Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I thought of asking that but I kept it short and sweet.You mean science proving something? I'd like to know too!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I thought of asking that but I kept it short and sweet.You mean science proving something? I'd like to know too!
Fine, be what you want to be.
Are you familiar with the Tyre prophecy? It was predicted that Babylon would destroy Tyre. That there would be no sign of it. That it would never be found again or lived in again. Babylon failed. Tyre is still a thriving city.
Oh yeah, the Ediacaran, where frond-shaped, non-motile organisms first appeared...no precursors to the Cambrian biota. Sorry.And that site refuted your claim. The Cambrian began about 540 million years ago. Fossils of multi-cellular life appeared in the Ediacaran, before the Cambrian:
Ediacaran - Wikipedia
The problem is that the authors of that were not very good students of either history of the Bible. Tyre always was the island city. If you read the Bible it clearly refers to "Tyre on the sea" and other wordings that tell you that. Tyre was not scraped clean. It was not destroyed as predicted.
Dude - again
I never said that !
You put words in other people mouth, and then react to it.
Oh yeah, the Ediacaran, where frond-shaped, non-motile organisms first appeared...no precursors to the Cambrian biota. Sorry.
The problem is that the authors of that were not very good students of either history of the Bible. Tyre always was the island city. If you read the Bible it clearly refers to "Tyre on the sea" and other wordings that tell you that. Tyre was not scraped clean. It was not destroyed as predicted.
So what is your explanation for that failure?
You are the clueless and naïve one, to think that there are no intelligent, invisible forces that exist....that people on this very forum who regularly speak w/ some of these entities are delusional....that highly respected people like Winston Churchill -- and a multitude of others -- claiming to have had spirit encounters, are...what? Just liars?And you are such an expert on what is accurate science
that you reinterpret a talking snake book to say there really
was a flood, and science be hanged.
Only a person who actually is seriously clueless
could think the part in bold is, ah, "accurate" science.
It is garbage.
Baptism by fire huh?
First day on the boards
You are the clueless and naïve one, to think that there are no intelligent, invisible forces that exist....that people on this very forum who regularly speak w/ some of these entities are delusional....that highly respected people like Winston Churchill -- and a multitude of others -- claiming to have had spirit encounters, are...what? Just liars?
You're the one whose head is in the sand! Sad, really.
You have been a bit of a jerk yourself for a noob.
How can I - you just discounted my source as not very good students...
I think your sources are;
Not very good students of the history of the Bible - so they are biased - like you and I.
Your not right, how do explain?
(This is your science)
You are looking for an argument -
Since I never said your not right. Your Predisposed to fight - no one can have a conversation with you
- and everyone I’ve meet before that says “I have a lot of friends” really don’t have very many friends - of course, you would have to prove you have friends - otherwise I won’t believe you
You are the clueless and naïve one, to think that there are no intelligent, invisible forces that exist....that people on this very forum who regularly speak w/ some of these entities are delusional....that highly respected people like Winston Churchill -- and a multitude of others -- claiming to have had spirit encounters, are...what? Just liars?
You're the one whose head is in the sand! Sad, really.
If they don’t believe in God =
God will not be in their life. He will be there, but not present in their life. So in a simple form - their belief is correct - this is why we try to save.. but have little luck -
If you read the Bible itself it clearly paints Tyre as the island city. If you knew the history of if the wealth of Tyre came from the island city both due to its natural port and due to it being the source of the "Royal Purple". Tyre was the one source of the dye that was royal robes were made of. Odd what can make a city rich. Nebuchadnezzar was referred to as a "king of kings" in the Bible. He was the head of the "many nations" that attacked Tyre. Here is a little bit of a primer for you:
Tyre, Lebanon - Wikipedia
The prophecy was against Nebuchadnezzar. Attempts to move the prophecy 250 years later makes no sense since those were not the people that insulted Israel. That was the leader Nebby. Zeke got ticked off and made a prophecy against Tyre. It failed. And he even admitted that at the end of that passage. He then made another failed prophecy Zeke predicted that Nebby would defeat Egypt. That did not happen either.
Geez - your sourcing Wikipedia?
You can’t even source Wikipedia for college paper.
You were pretty close at the beginning -
But you moved to - source Wikipedia - lol on my gosh -
Or perhaps he does not exist at all. You do not seem to like proper tests of your God. A literal interpretation of the Bible refutes him. Studying the Bible refutes him. How would you test your God?