That is a matter of opinion. I don't see how destroying two populated military installations would have been less of a warning than bombing two civilian cities, it seems like cold blooded over kill especially after all the fire bombings. You can always bomb the cities after you show off the power of the A-bombs if they don't listen to reason.
But honestly it just shows me that war in any capacity is a fools game, there are never any bad guys or good guys and it is distressing to see such language being thrown out there now a days.
Dude, this was a ugly time. Why have remorse for such violent people who did such horrific things?? They asked for it and recieved it.
now back to your post
That is a matter of opinion.
No it isnt, either you know the history or you do not. its obvious you do not.
I don't see how destroying two populated military installations would have been less of a warning than bombing two civilian cities
because it was such a clear message of the impending doom.
We would have fire bombed the whole country and peoples.
You need to understand in that time civilians were targets and this was a world war. there is no right or wrong, only winners. you dont let a ember smolder, you crush it out.
You had two choices to end the war, thats it. A or B
fire bomb everyone and everything resulting in 4 million deaths
or 2 atomic bombs resulting in 700,000 ish deaths