Uh-uh. Not strong enough. It's the disbelief in the existence of a deity. As in, "I don't believe in God, because there is no God".
It can be an active disbelief.
However, it is not believing in a deity, either actively {god does not exist} or inactively {merely lacking a belief in a deity}
Wrong. It is specifically the disbelief in a deity. As in, "I don't believe in God, because there is no God". It explains, in part, why so many atheists are egotistical.
You can whine about your favoured version of the definition all you want.
It merely shows that not only are you ignorant of the definition of atheism, but that you are
intentionally ignorant of the definition of atheism.
Wrong, again. It is specifically the disbelief in a deity. As in, "I don't believe in God, because there is no God". It explains, in part, why so many atheists are egotistical.
Repeating the same ignorant statement does not help your credibility.
The mix up is on your end. It usually is.
Now, tell me how you know that God does not exist, and why are you fighting the idea of a God in the first place? Do you not understand that the upside is infinitely better than anything you currently have any hope to live for?
I am not the least bit interested in your strawman of ignorance.
You have been informed of the truth of the matter.
Your wishing to remain intentionally ignorant reveals much more about you than it shows of anything else.
Now that you have been informed, it is my opinion that every time you repeat the ignorant statement, you are flat out lying.