Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber
And yet it happened.No. Impossible.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
And yet it happened.No. Impossible.
I'm a civil engineer. I think the collapse of WTC 7 is consistent with it being caused by fire.Anyone here that has architecture/engineering background I want your opinion. Do you think a 52 floor, all steel framed(I-beam and connectors) and concrete building that was damaged on one side, maybe two sides by scattered fires would free fall all at once, equal all over, at the exact same time?
Well, no. Off the top of my head, I can think of two other steel skyscrapers - right near WTC 7 - that collapsed from fire.(Incidentally, this made WTC 7 the only steel skyscraper to have collapsed from fire.)
I don't believe that for a second.This has nothing to do with conspiracy theories or anything else.
She's an idiot who has no idea what she's talking about. Why? Because fire isn't all created equal and doesn't all have equal tempuratures, and you don't have to melt steel to cause structural failure.Rosie O 'Donnel of the popular television news show "The View" said it was it the first time in history that fire melted steel.
Think about THAT!
The danger of fire to steel buildings was already in engineering textbooks.If what has happened on 9/11 had any impact on the science, you'd expect to see that in the textbooks on construction (and demolition). Do you?
Not the association of architects and engineers; just a group of them.As for the specific case of how the buildings collapsed, I'm not an expert so I have to go with the real experts. The association of architects and engineers (don't remember the exact name) thinks it's impossible for a building to collapse in that way with the damage received.
Quite.I'm a civil engineer. I think the collapse of WTC 7 is consistent with it being caused by fire.
Well, no. Off the top of my head, I can think of two other steel skyscrapers - right near WTC 7 - that collapsed from fire.
Countless other steel buildings have also collapsed from fire.
I don't believe that for a second.
First, I should acknowledge that your question aboutChina built two hospitals in 7-10 days. If we want something to happen, we can make it happen.
I'm usually not into conspiracy theories but 9/11 has so many holes in the official story that it is impossible to believe without eyes wide shut.
As for the specific case of how the buildings collapsed, I'm not an expert so I have to go with the real experts. The association of architects and engineers (don't remember the exact name) thinks it's impossible for a building to collapse in that way with the damage received.
If what has happened on 9/11 had any impact on the science, you'd expect to see that in the textbooks on construction (and demolition). Do you?
Well, this was a blast from the past.Wish I knew more to help you out. Unfortunately for me I haven't grown tired enough of arguing with "truthers" and their pictures and videos that are mostly so blurry that at one point in time I forgot more than a few clear videos and pictures of the attack exist.
I don't doubt that our government could rig a building for
controlled demolition in 7-10 days. But doing so would be
apparent to management, maintenance staff, & tenants.
That would require that the project be kept secrete by
the thousands of people involved
While you as a passer by wouldn't recognize demolition work,I'm not so sure of that. I've gone into buildings and seen work crews in there, and I (like most other members of the general public) really don't know exactly what they're doing or why - because it's really no one else's business or concern other than the building's owners and management. So, I doubt it would require "thousands of people" keeping a secret.
I'm not saying that this proves a controlled explosion. I've seen plenty of good arguments against the claim that the WTC was brought down by a controlled explosion, but this just isn't one of them. There are plenty of historical examples of terrorists surreptitiously planting bombs and blowing things up rather quickly with no one noticing until it's too late. That fact alone demonstrates that it could happen.
Many architects have spoken out against the official narrative.On the contrary, the sole possible reason for posting this is to reheat stupid conspiracy theories. This was all gone over, in enormous detail, at the time, by engineers and architects who actually knew what they were talking about, as opposed to silly people on the internet with bees in their bonnets of various kinds. This topic is a real tinfoil hat job:
But have any commercial property managers explained away my criticism?Many architects have spoken out against the official narrative.
I don't know how they brought explosives in. There are multiple theories; but it can be done. It should be investigated.But have any commercial property managers explained away my criticism?
While you as a passer by wouldn't recognize demolition work,
management & maintenance staff easily would've. The project
would look very different from maintenance & construction.
And the workers would be unfamiliar. Were I there, I'd want
staff to explain & show the work orders.
How on Earth could that be done in secret without all of the
people involved being in on the conspiracy to murder the
tenants & themselves?
We can assume a great number of possible things.I don't know how they brought explosives in. There are multiple theories; but it can be done. It should be investigated.