• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Zionists to continue invasion by building new settlements in Palestine

Shermana

Shermana

Heretic
Assad91 said:
Hey the Native Americans used to live here centuries ago. Maybe they should have the right to force us out of our homes, and forcefully steal our now owned land.
Click to expand...

They actually accepted peace treaties when they were beaten and agreed to assimilate. Interestingly, many Native American leaders side with Israel.

Besides, every time a person says the Palestinians are justified in throwing rocks and firebombs and sniper shooting Israeli civilians in the West Bank, with their logic that it's "Palestinian land" against "The occupier", it's basically similar to condoning Natives scalping random civilians as they please.
 
Sha'irullah

Sha'irullah

رسول الآلهة
Assad91 said:
Hey the Native Americans used to live here centuries ago. Maybe they should have the right to force us out of our homes, and forcefully steal our now owned land.
Click to expand...

But we forced Native Americans out of their land. Arabs tried forcing Jews out of their own land. Filistinians are not the Natives which is why it is different :facepalm:
 
Shermana

Shermana

Heretic
Assad91 said:
UN gave Israel a specific border. Why Israel steals more land, forcefully, who knows. Lets just say God supposedly gave them that land, so stealing land that is not technically owned by them is just okay. Right.
Click to expand...

Taking land in a defensive war is not "stealing".

Care to explain why the Arabs live in land that sprawls from Morocco and Mauritania to Iraq?

That had nothing to do with "stealing", right?
 
Sha'irullah

Sha'irullah

رسول الآلهة
Shermana said:
Taking land in a defensive war is not "stealing".

Care to explain why the Arabs live in land that sprawls from Morocco and Mauritania to Iraq?

That had nothing to do with "stealing", right?
Click to expand...

Well you have to remember this was done in the name of Islam so it is different. Even if native Berbers complain about their country being Arabicized their cries will go unanswered since Arab Muslims are superior in culture. ;)
 
Assad91

Assad91

Shi'ah Ali
Sterling Archer said:
But we forced Native Americans out of their land. Arabs tried forcing Jews out of their own land. Filistinians are not the Natives which is why it is different :facepalm:
Click to expand...
Yiddish speaking Jews are not native to Jerusalem. Not like the Arab who lived there for centuries.
 
Sha'irullah

Sha'irullah

رسول الآلهة
Assad91 said:
Yiddish speaking Jews are not native to Jerusalem. Not like the Arab who lived there for centuries.
Click to expand...

And? They are still Jewish! Does not change anything. I know they are Israeli imports but their ancestry is the same.
Filistinians are a whole other story. They create war and chaos and do not even belong. When you assimilate to a country you live by their laws and norms.
Killing, genocide, terrorism, and racism is not apart of Israel and each day both Jews and Filistinians stoop to lower levels. Main result is the Filistinians. Wanting half of a land they have no claim to while also claiming all of the important "holy" parts belong to them. All of in which matches their religion and extremist views. Far too many coincidences.
 
Levite

Levite

Higher and Higher
Jerusalem is not occupied territory. It's the capital of Israel. I am quite critical of the rewarding of unauthorized settlements in most of what is being referred to as the West Bank, but Jerusalem is different. That is the capital, the heart of the Jewish world, and should not be in other hands.
 
F0uad

F0uad

Well-Known Member
LOL flinstinians and this guy is commenting like he knows anything about Palestine.
Steelarcher maybe you didn't know but 85% was Arab Muslim prior to 1948 and only 5% was Jewish the other 10% was Christian Arabs.
Its the foreigners that kicked out the Arabs and Christians of there land and not the Jews that lived with the Muslims.
 
Last edited:
Shermana

Shermana

Heretic
F0uad said:
LOL flinstinians and this guy is commenting like he knows anything about Palestine.
Steelarcher maybe you didn't know but 85% was Arab Muslim prior to 1948 and only 5% was Jewish the other 10% was Christian Arabs.
Its the foreigners that kicked out the Arabs and Christians of there land and not the Jews that lived with the Muslims.
Click to expand...

What's wrong with kicking people out who attack you first, especially when you let the ones who stay have citizenship despite their leaders encouraging if not forcing them to leave? Was Israel supposed to just let them all back in after they were helping the Arab armies attack them first?

For someone who believes in kicking out people who helped their enemies, can't you at least extend the same belief to your enemy?
 
Shermana

Shermana

Heretic
Assad91 said:
Right? They come to the land from Europe, and declare the land theirs, and than starts to attack everyone. They deserve to be kicked out.
Click to expand...

If they buy up much of the good useable land (6% of the total includes the Negev desert where no one lived by the way), it's not a problem to declare it theirs.

"Starts to attack everyone". Really? It's vicious lies like this that demonstrate your side isn't concerned about truth when it gets in the way of your rhetoric. Must be inconvenient.

By all means, please tell me at what point the Jews started "attacking everyone". I imagine you think that all the Arab attacks on the Jews (such as which prompted the formation of the pre-Haganah militias) was due to these so-called Jewish attacks "on everyone". Got a link showing these Jewish attacks on everyone that demonstrates the Jews struck first? Or would you like to kindly admit that this "Jews attacked first" bit is one of the lies you have to rely on for your story to sound legit.
 
Shermana

Shermana

Heretic
Assad91 said:
Yes. Really. Stealing land and declaring it yours is an attack. As the Israeli government still carries on to this day.
Click to expand...

But again, it's not "stealing land". They bought what they held until 1948. I understand that the whole "Stealing land" shtick plays another important role in the cycle of malicious lies which the anti-Israel case relies on. But it's simply not the case. Land taken in defensive war is not stealing, and the Jews legally purchased practically all the land they held before 1947-1948. Did you answer my question about why the Arabs claim Morocco to Iraq? Did that have nothing to do with "Stealing land"?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top