not nom
Well-Known Member
And your first clue was?
all you're doing is bragging about beating strawmen. yawn. popcorn? to each their own.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
And your first clue was?
These thread is already more annoying than stepping into The Lord of Flies.
:clap:yes::clap
That sums it up nicely.You can tell how honest that was because I didn't even care enough to fix "This." But the OP has no inherent problems itself. Just the comments that follow.
all you're doing is bragging about beating strawmen. yawn. popcorn? to each their own.
We could all resort to making off topic personal comments too........
OK here you go.how about actually discussing the merit of those talking points? instead of already anticipating "drama", accepting nothing else, responding to anything serious with non-sequiturs?
how about actually discussing the merit of those talking points?
Business as usual is to demonise your opponent. [..] Members like mball can make conservatives look stupid and convince you that his way is the only logical option. People who subscribe to his mantra are not going to change their minds so debate about this while fun is rarely constructive.
I suppose you believe that when a Democrat says they are with the OWS crowd they are being sincere?you write that bile without blinking, without being aware of the irony? whoa.
I just laugh anymore when I hear people claim that the USA is still the 'Land of the free'.
No surprises here. Florida is a hot Republican meeting ground, and Republicans are constantly looking for a way to follow the same policies, with often means updating their lingo to an even more dishonest and laughable approach. Why do they even bother trying to argue OWS. No one in OWS is going to vote Republican.
I laugh when I hear people claim that the Democrats are ''the other side'' when compared to Republicans.
Thirty years ago we had Democrats who where in the KKK holding congressional seats.It might have been true 30 years ago.
Thirty years ago we had Democrats who where in the KKK holding congressional seats.
The south did not vote Republican back then.
I suppose you believe that when a Democrat says they are with the OWS crowd they are being sincere?
Your right about that my friend and it matter little who we elect. Both sides are getting screwed and we are being laughed at while we fight each other providing the perfect diversion from what is really going on.Today's Republicans and Democrats are both corporate bought and paid for.
Your right about that my friend and it matter little who we elect. Both sides are getting screwed and we are being laughed at while we fight each other providing the perfect diversion from what is really going on.
uhm, no? are you saying one can't criticize something republicans do, because the democrats do it as well, and vice versa?! after you told me about "gridlock", no less. I don't buy into that whole "either one of two camps" BS anyway, so what do democrats have to do with me? it's enough america is ******, don't try to infect me with it kthx.
but what does that have to do with you talking about demonetization, while engaging in it, anyway?
If you go back and read my posts you will see I readily admitted to hypocrisy on both sides.
No shame in my game.
You can believe all that Liberal Democratic crap you like, because all they are doing is serving you lip service.
Obama said he would close Gitmo and end the Iraq war. He was going to get us out of Afghanistan and improve the economy for the little guy with clean green jobs.
His stimulus bill was going to have unemployment at 8%.
YES WE CAN!
It's all lies that the Democrats are for the little guy.
Just remember, I said the Republicans are no better, but we are the bad guys when we do the same crap your side is famous for.
Let me ask you one little question, do you believe Obama will do any better if you give him four more years?
Can you afford to be wrong about that?