I should not have said "nothing" because Imo the number of people who believe in God is an indicator that God most likely exists
That is the fallacy of argumentum ad populum.
, but that does not prove that God exists. As I said, it would be a fallacious argument to say that just because many or most people believe in God, God exists.
It's fallacious either way.
The number of people who believe has NOTHING to do with the probability of the claim being true. Nothing at all. It doesn't prove the claim, it doesn't support the claim, it doesn't make the claim more likely to be true in any way.
In other words, the number of people who believe in God does not prove that God exists, it is only am indicator
.
No, it's not.
It is an indicator because one would have to ask why that many people would believe in a nonexistent entity.
Superstition, ignorance, mistaken,....
Why did 100% of people one day believe in geocentrism?
To carry that a step further, there must be evidence for God's existence given that most people believe in God.
Euh.... consider every one of those people believes the god claims on FAITH, the exact opposite is true: there must be NO evidence - which is exactly why they require "faith".
The reason that nobody believes in the flying spaghetti monster is because there is is no evidence for him.
No. The actual reason why nobody believes in the FSM, is because it is satire and a parody of religion and everybody knows that.
People, even well educated ones, are very capable of believing the most incredible crazy nonsense... on "faith" you can believe anything. Go read the backstory of scientology for example.
To carry that a step further, atheists say they do not believe in God because there is no evidence, so why so all the believers see the evidence for God whereas the atheists don't see it?
There is no evidence. What some believers call "evidence", isn't evidence at all and instead just a bunch of fallacious reasoning errors... like circular reasoning, special pleading, argumentum ad populum, arguments from ignorance, etc.
Most believers admit there is no evidence and that that is why they take it all on faith.
Because faith is what you need to believe something for which there is no evidence.
And is there ANYTHING that you can't believe on faith? Nope. That makes faith worthless and not a pathway to truth.
I could believe on "faith" right now that an undetectable dragon is going to eat me at some point, unless I wrap myself in tinfoil. Show me wrong....