mmmmm.... nope. that isn't what I saidThat was precisely what you said in trying to dis my post
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
mmmmm.... nope. that isn't what I saidThat was precisely what you said in trying to dis my post
OK.... I really don't understand what you are "peed off" about.
Having implied i am a liar 3 times and you don't get it ... Sheesh
mmmmm.... nope. that isn't what I said
If you read that... you read into it. In no way, shape or form have I intimated or even had a shadow of a thought that you were lying or were a liar.Having implied i am a liar 3 times and you don't get it ... Sheesh
I rally think this part of our conversation is not beneficial as the beginning of the statement goes before that quoted one.If you read that... you read into it. In no way, shape or form have I intimated or even had a shadow of a thought that you were lying or were a liar.
I can say that before God. (my God, of course - whether real or just of my making)
What i said was
Was it? From your posts it seems not, and i truly feel sorry for people unwilling to expand their mind.
You replied
That cuts both ways.
I can only assume you meant what you said
If you read that... you read into it. In no way, shape or form have I intimated or even had a shadow of a thought that you were lying or were a liar.
I can say that before God. (my God, of course - whether real or just of my making)
That isn't intimated in any way, shape or form. It is a difference of perspectives and definitions. We may not agree with it but you didn't say I lied and I didn't say you lied.Whatever i said i though you contradicted said it was faith. No imagination required.
Whatever i said i though you contradicted said it was faith. No imagination required.
That site was actually quite good. I'm saving it.Well, yes. Not just standard religious faith. You do your morality and ethics without religion, but as far as I can tell, you haven't solved this:
https://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/0_0_0/whatisscience_12
Inspired by @Conscious thoughts 's thread. Mine? I'm not even gonna touch a definition. Too hard to come up with one that encompasses all religions. If you say your belief system is a religion then it is one. I'm not gonna argue. Most atheists don't say they are a religion. Thus I don't believe they are a religion. Some Satanists say they are others say they are just a philosophy rather then a religion. I consider my beliefs religious tho some dont. I might have a definition but I find it hard to word it.
"True religion is to know God as your Father and man as your brother. " UB 1955Inspired by @Conscious thoughts 's thread. Mine? I'm not even gonna touch a definition. Too hard to come up with one that encompasses all religions. If you say your belief system is a religion then it is one. I'm not gonna argue. Most atheists don't say they are a religion. Thus I don't believe they are a religion. Some Satanists say they are others say they are just a philosophy rather then a religion. I consider my beliefs religious tho some dont. I might have a definition but I find it hard to word it.
"True religion is to know God as your Father and man as your brother. " UB 1955
Something is true.That's one version relevant to you, through the ages there have been many "true" religions with different ideas
Something is true.
I'm saying that something is true regardless of what one might believed. Not everything believed is true.Not necessarily if you consider the 3rd definition which it seems many religious folk use to claim "truth"
I.e. that which you believe to be true.
It could be total bs, it often is, but if you believe it then you can claim "truth"
I'm saying that something is true regardless of what one might believed. Not everything believed is true.