What utter nonsense!
Why would one interpretation be right and the other wrong, when you don't believe in either?
eeny meeny miny mo
Again, you just repeated the claim and did not reply to my comment. There is belief in a myth where zero of the components have been shown to be even a possibility and historical evidence.
This myth needs angels to be real and they have to speak to people.
We have no evidence of angels, no evidence they speak to people.
There is no evidence of God or any supernatural events actually happening, ever. Never mind the specific claims in one myth.
No God, no evidence for God, no God has made himself known or clear beyond stories. Superman, Inana, Zeus and Thor make themselves clear in stories also. Not evidence.
BUT, we do have massive evidence people make up religious fiction. Especially about angels. Mormonism is based on a visit and messages from an angel. Now it has millions of believers. It's also made up. Genesis is a re-working of Mesopotamian myth. The NT is also re-workings of popular myths from the time and region.
Then, Satan. No evidence for devils.
We do have evidence the Angel of Yahweh in the OT was changed because of exposure to the Persian devil and became like him in the NT.
Suspiciously they had a devil at war with God and humanity, a revelation end times myth before Christianity had any such thing.
Looks like they decided to use that for themselves.
I posted a quote from Zoroastrians, Their Beliefs and Practices, Boyce, this is a fact that they had these myths before Christianity and likely was the influence.
So we have all this historical information, only a small amount I touched on (Moses is considered to be fictional, this is consensus in Biblical historical scholarship, and so on), we know people like to make up religious mythology and we have NO evidence for anything supernatural, no evidence for Gods, angels, revelations.....
So it is not "eeny meeny".
What IS eeny meeny is which religion is true. There is no more evidence for any of them. But mythology is a fact. It exists. In fact you would admit that all of the other thousands of Gods and religions from mankind are fiction. No scientific proof exists for anything supernatural.
That is why. You have no reasonable evidence. How many posts have you written and still not presented one single bit of evidence beyond "I believe a story about a claim of angel messages".
If we were arguing which is more reasonable, historical knowledge or the claims of Jehovas Witnesses that everyone outside of their religion is going to hell, soon, all scholars who disagree with their JW theology are influenced by Satan as is every other religion including all other Christian sects.
Would you say "meeny miny"? Probably not. Except your story has no better evidence. Someone said it's true. Muhammad got messages, updates. Jehova got messages, updates. No difference.