spreading population.
I have also heard a very smart man saying its the number one problem.
What do you think? I particularly want to know what evidence you have for your side. Thank you for participating.