I read a very interesting article on the issues of junk science.
Does the Crisis in Science Show That It Is Broken, or Self-Correcting?
What's interesting, all of the issues that contemporary science face is consistent with what theology is all about. I have a rather unfavorable view of theology which is university based and question its validity at every turn. Is what we see on religious forums generally just junk parading as reasoning? This question Cuts both ways in context to religion and science. It's an interesting aspect of our thinking processes that puts the two in conflict and mutual agreement at the same time. Like a conflicted individual with with what appears to be two divergent realities, yet symbiotic. Any thoughts on junk religion?
Does the Crisis in Science Show That It Is Broken, or Self-Correcting?
What's interesting, all of the issues that contemporary science face is consistent with what theology is all about. I have a rather unfavorable view of theology which is university based and question its validity at every turn. Is what we see on religious forums generally just junk parading as reasoning? This question Cuts both ways in context to religion and science. It's an interesting aspect of our thinking processes that puts the two in conflict and mutual agreement at the same time. Like a conflicted individual with with what appears to be two divergent realities, yet symbiotic. Any thoughts on junk religion?