Gullibility is not a good symptom.How exactly is the myth of alien abductions hurting anyone?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Gullibility is not a good symptom.How exactly is the myth of alien abductions hurting anyone?
Gullibility is not a good symptom.
That's a gross misreading of the text, particularly when I've explictly said the opposite more than once.
Well, you can keep denying it, but your comments here speak for themselves. If you think it's a misreading on my part (and, apparently I'm not the only one), then maybe you should specify more clearly. I have not seen anyone go from "We exist, and there are trillions of other planets out there" to "An alien abducted me and there is a huge conspiracy". All I've seen is going from "We exist and there are trillions of other planets out there" to "Intelligent life of some sort probably exists". I have never in my life heard the people who claim to have been abducted say that their reasoning was that alien life seems highly likely. They make that claim for the same reason people say they saw God. They believe they had an experience, and it's not necessarily based on reason or scientific evidence.
They believe they had an experience, and it's not necessarily based on reason or scientific evidence.
What hypocritical nonsense. Which one of those books have you read? The one by the violinist? The one by the conspiracy theorist? Or, perhaps, the one that rejects the so-called "Extraterrestrial Hypothesis"?
Gullibility is not a good symptom.
Don't bite the hand that feeds you.
... equate Sagan and Shklovskii with Timothy Good and Jim Mars...
Then it should be abundantly clear to you that I am not referring to anyone here with my comments, and they are strictly focused on the OP.
But you have seen Cardero equate Sagan and Shklovskii with Timothy Good and Jim Mars, and your support was indeed touching ...
Perhaps suggesting that Sagan and Marrs are equally valid and valuable sources of information ...What has he said that is contradicted by the idea of being well-informed ...
It seems only fair to divulge that Adamsky was a friend of my mother. I've had ample exposure to the ufology fringe. :yes:
I guess you missed the point. Maybe I didn't say it well. I'll try again. I have never heard anyone (including the man in the article in the OP) go directly from "We exist and there are trillions of other planets" to "I was abducted, or had contact with aliens". Yet, you still say that people are doing that. They are not. They are saying that they had an experience with aliens. You can say that's sick, but that's a little harsh, just like it would be for me to say you're sick for believing in God.
Greys are intelligent, humanoid extraterrestrials that appear in claims of encounters with UFO-related phenomena, especially alien abduction.
Jayhawker Soule writes: What hypocritical nonsense. Which one of those books have you read?
I've read hundreds of books on the UFO phenomenon. I have read one written by a black man, an artist, an air force Major, a scientist, a debunker, a Christian, a journalist, a contactee, an abductee, a housewife, an engineer and a novelist. I am not sure what credentials you are seeking but if you are waiting for the official announcement to be released by NASA, NSA, CIA, FBI, Air Force or our science community and government, I doubt any of us will be reading this publication or examining this data in our lifetimes. These institutions claim to have washed their hands of the phenomenon despite its ongoing presence.Jayhawker Soule writes: The one by the violinist? The one by the conspiracy theorist? Or, perhaps, the one that rejects the so-called "Extraterrestrial Hypothesis"?
Wow. And out of 100s you picked those 3. That speaks volumes about the genre. But, be that as it may, what testable evidence have you unearthed?I've read hundreds books on the UFO phenomenon.
Now I really do feel old ...I did not criticize you for the fact that it was outdated by 50 years.
I thought those particular publications were relevant to this topic and would be a fine beginning for anyone interested in further research.Wow. And out of 100s you picked those 3.
I am an armchair researcher (much like you). The reason we research these books of interest is because we do not have the same resources or opportunities as the authors to actively participate in the examination and the collection of information. Regardless, the collection of data is a form of evidence and the UFO phenomenon is never in short supply. It is up to the reader if they are interested in following through with other author’s findings but before that can happen, one has to be interested enough to want to be initially informed and to be honest Jay, I'm not feeling the interest from you.Jayhawker Soule writes: That speaks volumes about the genre. But, be that as it may, what testable evidence have you unearthed?
If it makes you feel any better, the information was new to me and a fine recommendation for something I was always interested in.Now I really do feel old ...
Angels and demons are merely descriptors for malevolence and benevolence. Some researchers may agree that the ancient historical accounts indicate that angels, demons and aliens are the same phenomenon.Tomspug writes: Perhaps you are not aware that many theists do in fact believe that angels and demons have an impact on the world in the same way that aliens do.
Angels and demons are merely descriptors for malevolence and benevolence. Some researchers may agree that the ancient historical accounts indicate that angels, demons and aliens are the same phenomenon.