Yes, maybe so ?.
so it is not true that each culture thinks theirs is the best culture.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yes, maybe so ?.
I think my native language (Swedish) is boring, plain and sounds silly. But I dont think thats a reason for killing it.Sicilian sounds ugly. It's not like French, which sounds beautiful.
yes...actually I classify Romance languages according to qualitative point of view.
French is the best, then there is Spanish, Portuguese and Italian.
Sicilian sounds ugly. It's not like French, which sounds beautiful.
yes...actually I classify Romance languages according to qualitative point of view.
French is the best, then there is Spanish, Portuguese and Italian.
But that's subjective. Sicilian could sound wonderful to someone else. Do you want everything you dislike eliminated? Only things you like allowed to exist?
I have found that wildly fascinating since I started learning Japanese. America, a highly individualistic society, has just I and me to refer to ourselves. Japan, a highly collectivist society, has several ways to refer to yourself. When compared to other cultures, it seems America has not actually embraced individuality but rather threw it out the window. It seems individuality hardly applies outside of union busting and "self-accountability" outside of the free market.No, it just has half a dozen ways of saying "I". ^_^ And I LOVE it for that. :yes:
In Italian we have lots of Z (pronounced like in pizza) ...so it can be qualified as a boors' language, compared to the refined French.
By the way...I discovered this, and I am realizing that Americans are more interested than us in preserving Sicilian
Arba Sicula - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
so it is not true that each culture thinks theirs is the best culture.
I have found that wildly fascinating since I started learning Japanese. America, a highly individualistic society, has just I and me to refer to ourselves. Japan, a highly collectivist society, has several ways to refer to yourself. When compared to other cultures, it seems America has not actually embraced individuality but rather threw it out the window. It seems individuality hardly applies outside of union busting and "self-accountability" outside of the free market.
well...the term pizza is Italian so you Americans pronounce it exactly as Italians do. And the ts sound is exactly what I was talking about. It is really an uncool sound...and we have it in many wordsI don't know how pizza is pronounced in Italian, but in English it's with a "ts" sound. So, phonetically, it's "pee-tsa". The "ts" sound is frequently used in Japanese, which I find very lovely to hear.
tell me about it! Speaking French is not relaxing at all. You have to keep your lips closer than usual, and you have to produce lots of nasal sounds. Italians are comfortable and feel relaxed when they talk Spanish.In any case, I have heard Italian before, and French. They sound equally beautiful to me. Besides, French is only "refined" more by reputation than actuality.
One reason I'm not as interested in learning it is because you have to speak it through your nose.
well...the term pizza is Italian so you Americans pronounce it exactly as Italians do. And the ts sound is exactly what I was talking about. It is really an uncool sound...and we have it in many words
tell me about it! Speaking French is not relaxing at all. You have to keep your mouth closer than usual, and you have to produce lots of nasal sounds. Italians are comfortable and feel relaxed when they talk Spanish.
I bet you Americans find Spanish and Italian almost identical. Actually it is true. From a phonetic point of view, they are incredibly similar.
I don't see how having only one way to refer to yourself is a strong indication of being an individual, because you simply cannot be anything without having others as a reference point. Without realizing "I" is being shaped and influenced of other cultures, how can "I" hope to shape itself unless it recognizes it needs others to define itself, and without others it can't even exist.Only one way to refer to oneself indicates an apparent value of an individual, entirely apart from any context. "I" am just valuable. Japan, being more socially-minded, has many. To me, this says that they place no value on an individual except in the context of others. This makes SO much more sense to me. "I" have no value except in the context of my environment and social circle. Since we're a social species, that's perfect in my mind. Plus, which form of "I" being used is capable of communicating a lot about the person.
Take, for instance, this phrase: ore wa onna! ("I am female") Those who speak Japanese are probably giggling.
I don't see how having only one way to refer to yourself is a strong indication of being an individual, because you simply cannot be anything without having others as a reference point. Without realizing "I" is being shaped and influenced of other cultures, how can "I" hope to shape itself unless it recognizes it needs others to define itself, and without others it can't even exist.
I don't know how pizza is pronounced in Italian, but in English it's with a "ts" sound. So, phonetically, it's "pee-tsa". The "ts" sound is frequently used in Japanese, which I find very lovely to hear.
In any case, I have heard Italian before, and French. They sound equally beautiful to me. Besides, French is only "refined" more by reputation than actuality. One reason I'm not as interested in learning it is because you have to speak it through your nose.
Makes sense that we would be highly interested in linguistic preservation considering our.... history.
The individual being is what I was originally referring to. The lone Cowboy is the American archetype, but we are also very unaware of social influence make make us a part of a group and allow us to distinguish ourselves from the group. We say we are individualist, but all "I" can ever be is nothing more than I with a list of adjectives. For all our "individuality," we don't even have a feminine or masculine way of I. Our rugged Cowboy has no "boku" to state his masculinity when declaring himself to a another.I wasn't talking about the state of individual-being, but of value.
It's based more on the fascinating contrast between US and Japanese culture: the US pan-culture greatly values the lone, nameless Cowboy archetype, while the Japanese place much greater emphasis on the Team.
Superman vs. Super Sentai, if you will. (For those unaware, Super Sentai is better known in the English-speaking world by its US counterpart, Power Rangers).
It's more that I observed this contrast, and then noticed it manifest in the differences in how we refer to ourselves.
False. French is not spoken through the nose, but through puckered lips.
The individual being is what I was originally referring to. The lone Cowboy is the American archetype, but we are also very unaware of social influence make make us a part of a group and allow us to distinguish ourselves from the group. We say we are individualist, but all "I" can ever be is nothing more than I with a list of adjectives. For all our "individuality," we don't even have a feminine or masculine way of I. Our rugged Cowboy has no "boku" to state his masculinity when declaring himself to a another.
so it is not true that each culture thinks theirs is the best culture.
As I said maybe so, and maybe not, I can't say it doesn't happen, because being human It certainly would.
In any case, I have heard Italian before, and French. They sound equally beautiful to me. Besides, French is only "refined" more by reputation than actuality. One reason I'm not as interested in learning it is because you have to speak it through your nose.
Makes sense that we would be highly interested in linguistic preservation considering our.... history.