• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Zionists to continue invasion by building new settlements in Palestine

Matemkar

Active Member
Israel OK’s 300 new illegal settler units

nushi20130530200525690.jpg


The Israeli regime has given the final go-ahead for the construction of 300 new illegal settler units in East al-Quds (Jerusalem).


Housing Ministry spokesman Ariel Rosenberg said on Thursday that the new units will be built in Ramot neighborhood, which lies in the territory Israeli occupied in 1967.

On Wednesday, an Israeli NGO said that the regime plans to build 1,000 new settler units in East al-Quds.

Israeli settlement watchdog Terrestrial Jerusalem said that contracts for 300 homes in the northeastern settlement of Ramot were signed and another 797 plots were to be offered for sale in the southern settlement of Gilo.

Gilo is also one of five major settlements in East al-Quds that were established by the Israeli regime following the Six-Day War of 1967.

A new report has revealed that the Israeli regime confiscated 1,977 acres of the Palestinian lands in the occupied West Bank for its settlement activity during 2012.

The settlements, which cover an area roughly equal to 1,035 soccer fields and twice as big as New York's Central Park, were approved by “military order,” the Israeli daily Haaretz reported on May 27.

The report said most of the new settlements were located deep in the Palestinian-inhabited West Bank.

The presence and continued expansion of Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestine has created a major obstacle for the efforts made to establish peace in the Middle East.

More than half a million Israelis live in over 120 illegal settlements built since Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territories of the West Bank and East al-Quds in 1967.

The United Nations and most countries regard the Israeli settlements as illegal because the territories were captured by Israel in the war of 1967 and are hence subject to the Geneva Conventions, which forbid construction on occupied lands.

PressTV - Israel OK?s 300 new illegal settler units

Israel to build 1,000 illegal settler units in East al-Quds: NGO

nushi20130529215923893.jpg


The Israeli regime plans to build 1,000 new settler units in East al-Quds (Jerusalem), despite widespread international criticism over the construction of settlements on occupied Palestinian territories, an Israeli NGO says.


Israeli settlement watchdog Terrestrial Jerusalem said on Wednesday that contracts for 300 homes in the northeastern settlement of Ramot were signed and another 797 plots were to be offered for sale in the southern settlement of Gilo, AFP reported.

Gilo is one of five major settlements in East al-Quds that were established by the Israeli regime following the Six-Day War of 1967.

A new report has revealed that the Israeli regime confiscated 1,977 acres of the Palestinian lands in the occupied West Bank for its settlement activity during 2012.

The settlements, which cover an area roughly equal to 1,035 soccer fields and twice as big as New York's Central Park, were approved by “military order,” the Israeli daily Haaretz reported on May 27.

The report said most of the new settlements were located deep in the Palestinian-inhabited West Bank.

The presence and continued expansion of Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestine has created a major obstacle for the efforts made to establish peace in the Middle East.

More than half a million Israelis live in over 120 illegal settlements built since Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territories of the West Bank and East al-Quds in 1967.

The United Nations and most countries regard the Israeli settlements as illegal because the territories were captured by Israel in the war of 1967 and are hence subject to the Geneva Conventions, which forbid construction on occupied lands.

PressTV - Israel to build 1,000 illegal settler units in East al-Quds: NGO

Israelis in Tel Aviv protest against occupation of Palestinian land

Baqeri_d20130602040620633.jpg


Israelis in Tel Aviv demonstrate against the regime’s occupation of Palestinian land, June 1, 2013.

Protesters in Tel Aviv call for the Israeli regime’s withdrawal from the Palestinian territories it has occupied since 1967.


The protesters marched from the ministry of military affairs to the headquarters of the ruling Likud Party on Saturday night.

Dov Khanin, one of the organizers of the protest, said the regime’s occupation of the Palestinian land is “dangerous, malign and expensive.”​
“The immense sum of money invested in building and securing the settlements and constructing apartheid walls, means less to welfare and education,” Khanin said.

Israel continues with its expansion of illegal settlements in Palestine.

On Thursday, the Tel Aviv regime announced the approval of 300 new illegal settler units in East al-Quds (Jerusalem).

More than half a million Israelis live in over 120 illegal settlements built since Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territories of the West Bank and East al-Quds in 1967.

The United Nations says the settlements are illegal because the Palestinian territories were captured by Israel in the war of 1967 and are hence subject to the Geneva Conventions, which forbid construction on occupied land.

PressTV - Israelis in Tel Aviv protest against occupation of Palestinian land
 

Rakhel

Well-Known Member
Let's start a new game.
How many times in one post can you repeat the same article?

Okay? Go.
 

Matemkar

Active Member
Do you think it is a game?
The end of articles always include analysis about the past. And, the past never changes.. So what?
Should I edit them? It would not change the reality anyhow..
 
Last edited:

Rakhel

Well-Known Member
A rally in Tel Aviv on Saturday night turned confusing as protesters could not agree on what they were protesting, an eyewitness told Arutz Sheva.
The rally had been promoted as part of the series of “social justice” protests that began in the summer of 2011. However, many protesters turned up with signs protesting not unemployment or tax hikes, but the “occupation” – Israel’s presence in Judea and Samaria (Shomron).
Confused Protest:

Same rally
Hundreds of people protested Saturday evening in Haifa, Tel Aviv and Jerusalem against the one-percentage point VAT increase, which was set to go into effect at midnight.

