Wirey
Fartist
That's her last sober day, I'll bet.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Obama would make talking about guns a CRIME.
- Thread starter jeager106
- Start date
That's her last sober day, I'll bet.
What are we....some effete neutered Brits?
No!
We have guns in this country & the right to own them.
Anyone who doesn't like it can take a testosterone antidote & move to some Europistanian welfare state.
Altfish
Veteran Member
See, you have a temper and you have guns, not a good combination.
dust1n
Zindīq
I really don't have any problems with gun ownership, other than how dull and boring the hobby is, but you'd have to be pretty damn gullible to actually thinking anyone's guns are in danger of being taken. These stories exist solely for the purpose of selling more guns. That's about it.
I have a sense of humor.
(You might be a wee bit new to spot it.
The "Brit" comment was for @oldbadger ....one of those emasculated Limeys.)
Last edited:
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
The only thing Info Wars is good for is ignoring.
No, fringe sites are often the ones to break real news which mainstream media will ignore.
But discovering it there warrants searching for better sources.
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
I can assure you, Info Wars is just bad.
Prepper paranoia, 9/11 was an insider job, fluoride treated water killing us, as a source they are very paranoid and way too much into conspiracy theories. And this is hardly the only time they have, falsely, claimed the government is coming for our guns.
I get more of them than I'd like to because the head shop/tattoo parlor I go to has their magazines and bumper stickers everywhere. I've read enough to know I don't want to read anymore. I'd rather listen to people insist there are FEMA death camps, because Grissom AFB is supposed to have one were the prison is, and because I live just a few miles from Grissom I can have some fun with that debate.
Every now & then, the paranoid are correct.
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Well, that is true. I'd still rather check the batteries rather than relying on knowing a broken clock will ultimately be correct twice a day.
Broken clocks are right more often though.
But ya know I've actually had clocks which were unreliable,
so I'd look at'm for the time, but if it seemed wrong, I'd check another.
Those clocks are the TruthRevolt of the timekeeping world!
Last edited:
Since we're a much more violent country (except for sports fans at stadiums),
we need guns for self defense.
Defensive gun use - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
How much worse would murder, assault & robbery rates be if those folk had no guns to defend themselves?
This is an issue never addressed by the gun grabbers, who have a rather pollyanna view of their agenda,
ie, unintended consequences are the fly in their ointment.
Ah. You must be kidding with that comparison.
One other thing that bothers me is that the thread title is quite disconnected from what is actually said even in the article.
No, they were carefully chosen.
You might not be aware of how those particular presidents were thought of here.
Btw, among psychotherapists I've talked politics with, Reagan is the most hated of all time.
And Dubya was the most generally derided....yes, even more so than.....
I remember a protest where pregnant women bore signs saying "Nixon's the one!".
Ah, those were the days.
Ah, those were the days.
You must be kidding, then.
What would ya even know of it, Brazil Boy!
You spend all yer time eat'n tapas while watch'n soccer in girlie's makeup!
Altfish
Veteran Member
Is it really more violent? And which comes first the violence or the guns? If the person attacking you doesn't have a gun you don't need a gun to defend yourself. It is all the collateral damage too, that 3-year old kid is just one example. It appears to us in the UK that being black is a legitimate reason to shoot someone in the US.
Take the guns out of the equation would the country be so violent?
So, are you saying that if we legalised guns in the UK and people carried them to defend themselves our death rate from guns would drop further???
I accept there will always be guns, there are guns in the UK, but it is very rare that they are used and it is headline news every time it happens.
Even licensing of gun holders would be a start.