• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Prop 8 in California

lilithu

The Devil's Advocate
Proposition 8 should be taken off the ballots immediately and its results should be nullified. Just look at the proposition. It is designed to take rights away from an identifiable group of people.
Which is why some good lawyers are preparing to file a law suit as we speak. This ain't over.
 

lilithu

The Devil's Advocate
Right now, it looks like the margin for Prop 8 is 400,000 votes. Round that up to a half million just to be safe. Those were expensive votes. It took a lot of money to get them.
Yes, extremely expensive. Not just the money to hire people to collect signatures to get it on the ballot. But also the flood of advertising that down-right lied. Californians were bombarded with commercials that told them that unless prop 8 passed their churches would be forced to marry same-sex couples. Even people who are neutral on BGLT rights voted Yes on 8 because they thought freedom of religion was under attack.

It should be *-ing ILLEGAL to outright lie in political ads. There should be repercussions, prosecutions, lawsuits...
 

Draka

Wonder Woman
Maybe some people feel the same way about distorting, what they perceive to be God's Law/Natural Law. It might make sicken them also. You can love whomever you want to love, but Sodomy is unatural...

If some people feel that way due to their religion then that's on them. They shouldn't try to enforce their own religious ideals on the population in general...especially when the ones inflicting their beliefs won't have their lives affected at all.

When will these douchewaffles see that someone else's marriage DOESN'T AFFECT THEM? Whether a same sex couple gets married or not it has NOTHING TO DO WITH THEM! So why why why do they feel the sickening PERVERSE need to stick their noses in where it doesn't belong? Why do they want to openly discriminate against an entire group of people and keep them from having the same rights as them? They are no better than those throughout our sad history that fought against equal rights for blacks and women and inter-racial marriages. Egotistical cretons who think themselves so much better than others. Might as well be skinheads. :mad:
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
A victory for Californians to overturn their own Supreme Court. Judges do not have the final say on societal issues and I hope that they take notice of this, even on the left coast:yes:

Judges are hired, trained, and paid to rule on societal issues. What makes you think they are not?
 

Alceste

Vagabond
Yes, extremely expensive. Not just the money to hire people to collect signatures to get it on the ballot. But also the flood of advertising that down-right lied. Californians were bombarded with commercials that told them that unless prop 8 passed their churches would be forced to marry same-sex couples. Even people who are neutral on BGLT rights voted Yes on 8 because they thought freedom of religion was under attack.

It should be *-ing ILLEGAL to outright lie in political ads. There should be repercussions, prosecutions, lawsuits...

Thank heavens for that. The federal constitution trumps state constitutions. So it's money well wasted by the religious right, IMO. Let's hope they pay double in their next doomed effort. Maybe eventually they will bankrupt themselves.
 

Alceste

Vagabond
Thank goodness prop 8 passed,

This is a great victory i have seen today.

Hate to burst your bubble, but as I said above, the US constitution trumps state constitutions. This will be fought and defeated. People don't part with equal rights easily once they've had a sample.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Hate to burst your bubble, but as I said above, the US constitution trumps state constitutions. This will be fought and defeated. People don't part with equal rights easily once they've had a sample.
Dopp has me worried, though. I think he has a point about it not being a good idea to bring this matter before the US Supreme Court. I don't really like the idea of the Supreme Court as it is now messing with the definition of marriage at the state level; it could do more harm than good.
 

madhatter85

Transhumanist
Hate to burst your bubble, but as I said above, the US constitution trumps state constitutions. This will be fought and defeated. People don't part with equal rights easily once they've had a sample.

It's not about equal rights because same-sex marriage is behavioral.

It will not be trumped and defeated because that would be unconstitutional to overturn the voice of the people. Then you take away EVERYONE'S freedom. it become a dictatorship rather than a democracy.
 

MoonWater

Warrior Bard
Premium Member
Well at least prop 4 failed. And we know that obama is against prop 8 so maybe that will have some influence in the future of this fight. It's not over yet.

Maybe instead wasting time venting and ranting we can trade ideas on how we can all get more involved and help right this travesty. Anyone got any ideas?
 

Storm

ThrUU the Looking Glass
It's not about equal rights because same-sex marriage is behavioral.
1) Prove it
2) So what if it is? It's still about equal rights.

It will not be trumped and defeated because that would be unconstitutional to overturn the voice of the people. Then you take away EVERYONE'S freedom. it become a dictatorship rather than a democracy.
Funny how we've survived giving equal rights to women, blacks, and interracial couples.
 

MoonWater

Warrior Bard
Premium Member
It's not about equal rights because same-sex marriage is behavioral.

It will not be trumped and defeated because that would be unconstitutional to overturn the voice of the people. Then you take away EVERYONE'S freedom. it become a dictatorship rather than a democracy.

"The voice of the people"? How can it be "the voice of the people" when only 37% of "the people" vote? We don't have the voice of the people we have 37% of the voice of the people; only 4% more than the last time this was on the table And it's the supreme courts job to throw out laws they find unconstitutional. To hire someone to do a job and then get mad at them when they do do that job is completley contradictory. Besides I'll bet you wouldn't be complaining like this if things were switched, and after years of same sex marriages being allowed a few supreme court judges deemed it unconstitutional for them to marry. I bet you would be backing them up the whole way as they nullified all previous same sex marriages. I don't have any problem with you disagreeing with the ruling of the supreme court but don't make this into an issue about "abuse of power" and "the voice of the people" because that's just plain wrong. Regardless of whether or not you agree with the supreme courts ruling THEY WERE DOING THEIR JOB. And hopefully they'll do it again by getting rid of this abomination of an amendment.
 

Draka

Wonder Woman
It's not about equal rights because same-sex marriage is behavioral.

It will not be trumped and defeated because that would be unconstitutional to overturn the voice of the people. Then you take away EVERYONE'S freedom. it become a dictatorship rather than a democracy.


It is about equal rights. That's so evident you have to be blind not to see it. Oh, that's right, I forgot...religious blinders are specifically for these kinds of things aren't they?

And it's not unconstitutional to deliberately discriminate and withhold the rights of a particular group of people on the basis of prejudices?
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
It's not about equal rights because same-sex marriage is behavioral.

Uh? OF COURSE it is about equal rights. Why on earth should homosexuals have any less rights to marry than anyone else?

It will not be trumped and defeated because that would be unconstitutional to overturn the voice of the people. Then you take away EVERYONE'S freedom. it become a dictatorship rather than a democracy.

There is simply no way for the official recognition of same-sex marriages to endanger the freedom of anyone. The only thing that Proposition 8 protects is the world view of people who really ought to open their eyes (and heads) a bit already. Marriage is a private matter which the government shouldn't even attempt to discourage.
 

MoonWater

Warrior Bard
Premium Member
What was Prop 4?

It would require women under the age of 18 to inform their parents or some other family adult before being able to get an abortion and as such they would not be able to get an abortion unless their parents or some other adult relative knew about it. I don't know if said adult would have to give permission, only that they would have to be informed. Here's a link with more info.

California Proposition 4 (2008 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)
 
Top