"The finance minister (Yair Lapid) has to wake up, or the people will wake up in the next elections," said Ofer Barzilay, one of the protesters in Jerusalem. "This is the most unfair tax. Those who buy Rolex watches and those who buy bread pay the same amount of tax."http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4386934,00.html

Again, same rally.
The protesters condemned plans to raise workers' income tax by 1.5 percent while increasing corporate taxes by one percent.

Protesters were carrying banners that read, "Take from the tycoons, not us."

Similar protests also took place in al-Quds (Jerusalem) and Haifa.
PressTV - Israelis rally in thousands to protest austerity budget
 

InChrist

Free4ever
It is their country and Jerusalem belongs to Israel. I don't see any news or controversy when Californians build houses in San Diego.
 

Sha'irullah

رسول الآلهة
Well perhaps when Filistinians bring forth another claim such as "This is our land" and bring forth any historic claim predating Israelis they will be believed. But sadly Filistine is not in Israel ;) it is next door in a place called Jordan.
A city such as Jerusalem is claimed by Filistinians yet they have no claim to an area with obvious Hebrew culture and still no Filistinian historic evidence to assert they are natives of this territory. Ironically every Muslim wants Jerusalem. Religion mixed with political agendas are at hand. This is a matter of Jews putting property on their land not the other way around. Filistinians have a right to integrate into whatever country but they want a Sariyah controlled zone espousing their views. This is an old trick that needs a new pony.
 

Shermana

Heretic
They're only illegal to Ban Ki Moon, but he doesn't seem to understand his own international law he's supposed to uphold as much as he understands wealthy donors from the Arabist side.

ROZENMAN: Ban Ki-Moon is wrong about Israeli settlements - Washington Times

So anyways, at what point did Turkey legitimately own Istanbul, just out of curiosity? Is there a rule that after so many years the settlement becomes legal? What's the magic number?

At what point did the lands become "Palestinian lands"? Were they not "Jordanian lands" from 1948-1967? Was Jordan illegally occupying it during that time?

Is Turkey not illegally occupying West Kurdistan?
 

darkendless

Guardian of Asgaard
Looking on a map I see Israel. I do not see Palestine.

Jerusalem is a long way from the nearest border (Jordan) by map.

/End argument.
 

Matemkar

Active Member
Do not tell me it is the right of theirs who settled first.
As far as I know, the Jews did not go to "the Promised Land" peacefully and the natives did not hand it willingly..
Why not kick the "jews" to Egypt where they came from?
So, it is basically hypocrite you focus on a certain nation and its position with a specific time in history..
If you wish every nation go back to the place where they were before.. So, let's start with zions.. And Americans..
Oh, forgot, there's no nation called Americans.. Let's kick them to Europe where they came from..
So, it is hypocricy you want Turks back in Asia or Arabs back in Arabian peninsula but, not saying anything against "Jews" in Palestine or "Christians" in the US..
I do not like hypocrisy..
I believe the UN have no rights to determine the borders and the fate of Palestinian lands.. If they feel sorry for their massacres against jews, they should give a land of their own to compensate it for zionists..
And, those zionists for the last 60 years have been transgressing by killing and displacing Palestinian, Lebanese and Syrian muslims and christians..
Hope they stop.. And rethink their stance.. They are doing exacly the same thing what Pharaoh and Nazis did to them.. And, Alhamdolellah, I see in those protests there are some questioning their criminal policy..
 
Last edited:

Shermana

Heretic
Do not tell me it is the right of theirs who settled first.
As far as I know, the Jews did not go to "the Promised Land" peacefully and the natives did not hand it willingly..
Why not kick the "jews" to Egypt where they came from?
So, it is basically hypocrite you focus on a certain nation and its position with a specific time in history..
If you wish every nation go back to the place where they were before.. So, let's start with zions.. And Americans..
Oh, forgot, there's no nation called Americans.. Let's kick them to Europe where they came from..
So, it is hypocricy you want Turks back in Asia or Arabs back in Arabian peninsula but, not saying anything against "Jews" in Palestine or "Christians" in the US..
I do not like hypocrisy..
I believe the UN have no rights to determine the borders and the fate of Palestinian lands.. If they feel sorry for their massacres against jews, they should give a land of their own to compensate it for zionists..
And, those zionists for the last 60 years have been transgressing by killing and displacing Palestinian, Lebanese and Syrian muslims and christians..
Hope they stop.. And rethink their stance.. They are doing exacly the same thing what Pharaoh and Nazis did to them.. And, Alhamdolellah, I see in those protests there are some questioning their criminal policy..

Indeed, I do not like hypocrisy, which is why Turks should be the last people on Earth to talk about Jews settling on a land they claim as their own. Americans coming in for a very close second.

I like the fact that you agree the UN has no right to talk about anyone's borders. So there goes the whole "international law" aspect of the equation. There's no "criminal policy" if the one who gets to label it as "Criminal" is in the wrong.

As far as I know, the Jews did not go to "the Promised Land" peacefully and the natives did not hand it willingly..

It seems what you know about the Zionist period in Ottoman Turkey does not go too far.
 
Last edited:

Assad91

Shi'ah Ali
Hey the Native Americans used to live here centuries ago. Maybe they should have the right to force us out of our homes, and forcefully steal our now owned land.
 

Assad91

Shi'ah Ali
UN gave Israel a specific border. Why Israel steals more land, forcefully, who knows. Lets just say God supposedly gave them that land, so stealing land that is not technically owned by them is just okay. Right.
 
Top